RAVENT

[RAVENT @RavenwithaT]

@BurrissSaniyah @onlyasillygoose @AbortionChat Not a permanent continous support.
Just until the victim stabilized.

You just pleading the consequence is too much when in reality it is not. Especially since the result of you evading the responsibility is the death of innocent victim.

[RAVENT @RavenwithaT]

@BurrissSaniyah @onlyasillygoose @AbortionChat They just lose the right to use their body to harm other. Specifically in this case because they are the one causing the victim to be in that situation.

That is like claiming you have the right to burn your cage after first putting involuntary victim in there because you own it.

[RAVENT @RavenwithaT]

@AvaLovelaceX Why are you counting from 1966? Shouldn't you be counting from 2010 at most to ensure your dwlusional group be counted properly?

[RAVENT @RavenwithaT]

@BurrissSaniyah @onlyasillygoose @AbortionChat In abortion case, the damage is someone is jeopardized to be dependant solely to the mother. A 9 month confinement is not unreasonable considering the impact to the victim.

[RAVENT @RavenwithaT]

@BurrissSaniyah @onlyasillygoose @AbortionChat Yes, you do. That is what fine is. The forcing of using the fruit of your labor to pay someone else.

The responsibility is as serious as the damage you cause.

[RAVENT @RavenwithaT]

@BurrissSaniyah @onlyasillygoose @AbortionChat That is not a justification.
That is just demanding a right to kill someone after her action was jeopardizing the victim.

Only psycho claims she has the right to kill someone after first causing the victim dependant to her.

[RAVENT @RavenwithaT]

@BurrissSaniyah @onlyasillygoose @AbortionChat Both of them are human and alive therefore both have the right of life, liberty and pursuit of hapiness.

[RAVENT @RavenwithaT]

@BurrissSaniyah @onlyasillygoose @AbortionChat That's like a murderer telling others to mind their business because she has the right of using her body to kill other.

[RAVENT @RavenwithaT]

@BurrissSaniyah @onlyasillygoose @AbortionChat Again, hiding behind a law.
A law is just codifying what everyone already know is wrong.

In abortion it is wrong because it kills a human being without justification.

[RAVENT @RavenwithaT]

@Jonathanjk @AbolitionRising Another sign of psychopath behavior, dehumanizing the victim.

You can deny it all you want, the fetus is human and alive. Hence they have the right not to be killed without justification.

[RAVENT @RavenwithaT]

@BurrissSaniyah @onlyasillygoose @AbortionChat Wrong again.
What happen when you kill someone as the cconsequence of the accident? You can get lock up.

The point is the responsibility to your action varies. And in sex, sometimes you get to win a better prize.

[RAVENT @RavenwithaT]

@ma1ybe Because there'll murderer still, we shouldn't outlaw murder. /s

[RAVENT @RavenwithaT]

@BurrissSaniyah @onlyasillygoose @AbortionChat This story will be the same for fetus.

That they are human and have human right.

[RAVENT @RavenwithaT]

@BurrissSaniyah @onlyasillygoose @AbortionChat Nope, just google how people in the past argue the humanity of slave. You'll get many great result of it.

The only reason you now singing the tune of slave is human is because majority finally accept what everyone can plainly see. That slave is human.

[RAVENT @RavenwithaT]

@BurrissSaniyah @onlyasillygoose @AbortionChat Nope, it is the same paying fine is basically a required use of your body(labor).

You just trying to plea that the responsibility is excessive, which it is not.

[RAVENT @RavenwithaT]

@BurrissSaniyah @onlyasillygoose @AbortionChat It is the same thing.
Some responsibility is as simple not be able drive away some as long as 9 to 10 months.

[RAVENT @RavenwithaT]

@BurrissSaniyah @onlyasillygoose @AbortionChat No it is not. The story is the same. As will be the answer.

It will end once people can deny the humanity of the victim.

You already claim fetus is human and alive. You just trying to deflect behind "person". Just like trying to differentiate gender and sex when both the same.

[RAVENT @RavenwithaT]

@Jonathanjk @AbolitionRising It is a murdered human.
A woman choice ends after she has sex, the pregnancy is the consequence.

Claiming she has the right to kill the fetus is psychopath behavior as only psycho claims she has the right to kill someone after first causing the victim dependant to her

[RAVENT @RavenwithaT]

@BurrissSaniyah @onlyasillygoose @AbortionChat Yes, you did. In car accident you lose your bodily autonomy to drive away. You even will lose the fruit of your labor by paying damage.

You don't get to claim the right to murder someone after first causing the victim dependant to you.

[RAVENT @RavenwithaT]

@BurrissSaniyah @onlyasillygoose @AbortionChat I know the difference.

The point I'm making is you are using the same denial tactic that is used years ago by slaver. By denying the "personhood/human/whatever wordplay you want" of the victim.