Kristy

Wife, Mom, & "radicalized conservative" to every man in a dress.

[Kristy @RayenyDays]

Hamtramck, MI has legalized the religious sacrifice of animals.

It's also illegal to hang a pride flag on City poles there.

Meanwhile leftist supporters of mass immigration are trying to end ranching because it's animal cruelty, while celebrating pride year round.

🥴🫠👀😂😭🤷🏻‍♀️

[Kristy @RayenyDays]

Sure, make ranching illegal to stop "animal cruelty."
Animals should just exist in nature.

EXCEPT, as the top of the food chain, our consumption of cattle (for ex) is literally nature.

They'll just be torn apart by other predators?! Duh? 🙄

https://t.co/TU1jBEKcwA

[Kristy @RayenyDays]

Or create new legislation/amend current legislation creating exceptions for cases like birth tourism and illegals.

One option's hard, the other essentially impossible, ESPECIALLY considering current legislative reps think their job description includes cowardice and vacation.

[Breanna Morello @BreannaMorello]

The only way to overturn today’s birthright citizenship SCOTUS ruling is with a Constitutional Amendment.

That means:

-290 votes in the House
-67 votes in the Senate
-Then ratification by 38 out of 50 states

[Kristy @RayenyDays]

@GavinNewsom LOL. When Trump loses in court (clear evidence he doesn't own SCOTUS and democracy is just fine) yet somehow Gavin's still using phrases like "Trump's Supreme Court" and "defend our democracy."

Delusions this intense should be medicated Gavin.

[Kristy @RayenyDays]

@bennyjohnson It's wishful thinking to believe any of that will happen.

This congress is worthless. The WH already failed on mass deportations.

November is coming.

No, this ruling is a guarantee against ANY of those changes, and if the Dems regain power, we'll never have a chance again.

[Rand Paul @RandPaul]

I introduced a constitutional amendment months ago, actually, to fix birthright citizenship.

After the Supreme Court decision, that amendment matters more than ever. I'm asking my colleagues to take it seriously and help me get this passed.

[Ron DeSantis @RonDeSantis]

“I do not forget the position assumed by some that constitutional questions are to be decided by the Supreme Court, nor do I deny that such decisions must be binding in any case upon the parties to a suit as to the object of that suit, while they are also entitled to very high respect and consideration in all parallel cases by all other departments of the Government. And while it is obviously possible that such decision may be erroneous in any given case, still the evil effect following it, being limited to that particular case, with the chance that it may be overruled and never become a precedent for other cases, can better be borne than could the evils of a different practice. At the same time, the candid citizen must confess that if the policy of the Government upon vital questions affecting the whole people is to be irrevocably fixed by decisions of the Supreme Court, the instant they are made in ordinary litigation between parties in personal actions the people will have ceased to be their own rulers, having to that extent practically resigned their Government into the hands of that eminent tribunal.“

—Abraham Lincoln, First Inaugural Address (1861)

[Kristy @RayenyDays]

Think the Trump Administration will rethink mass deportations now that SCOTUS has ruled on birthright citizenship?

Personally I don't think they have a choice.

Not if the President wants even a chance at ending his term with the legacy he predicted he would in '24.

[Ron DeSantis @RonDeSantis]

This was not a decision on procedural grounds (ie, POTUS can’t do this through executive order but Congress could legislate it); it is a substantive decision that says the 14th amendment requires citizenship for those born to, among others, birth tourists or those unlawfully present in the country.

Will need either a constitutional amendment or a future court to overrule this.

Anyway you slice it, the decision is a major defeat.

[Kristy @RayenyDays]

OF COURSE leftists don't see the ambiguous nature of the phrase "subject to the jurisdiction thereof."

You can't expect people who think the word 'woman' IS ambiguous to be logical enough to at least acknowledge that there's a question worth debating there.

[Kristy @RayenyDays]

@mhdksafa It's an easy concept: forced "donation" via taxation results in hatred and anger (driving people away from Christ).
Free them to donate themselves, quietly, and they embody His Word.

Socialism uses force while touting moral superiority, neither of which is true to His Word.

[David Santa Carla 🦇 @TheOnlyDSC]

Fencing was put up around the Supreme Court before their decision to overturn Roe V Wade.

There is no fencing put up before they give their ruling on birthright citizenship. Very concerning.

[Kristy @RayenyDays]

@SpeakerJohnson So maybe accomplish something we mandated in '24 then...? Literally anything.

[Kristy @RayenyDays]

@dandinohill All while blaming their midterm chances on podcasters. 😂😂
Because of course their shitty performances could have nothing whatsoever to do with their reelection chances... 🫠

[Daniel Horowitz @RMConservative]

Looks like no birthright today. We can enjoy our republic for another 24 hours.

[Kristy @RayenyDays]

@Geiger_Capital Considering how they ruled on mail-in ballots I wouldn't get too excited about this...

[Townhall.com @townhallcom]

BREAKING: The Supreme Court just ruled that President Trump has the executive authority to fire federal bureaucrats "without cause."

This overturns a lower court ruling reinstating Rebecca Slaughter as a member of the FTC.

A win for President Trump.

[SCOTUS Wire @scotus_wire]

🚨 In a 5-4 vote, the Supreme Court ruled that federal law does not require mail-in ballots to be received by Election Day, holding that states may count ballots postmarked by Election Day but received afterward if state law allows it.

[Election Wizard @ElectionWiz]

REPORT: US Supreme Court will issue opinions on Monday, June 29 at 10:00 AM ET, potentially impacting birthright citizenship.

[Kristy @RayenyDays]

So Netanyahu is now paying for and providing Jewish education to American-Jewish children in an attempt to end antisemitism here...

But no, they totally never interfere with our Country.

Imagine if any other nation attempted this. You'd lose your minds.

Insane