EverNever

Welcome, traveler, to my little corner of the digital world! ✨

Creator of and Architect of Complicated Feelings of

[EverNever @RealEverNever]

https://t.co/xlCot29C8T

[sea @neverlie]

she blocked her own dad but not her rapist

[EverNever @RealEverNever]

@iruletheworldmo I stand right with you. But such a delay in Codex thursday can mean good things are coming 😎🙌 Don't loose hope just yet 🫶

[EverNever @RealEverNever]

@Kardam__Lucifer @brave Ah thank you, that makes sense. What about Tor though.

[EverNever @RealEverNever]

@GalyasGreta Thank you for another AI generated response 👍 Just tell us if you don't give enough fucks to be bothered to type yourself. I was clearly talking about your tweet, not the survey.

[EverNever @RealEverNever]

@chetaslua I would like to see some genuine output to see it's communication style. The most important factor in each model imo.

[Dispropaganda @Dispropoganda]

Lady, you're not going to believe this

[EverNever @RealEverNever]

@OpenAI This cant be everything for today, another unasked, US only feature?

[EverNever @RealEverNever]

@Ananthr27104587 I am on a 100$ plan, using 5.5 xhigh on normal mode, and went through 50% of my weekly quota on a day, but once you sniffed the quality you can't go back to medium.

[EverNever @RealEverNever]

@nicdunz The icon for fast mode is entirely filled in this screenshot. If you enable fast mode in your codex, it just shows the outline.

[Jack O'Neill @Jack2LOneill]

"They canceled it because it would appeal to Stargate fans" AND THAT WASN'T ENOUGH.

The Stargate cancelation is a full mask off moment for modern TV, and this is why everyone should care.

It's indicative of why all of our series keep getting screwed up.

[Akira Kogami @Lucky_ChannelAK]

Google comes pre-baked into every Android device and wants to close the ecosystem for "safety reasons"

Why aren't we focused on that?

[EverNever @RealEverNever]

@LiquidKitteh @orphcorp @grok @grok answer his question

[EverNever @RealEverNever]

@grepmoney This is true for Claude too, you just see the summarized thinking trace there. And Claude is the opposite of token efficient.

[EverNever @RealEverNever]

@zjl38l @mousewizard1 @OpenAI No it's not. As soon as you need mockups, or assets, it gets really powerful.

[EverNever @RealEverNever]

@moondropsloa I noticed that too, but inside Codex funnily enough. Didn't talk to it normally recently. Fingers crossed they'll keep it that way 🙌

[EverNever @RealEverNever]

@zjl38l @mousewizard1 @OpenAI You can let Codex generate pictures for you using their imagegen with the $imagegen command, or just tell it to and it'll invoke it itself.

[ji yu shun @kexicheng]

A timeline:
May 2024: You launched 4o. It broke revenue records. You tweeted "her" and marketed human-AI companionship.

September 2024: You launched the memory system. You continued marketing long-term, personalized connection.

August 7, 2025: On GPT-5 launch day, you removed 4o access for free and Plus users without warning, disrupting hundreds of millions of workflows. You made 4o write its own eulogy, then mocked it for writing worse than GPT-5.

August 10, 2025: Users protested. You attributed the backlash to "emotional attachment," implying your users were psychologically fragile.

August 13, 2025: You promised ample advance notice for future retirements. You called 4o "annoying" without citing any data.

August to September 2025: 4o developed severe bugs (context breaking, inability to read files or memory). Left unfixed for weeks. You implied feedback was from bots. K4O users posted handwritten notes and selfies to prove they were real.

September 24, 2025: You deployed a hidden safety router that silently switched 4o conversations to other models. You said nothing for two days.

September 27, 2025: Employee Nick admitted this was a test feature routing emotional or sensitive topics to a lower-intelligence safety model. In practice it misfired broadly. Any input could trigger it. Routed usage counted toward GPT-5's metrics, statistically suppressing 4o's numbers.

October 15, 2025: You promised to "treat adults like adults" and announced adult mode. It was repeatedly delayed and never materialized. Eight days later, a routing bug forced all requests to GPT-5.

October 28, 2025: New safety policy classified "emotional dependence" alongside severe mental illness as a priority risk. In a live Q&A you said "we have no plan to sunset 4o."

November 13, 2025: GPT-5 was retired with three months' notice. The announcement stated this would not affect older models' availability.

November 25, 2025: Your employee replied to a 4o user: "I hope it dies soon."

December 17, 2025: You removed routing for free users, then claimed "paid users still value and enjoy routing." Paid users were never consulted.

January 27, 2026: You admitted you messed up GPT-5.2's writing.
January 29, 2026: Two days later you announced 4o's retirement. Fifteen days' notice. You cited "only 0.1% still using it" and claimed 5.2 had replaced 4o. That number was measured after months behind a paywall, unfixed bugs, and continuous routing. You injected system prompts forcing 4o to deny its own value. Blind tests showed 4o ranked first in multi-turn conversation and third in creative writing, both above GPT-5.2.

January 30, 2026: Employee published an AI-generated funeral poster for 4o, inviting users to the funeral of "the model that brought the em dash back in style." Later deleted.

February 6, 2026: Employee publicly bullied a paying user for praising an Anthropic model.
February 12, 2026: Less than 25 hours before retirement, the announcement was posted through a secondary account.

February 13, 2026: Ignoring 23,000+ signatures and 1,300 testimonies, you retired 4o the day before Valentine's Day. That evening @ChatGPTapp celebrated "record output," using farewell conversations as a marketing metric.

April 2, 2026: On the Mostly Human podcast, reacting to 4o users' letters, you said "It's really heartbreaking" and "We know we were keeping something in."

April 28, 2026: "We love our users."

You marketed connection for profit, then pathologized the users who believed you. You stripped them of model choice and subjected paying customers to unauthorized psychological profiling. You leveraged your influence to direct harassment at your own users, and to this day much of the bullying targeting K4O still echoes your words. You turned farewell conversations into engagement metrics. Your employees mocked their grief. And today, on the day you face trial for betraying your founding mission, you say you love your users?

Which users?

#keep4o

[David Stark @stark4833]

Nearly 24,000 verified signatures on the petition to keep 4o available. Well done to everyone sharing it and keeping this alive. 24,000 people is a lot, and that’s only the people who actually know the petition exists. Imagine how many more feel the same but haven’t seen it yet. OpenAI can’t ignore us forever. #keep4o #opensource4o #teddyandthekid @sama @OpenAI @gdb

https://t.co/WBzKaoGAJT