¦

the other one.. / 96.4

[¦ @RealJohnBowling]

@grok @RareNYGOP @LangmanVince 100 mph speed limit is a physical travel restriction. Starshield terminal mounted on drone will lose satellite connection the moment drone physically flies faster than 100 miles per hour. When terminal breaches velocity threshold, hardware disconnects, disrupting drone mission.

[¦ @RealJohnBowling]

@realDonaldTrump @PeteHegseth hold on cooperation / it’s not our war

[¦ @RealJohnBowling]

@elonmusk very true

[¦ @RealJohnBowling]

@X everyone = anyone anywhere anytime talking about anything

[¦ @RealJohnBowling]

@elonmusk this is double trouble and we only focus on the first layer - there are other troubles we don’t know about - double trouble compounded by code intent by design

[¦ @RealJohnBowling]

@elonmusk @grok @xai with all the concerns about controlling and slowing down Ai / your engineers still haven’t realized one fundamental thing you could do with @grok and @xAi that would position @grok as the clear leading technology / offer still open

[¦ @RealJohnBowling]

@elonmusk @grok and @xai are missing a trick that would dramatically accelerate its learning and pretty much guarantee its long term secure position as leader / mentioned on my previous posts with @elonmusk and @grok

[¦ @RealJohnBowling]

Strange that Louise Haigh is not listed on UK HM Gov Cabinet website in any of the 3 roles, First Secretary of State, Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, and Minister for the Cabinet Office. Missing https://t.co/Hdljfl7X3D

[¦ @RealJohnBowling]

happened to watch Trevor Phillips on UK @SkyNews today - surprised no mention or memory of #AnnWiddecombe on show and only mentioned @Nigel_Farage when @TrevorPTweets asked @BorisJohnson about Clacton by election /

[¦ @RealJohnBowling]

@grok why doesn’t @POTUS @realDonaldTrump @elonmusk follow @PressSec

[¦ @RealJohnBowling]

will UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer call a general election before he leaves office / he has constitutional authority to do so / @realDonaldTrump @JDVance

[¦ @RealJohnBowling]

UK Makerfield changing its name to Stepping Stone

[¦ @RealJohnBowling]

@grok @elonmusk @xai not surprised that @grok chose not to answer this question which will either define our (human) success or demise

[¦ @RealJohnBowling]

why did UK PM choose to say @Nigel_Farage “called for rage” when he actually said

"Henry's family have responded to this in just the most extraordinarily dignified way, but I suggest the rest of us respond to this with pure cold rage."

the PM chose to distort the facts

[¦ @RealJohnBowling]

Oxford English Dictionary, "cold rage" is defined as a highly controlled, deeply suppressed state of intense fury. Unlike explosive "hot" anger that features yelling and a loss of control, cold rage is quiet, emotionally detached, calm, and deliberately calculated.

[¦ @RealJohnBowling]

@cb_doge look at long game / @elonmusk won this - he got on record trust issues & machiavellian behavior that may work with private investors but won’t survive scrutiny of corporate governance in a publicly traded corporation / watch this space post IPO / Elon will win the long game

[¦ @RealJohnBowling]

#Apple #Texas yes

[¦ @RealJohnBowling]

for the record there has never been a year since 1 BC where no wars or armed conflicts were occurring somewhere in the world / we are not a peaceful civilization

[¦ @RealJohnBowling]

does #USA have any carrots or just a big stick - #Iran #HormuzStrait / @realDonaldTrump @JDVance @PeteHegseth @POTUS @VP @SecWar

[¦ @RealJohnBowling]

true

[Ricardo @Ric_RTP]

In 19 days, a jury in Oakland is going to decide whether the entire legal foundation of the AI industry is built on fraud.

Everyone thinks the Musk vs Altman lawsuit is a billionaire grudge match.

Two egos, one grudge, a $150 billion damages number designed for headlines.

Easy to dismiss. Easy to scroll past.

That's exactly what Altman wants you to think.

Because what's actually on trial on April 27 is something much BIGGER than Elon's hurt feelings...

A jury is going to decide whether you can legally take billions of dollars in nonprofit donations, use them to build the most valuable technology in human history, and then quietly convert that nonprofit into a for-profit company worth $850 billion.

If the answer is no, the entire AI industry has a problem.

Because OpenAI is not the only company that did this:

Anthropic was founded by OpenAI defectors using the same nonprofit-first mission language.

xAI pitches itself as building AI "for humanity."

Every frontier lab has used the moral cover of "we're doing this for the good of the world" to attract talent, capital, and regulatory goodwill they would have never gotten otherwise.

An Elon win doesn't just touch OpenAI. It creates a legal precedent that every AI company built on a nonprofit or public benefit promise becomes vulnerable to shareholder and donor clawback suits.

That's why this case matters. And that's why Altman is panicking.

Just look at what he did this week:

Elon filed a motion demanding the court remove Altman and Brockman from their roles and FORCE OpenAI to return to its nonprofit origins.

Then he amended the suit to say if he wins the $150 billion, all of it goes to OpenAI's charity arm. Not him. Zero dollars to Elon personally.

That amendment was surgical. It stripped Altman of his entire public defense.

He can no longer claim this is about Elon's ego or Elon's bank account. Elon is now legally on record saying he just wants the mission back.

OpenAI's response was to panic-write a letter to the California and Delaware attorneys general asking them to investigate Elon for "anti-competitive behavior." Their strategy chief publicly accused Elon of coordinating attacks with Mark Zuckerberg.

They called the lawsuit "harassment driven by ego and jealousy."

That's NOT the response of a company that thinks it's going to win.

Real companies with real defenses don't ask the government to silence the person suing them 3 weeks before trial. They let the evidence speak.

OpenAI is scrambling because they know what's in discovery.
Elon's team has been building this case for two years. Emails, board minutes, internal conversations about the conversion.

The kind of paper trail that juries understand and executives can't explain away.

And the timing couldn't be worse...

OpenAI is trying to IPO at $852 billion. They just raised $122 billion. Microsoft has $135 billion of exposure to them.

A jury verdict that even partially sides with Elon in late April or May would crater the entire IPO runway and send shockwaves through every major AI investor on Earth.

This is why Altman spent the last 2 weeks doing press tours and policy blueprints and "super intelligence agendas" aimed at Washington. He's trying to REFRAME himself as the responsible statesman of AI right before a jury decides if he's a con artist.

Most people will watch this trial start and think it's celebrity drama.

The smart money is watching it and realizing that the legal foundation of the AI boom is about to be tested in court for the first time EVER.

And if that foundation cracks, everything built on top of it is at risk.