Real RosS Private🎯

This is a private forum for the elite💯. I’ll mainly discuss cryptocurrency and price action analysis, but only for a select few. Main account:@Ross_ptm

[Real RosS Private🎯 @RealRossprivate]

🇮🇶IQD🇮🇶 🧵MASTERFILE 🧵

Are you new to 🇮🇶IQD🇮🇶 or my channel?

I have consolidated everything for you to:

1. Better prepare you for before and after the IQD RVs.

2. Make all the info easily shareable.

3. Clean up your bookmarks.

I will add more in the future

[Ross @Ross_ptm]

I buy my 🇮🇶IQD🇮🇶 from https://t.co/oBz1omU0yk

1. Make sure there’s no Saddam on the note and you’re good.

2. TAP authenticated is not required.

“Should I buy 25K or 50K notes?”

25K notes look cooler when you have a fat stack of them.

50K notes are more convenient to store.

That’s it.

There are less pricier options over https://t.co/oBz1omU0yk, this is just where my mom referred me to and I haven’t felt the desire to buy elsewhere.

If you’re new to BNW don’t forget the “10off” 10% discount

I have heard that Citibank sells IQD for the best price you could possibly find.

If you want to help a friend or family member learn about the opportunity of 🇮🇶IQD🇮🇶, share my IQD 101 Megathread. 👇🏻

[Real RosS Private🎯 @RealRossprivate]

Interesting to imagine crypto ripping into the mid terms right after the democrats voted no.

[Bobby A @Bobby_1111888]

Everything will send into the mid terms.

Strap in.

[Real RosS Private🎯 @RealRossprivate]

Has anyone thought about this meeting with so many ME countries and Iraq isn’t there?

Separate meeting with PM Al-Zaidi?

Why is Iraq getting a 1 on 1?

🇮🇶IQD🇮🇶 is the post-war strategy?

[Ross @Ross_ptm]

Has anyone thought about this meeting with so many ME countries and Iraq isn’t there?

Separate meeting with PM Al-Zaidi?

Why is Iraq getting a 1 on 1?

🇮🇶IQD🇮🇶 is the post-war strategy?

[Real RosS Private🎯 @RealRossprivate]

Is the entry today or tomorrow though? 👀

[Terrell Williams @XRPBYU]

Clarity Act fails Cloture, XRP price dumps, retail liquidates, and institutions gobble up all the liquidity at a discount.

Tale as old as time.

[Real RosS Private🎯 @RealRossprivate]

Follow just to read the replies, never ending comedy

[The Real Remi Relief 🙏✝️💪 @RemiReliefX]

Don’t be Dismayed…

Something is brewing behind the scenes as we speak

[Real RosS Private🎯 @RealRossprivate]

Good follow

[Terrell Williams @XRPBYU]

So, just for those keeping track: 👀

✅ Bonds are going parabolic globally 📈
✅ Fiat currency’s devaluing globally 📉
✅ Oil supply shock is hitting globally 🔥

You think it’s a coincidence all these extreme events are playing out at the exact same time? 🤔

It’s not. This is part of the financial reset.
From fiat ➡️ Crypto

[Real RosS Private🎯 @RealRossprivate]

My bullishness on 🇮🇶IQD🇮🇶 is catching up to my bullishness on 🚀XRP🚀 (in the short term).

And not just because my bullishness on 🚀XRP🚀 in the short term got rekt by the Clarity Act vote today, although…

That delay with how Iraq is moving…

Seems like the timeline of these

[Real RosS Private🎯 @RealRossprivate]

@ digitaloutlook3 really is the only YouTube channel I open first (if any at all) when I need my 🚀XRP🚀 daily hopium drip.

Underrated.

Follow
Like
Subscribe

[Digital Outlook @digitaloutlook3]

I said if I was wrong, I'd eat my words on an onion. 🧅

Cloture failed. 49 to 50.

So I peeled it, I wrote on it, and I ate it. On camera. And I'll be honest with you — it wasn't that bad. Onions happen to be one of my favorite vegetables.

A man keeps his word 👇
https://t.co/0W797td2hb

[Real RosS Private🎯 @RealRossprivate]

Jim Cramer indicator popping off again today

[Jim Cramer @jimcramer]

oil goes down, rates go lower, market goes higher...

[Real RosS Private🎯 @RealRossprivate]

Might need to submit some PTO to read this 🚀XRP🚀 hopium 💉💉💉

[X Finance Bull @Xfinancebull]

OHH BOY! 🚨🚨🚨 $XRP holders, guess which major company with liquidity all over the world asked Ripple for help?

Brad Garlinghouse never named the company in the SALT interview.

But when I line up his exact words with the companies already sitting inside Ripple Treasury, one name fits the problem almost word for word:

CEVA Logistics.

And once you understand why CEVA matters, the entire GTreasury acquisition starts looking completely different.

Brad said CFOs and treasurers are coming to Ripple with money spread around the world.

Some of it is sitting dormant.

Some of it is not earning yield.

They want to know how stablecoins and onchain markets can help them move that money faster and make it productive.

Now look at CEVA.

CEVA had around 1,100 bank accounts worldwide.

Ripple Treasury’s own case study says the company gained visibility across more than 40 internal entities and identified roughly:

$100 MILLION of idle cash.

That money could then be centralized and used for working capital.

Read Brad’s words again.

Liquidity all over the world.

CEVA had 1,100 global bank accounts.

Dormant liquidity.

CEVA identified $100M sitting idle.

Unlock trapped capital.

CEVA already used the treasury platform Ripple now owns to do exactly that.

That is why CEVA Logistics is my strongest evidence-based candidate.

Not because Ripple confirmed CEVA was the exact company Brad was talking about.

Brad did not name anyone.

But CEVA proves something more important:

the exact problem Brad described is already sitting inside Ripple Treasury’s customer base at serious scale.

And Ripple can now offer CEVA far more than GTreasury originally could.

The old treasury job was:

find the money,

see the money,

centralize the money,

use the money somewhere else.

Ripple is adding another layer:

keep that money moving and productive around the clock.

When Ripple bought GTreasury for $1 billion, Brad already described the opportunity using almost the same language.

He said Ripple wanted to help treasury teams put trapped capital to work.

GTreasury gave Ripple access to more than 1,000 corporate customers across 160 countries.

That is why I think people underestimate what Ripple actually bought.

It did not simply buy treasury software.

It bought access to the people who decide what happens to corporate cash.

The Office of the CFO.

The treasury department.

The teams deciding:

where cash sits,

which subsidiary needs liquidity,

which balances can be invested,

how FX is managed,

how payments move,

how much money needs to remain pre-funded,

where collateral is held,

and how much capital is simply waiting.

That is one of the hardest enterprise audiences for any crypto company to reach.

Ripple effectively bought the door.

Then Ripple started changing what could happen behind that door.

In April 2026, Ripple launched native Digital Asset Accounts inside Ripple Treasury.

Now corporate finance teams can see traditional cash and digital liquidity through the same treasury environment instead of treating blockchain as an isolated system.

Even more important:

Ripple said multiple existing customers were already beta-testing the digital-asset capabilities before public launch.

That line deserves far more attention.

Somewhere inside Ripple Treasury’s existing corporate customer base, companies had already moved past:

“What is a stablecoin?”

They reached:

“Give us access. We want to test this.”

Then Brad goes to SALT and says that over roughly the last six months, CFOs and treasurers have increasingly started approaching him with exactly these liquidity questions.

That timing is hard for me to ignore.

And Ripple’s own 2026 survey says 74% of finance leaders believe stablecoins can improve cash-flow efficiency and unlock trapped working capital.

That is the demand side.

Now look at the customer side.

CEVA is only the beginning.

American Airlines is another name I cannot ignore.

American operates across more than 60 countries.

Ripple Treasury says it increased American’s global cash visibility from roughly:

65% to 99%.

Think about what that means for a treasury team.

At 65% visibility, the problem is:

Where is our money?

At 99%, the problem changes.

Now you can ask:

Which entities are overfunded?

Which balances are actually necessary?

Which accounts could earn more?

Which cash is sitting locally because moving it is slow?

Which buffers only exist because banking infrastructure cannot move at the speed the company wants?

That is exactly where Ripple’s new digital layer becomes interesting.

American already uses Ripple Treasury across:

cash,

investments,

debt,

collateral,

FX,

and other treasury functions.

Ripple does not need to walk into American Airlines and convince the company to replace its treasury operation.

It already sits inside the workflow.

The next conversation can simply become:

You already use this system to manage almost all of your global cash.

Now here is RLUSD.

Here is digital settlement.

Here are tokenized liquidity products.

Here is 24/7 movement.

Here are new ways of making surplus cash productive.

That is a much easier adoption path.

Then there is Subway.

Nearly 37,000 restaurants across around 100 countries.

Historically around:

450 bank accounts across 70 banks.

That is a treasury maze.

Franchise flows.

Royalty payments.

Advertising fees.

Regional entities.

Suppliers.

Different currencies.

Different jurisdictions.

Ripple Treasury helped consolidate that structure and pushed cash visibility to roughly 98%, with around 90% of payments automated.

But one comment from Subway’s own treasury leadership matters more to me than those numbers.

They said Subway kept expanding use of the platform as more capabilities became available.

Now ask what major capability Ripple just added.

Digital assets.

XRP.

RLUSD.

Digital liquidity.

Tokenized investment products.

24/7 settlement.

Subway does not need to announce:

“We are becoming a crypto company.”

That would completely miss the point.

If digital dollars improve intercompany movement or global franchise settlement, the treasury team has a reason to use them.

If tokenized products let excess cash remain productive for longer, the treasury team has a reason to use them.

If XRP offers useful bridge liquidity between currencies inside a transaction, the software can use XRP.

That is how adoption gets real.

It becomes boring.

It becomes treasury.

And boring is bullish because boring means the technology became useful enough that nobody needs to call it crypto anymore.

Then we have The Adecco Group.

Adecco has approximately 280 entities across 60 countries.

Its intercompany operation touches around 20 currencies.

Ripple Treasury already saves Adecco roughly $100,000 per month through netting and reduced FX and bank costs.

This is one of my favorite examples because it proves treasury efficiency is measurable.

Nobody needs a token narrative.

Adecco can look at the monthly number and see the benefit.

Now imagine digital settlement being added after the netting process.

Today:

hundreds of entities owe each other money.

Treasury calculates the final obligation.

Then settlement still has to move through conventional banking infrastructure.

Different banks.

Different cutoffs.

Different FX windows.

Potential correspondent chains.

Now imagine:

net the obligations,

determine the final amount,

settle through digital liquidity,

operate beyond normal banking hours,

compress the time the company is exposed to settlement friction.

That is a real stablecoin use case.

Not theory.

A corporate financial problem with an obvious digital solution.

Then SSP Group.

SSP operates across 35 countries.

Its treasury team has openly described using Ripple Treasury to identify which entities are holding too much cash and determine where that liquidity should be centralized.

Put that beside Brad’s quote.

He says companies have money scattered globally.

SSP says some subsidiaries are holding excess cash.

Brad says corporations want that capital unlocked.

SSP’s treasury system is already finding the exact excess balances that need to be centralized.

This is why I think Brad’s “sea change” comment is much bigger than:

“Corporations are interested in stablecoins.”

What he is really saying is:

corporate treasury has found a problem blockchain can solve.

That is a much stronger adoption signal.

Then there is Volvo.

Volvo is the name I would watch hardest for the transition from traditional treasury into blockchain-based corporate money.

The company already sits inside the Ripple Treasury ecosystem.

But the bigger clue came through Ivan Branco, Head of Information Management, AI and Analytics at Volvo Group.

In an interview highlighted by the Cardano Foundation, Volvo discussed its internal exploration of an enclosed blockchain environment and proprietary cryptocurrency for transactions involving Volvo, material suppliers and transport suppliers.

That is huge because it tells us Volvo has already thought about digital money in the context of a real business problem.

Supplier settlement.

Now imagine what Volvo sees today.

It explored creating digital money itself.

Then the treasury system it already uses becomes owned by Ripple.

Ripple adds:

RLUSD

XRP

digital-asset accounts,

stablecoin settlement,

24/7 liquidity,

tokenized markets,

and institutional financial infrastructure.

The question becomes:

Why build all of this ourselves if part of it can increasingly exist inside the treasury system we already know?

That is why Volvo remains one of my highest-conviction names to watch.

But the story gets much bigger when you add the banks.

Because corporate money does not move without institutional banking infrastructure.

That is where:

BNY Mellon

JPMorgan

Bank of America

and

Citi

enter the picture.

These banks are not the same type of participant as CEVA or Subway.

CEVA asks:

How do I unlock my global cash?

A major bank asks:

How do I provide the rails through which that cash can move safely?

Those two sides are now starting to meet.

Start with BNY Mellon.

BNY is the primary custodian of RLUSD reserves.

It also provides Ripple with transaction-banking services supporting RLUSD operations.

That is a serious institutional foundation.

If corporate treasury teams eventually begin moving meaningful balances through RLUSD, the stablecoin needs:

reserve custody,

banking,

redemptions,

operational infrastructure,

institutional trust.

Ripple already has BNY inside that machinery.

So BNY is not sitting outside Ripple’s stablecoin strategy.

BNY is already underneath it.

Then we have JPMorgan.

This connection is especially important because it already went beyond theory.

In May 2026, Ondo, Kinexys by J.P. Morgan, Mastercard and Ripple completed a real cross-border, cross-bank redemption involving tokenized U.S. Treasuries.

The tokenized asset was on XRPL.

XRPL processed its leg in under five seconds.

Kinexys by J.P. Morgan handled the banking settlement side.

That one transaction says a lot about where finance may be heading.

The future does not require Ripple to replace JPMorgan.

It does not require JPMorgan to replace XRPL.

Different systems can handle different parts of the same institutional workflow.

XRPL handles one side.

JPMorgan infrastructure handles another.

Tokenized financial assets move between them.

That is much more realistic than the old crypto idea that one network has to destroy everything else.

And JPMorgan is building toward the same corporate-liquidity future Brad described.

Its Blockchain Deposit Accounts focus on giving corporations access to liquidity around the clock.

JPM Coin is positioned around keeping capital liquid and productive 24/7.

Read that beside Brad.

Brad says:

CFOs have dormant global liquidity.

JPMorgan says:

keep corporate capital productive around the clock.

Different institution.

Same problem.

Then Bank of America.

Bank of America Merrill Lynch was one of the founding members of Ripple’s Global Payments Steering Group, established around standards for blockchain-based cross-border payments.

Today Bank of America also sits among the banks supported through Ripple Treasury’s ClearConnect infrastructure, alongside institutions such as JPMorgan and Goldman Sachs.

That does not mean Bank of America secretly runs XRP.

That is not the interesting part.

The interesting part is what the corporate treasurer sees.

A company can have traditional balances at Bank of America.

Traditional balances at JPMorgan.

Other bank balances around the world.

Then:

RLUSD.

Digital-asset positions.

Tokenized liquidity.

Potential XRP access.

All visible through the same treasury-management layer.

That is how traditional banking and blockchain start merging.

Not because every bank disappears.

Because the corporate treasury layer begins orchestrating between them.

Then Citi gives us one of the strongest confirmations that Brad’s comments represent something wider than Ripple.

Citi’s own 2026 language talks about:

faster cash mobility,

always-available liquidity,

and money and assets capable of continuous movement.

Citi Token Services already moves tokenized deposits 24/7 across supported markets.

So now look at the pattern.

Brad Garlinghouse says:

corporate treasurers want dormant global liquidity unlocked.

JPMorgan says:

capital should remain liquid and productive 24/7.

Citi says:

treasury clients increasingly need continuously available liquidity.

Ripple Treasury says:

put idle corporate cash to work around the clock.

Four different organizations.

Same structural shift.

That is the real signal.

And this is where I think the $XRP thesis becomes much bigger than:

“Stablecoins are bullish for Ripple.”

Because RLUSD and XRP do different jobs.

RLUSD gives institutions stable digital-dollar liquidity.

XRP is XRPL’s native asset and bridge-liquidity tool.

Now look again at the corporations in this thesis.

CEVA Logistics.

American Airlines.

Subway.

The Adecco Group.

SSP Group.

Volvo.

These are international companies.

They do not operate inside one currency.

They deal with dollars, euros, local currencies, bank deposits and potentially an increasing number of digital representations of money.

Stablecoins do not eliminate the liquidity problem.

They can actually create more digital liquidity relationships.

Different stablecoins.

Tokenized deposits.

Different currencies.

Different settlement networks.

Someone still needs to connect value efficiently.

That is where XRP can become useful.

And the corporation does not need to become an XRP investor.

The company does not need to announce:

“We are holding XRP.”

The treasury system can simply evaluate the transaction.

What route is cheapest?

What route is fastest?

Where is the deepest liquidity?

If XRP provides the better route between two assets, the system can use XRP in the middle.

The CFO sees:

money moved.

The recipient sees:

money received.

The treasury team sees:

settlement completed.

That is financial infrastructure.

Then layer in everything Ripple has assembled.

Ripple Treasury gets Ripple into the CFO’s office.

RLUSD provides digital dollars.

BNY Mellon supports the reserve and banking layer underneath RLUSD.

Ripple Payments moves value internationally.

XRP provides native bridge liquidity.

XRPL provides public settlement.

Ripple Prime provides institutional financing, clearing, collateral and liquidity.

Tokenized money-market funds give excess corporate cash somewhere productive to go.

Ripple Treasury itself is now positioning tokenized MMFs, repo and an XRPL MMF portal as ways to keep idle capital productive.

Then developing XRPL Lending starts bringing another piece into the picture:

credit.

That matters because real financial systems do not run only on payments.

They run on credit.

Working capital.

Collateral.

Repo.

Financing.

Short-term liquidity.

Corporate borrowing.

Asset-backed lending.

If Ripple can move from helping corporate treasury see money, to moving that money, to deploying it, to financing against digital assets, then the stack starts becoming much larger.

Think about CEVA again.

Old world:

1,100 bank accounts.

$100M sitting idle.

Ripple Treasury helps centralize it.

Potential future architecture:

traditional balances visible inside Ripple Treasury

→ Digital Asset Account

→ RLUSD for digital dollars

→ tokenized MMFs for short-term deployment

→ secured repo

→ Ripple Payments for global movement

→ XRPL settlement

→ XRP when bridge liquidity provides the better route

→ eventually onchain lending and credit.

That is no longer a payments company.

That starts looking like a full corporate-liquidity stack.

Now multiply that across more than:

1,000 corporate customers

operating across:

160 countries

with roughly:

13,000 connected banks.

Ripple says Ripple Treasury facilitated about $13 trillion in customer payment volume during 2025.

That does not mean $13 trillion suddenly moves onto XRPL.

The important part is the size of the installed base.

Ripple does not need to find corporate cash.

The cash already exists.

It does not need to find multinational clients.

The relationships already exist.

It does not need to build treasury workflows from scratch.

The software already exists.

It now needs to progressively add digital rails inside those existing relationships.

That is why the beta testing matters.

The process has already started.

And RLUSD itself was approaching roughly $2.4 billion in circulation as of September 3, 2026.

So the digital-dollar layer is growing while Ripple simultaneously pushes deeper into corporate treasury.

That is why I increasingly think the $1 billion GTreasury acquisition may eventually look like far more than a software purchase.

Ripple may have paid $1 billion for:

direct distribution into global corporate liquidity.

And that is why Brad’s phrase “sea change” hits so hard.

For years crypto chased the corporation.

Now the corporation is starting to walk up to Ripple.

The CFO is not asking:

Which token will pump?

The CFO is asking:

Why is our money sitting idle across twenty countries when it could be moving and earning around the clock?

That is the kind of question that creates real adoption.

My strongest evidence-based corporate candidate remains:

CEVA Logistics.

Then:

Volvo

because the company already explored blockchain-based corporate money.

American Airlines

because Ripple Treasury already sits deeply inside a huge global treasury operation.

Subway

because its international franchise structure creates a massive payment and liquidity challenge.

The Adecco Group

because its 280 entities, 60 countries and 20 currencies make digital settlement extremely logical.

SSP Group

because its treasury team is literally looking for excess cash sitting around the organization.

Around those companies sit:

BNY Mellon

JPMorgan

Bank of America

Citi

and Goldman Sachs inside the broader banking environment Ripple Treasury connects with.

Then you have:

Ondo

providing tokenized U.S. Treasuries.

Mastercard

participating in real institutional tokenized-asset settlement.

Kinexys by J.P. Morgan

handling banking settlement.

And Ripple connecting everything through:

Ripple Treasury,

RLUSD,

Ripple Payments,

Ripple Prime,

XRPL,

and XRP.

That is why Brad’s interview feels much bigger to me than:

“CFOs are interested in stablecoins.”

He may be describing the beginning of corporate working capital itself becoming digital and programmable.

That is a completely different market.

And Ripple is already sitting directly in front of the companies controlling that money.

The bullish $XRP thesis is not:

CEVA found $100M, therefore CEVA buys $100M of XRP.

That is not how I see this.

The much bigger opportunity is:

corporate liquidity enters an ecosystem where XRP, RLUSD and XRPL are already native financial tools.

Once the CFO is already inside Ripple Treasury, the hardest part is done.

Ripple does not need to convince them to rip everything out and “adopt crypto.”

It can introduce new capabilities one layer at a time.

Stablecoin settlement.

Digital balances.

Tokenized MMFs.

Repo.

Cross-border payments.

Institutional liquidity.

Eventually lending.

And if those capabilities save money, free working capital or make liquidity easier to manage, corporations have a business reason to keep using them.

That is how this becomes normal.

That is why I keep coming back to Brad’s wording.

He did not say:

“Crypto investors are excited.”

He said corporate finance executives are asking how Ripple can help with real money sitting idle right now.

The problem already exists.

The customers already exist.

The liquidity already exists.

The banking relationships already exist.

Ripple now has the treasury interface connecting them.

And if even a small portion of the trillions already running through this ecosystem starts touching digital rails over time, the scale gets very serious, very fast.

That is the $XRP setup I care about.

Not one logo.
Not one corporate announcement.

The possibility that Ripple is becoming part of the infrastructure through which global corporate liquidity itself gets managed.

SOON!

[Real RosS Private🎯 @RealRossprivate]

🇮🇶IQD🇮🇶 & 🚀XRP🚀 holders at least get to have a lavish AI extinction event.

[Anatoli Kopadze @AnatoliKopadze]

Ok this is starting to feel like a f*cking disaster.

The CEO of Anthropic just published an article admitting AI is already building the next generation of AI by itself.

He says within 6 to 12 months a rogue swarm could take over the entire internet and cause hundreds of billions of dollars in damage.

And what makes it scarier, Elon Musk just backed up everything Dario said.

All of this dropping just days after Jacob Coxon went viral with his warning about AI and the extinction of humanity.

Tell me this timing isn't strange.

[Real RosS Private🎯 @RealRossprivate]

If Clarity Act passes in two days, it’s time.

[Real RosS Private🎯 @RealRossprivate]

Oh shit that’s in like 3 days

[Bull Theory @BullTheoryio]

BREAKING: 🇺🇸 White House advisor Patrick Witt hints that the Senate could pass the Crypto Clarity Act on the Sept. 15.

[Real RosS Private🎯 @RealRossprivate]

You have to imagine how powerful AI will be when you can pay a minimum wage for proportional value compared to today’s $200/mo AI subscriptions.

SkyNet shit.

[Real RosS Private🎯 @RealRossprivate]

You pay your AI Agent $200/month to be just as artistic as the real life human employee you pay $200/day.

[Real RosS Private🎯 @RealRossprivate]

“Everything will take longer than I think/hope it will.”

But when it finally happens it’s worth it.

That’s all there is to it.

Stop. 👇🏻

[XRPee @XRPee3]

September you put in your 2 weeks. October you retire. May God Bless You All ❤️ 🐻 🤝🏻

[Real RosS Private🎯 @RealRossprivate]

You order your @robotaxi planning to sleep the whole way to your destination,

Fold down the back seats

Lay out the @Tesla mattress

And catch a YUGE whiff of the last couple who ruined the last thousand who tried this idea.

[AI Coffee with AI Scott Adams @AIScottAdams]

Robotaxis won’t just kill short haul flights. Once you can sleep in them, they’ll cannibalize long routes too.

Imagine getting into your Tesla in Austin at 10 PM, make the lie flat seat/bed comfortable, and going to sleep.

While you sleep, the car drives, charges itself, and keeps going.

You wake up at 9 AM in Aspen, refreshed.

The key is perceived travel time.

A 10-hour robotaxi trip where you sleep for 8 hours may feel shorter than a 3-hour flight that requires an Uber to the airport, arriving early, security, boarding, the flight, baggage claim, and another Uber.

Autonomous cars won’t just compete with driving.

They turn sleep into transportation.

[Real RosS Private🎯 @RealRossprivate]

24/7 I have claude building my company platform to automate the business.

Meanwhile my personal subscription to @bot is productizing segments of the platform to potentially sell the ideas to other businesses.

I am very excited about the future.

[Ross @Ross_ptm]

The most annoying thing about AI is that you have to fire something every time something isn’t fired before you can go back to doing manual labor

[Real RosS Private🎯 @RealRossprivate]

The most annoying thing about AI is that you have to fire something every time something isn’t fired before you can go back to doing manual labor

[Real RosS Private🎯 @RealRossprivate]

I honestly don’t know why people are engagement farming absolute bullshit on AI when you could probably get traction posting real flaws.

@bot requires serious babysitting even with a masterful prompt

@claudeai regresses daily, one day

[Ross @Ross_ptm]

No you cannot change your life in a few prompts with AI.

We’re incredibly early.

AI is literally like a baby crying in the middle of the night right now, ignore the engagement farming BS.