How I Beat Cancer & Why Even Doctors Are Now Asking Me for Advice.
In 2020, I was diagnosed with cancer.
Looking back, it made sense. Since college, I have been living a circadian-disrupted lifestyle:
❌ Sleeping late, waking up exhausted.
❌ Spending most of my time indoors under artificial light.
❌ Eating at unnatural hours, disconnected from the sun.
❌ Constant exposure to blue light and electromagnetic fields at night.
In simple terms, I was disconnected from nature. My body—designed to function on light, magnetism, and water—was running on empty. My mitochondria were failing.
Instead of following a centralized, one-size-fits-all medical approach, I turned to quantum biology and circadian health—fields that explain how light, electrons, and energy shape our biology at the most fundamental level.
The Turning Point: Discovering Decentralized Health
At the time, I was already exploring circadian biology on Twitter. Dr. Marina Gamba (@marinagamba1909) introduced me to Dr. Jack Kruse’s (@DrJackKruse Epi-Paleo Rx), which changed the way I understood health. Instead of looking at diseases as isolated problems, I started to see them as breakdowns in energy flow at the mitochondrial level.
I didn’t stop at reading—I applied everything. With guidance from Dr M, I designed a cancer protocol tailored to Malaysia’s geography and latitude, ensuring it aligned with our natural environment. Along the way, I discovered Grimhood (@Grimhood) and learned more about quantum health through deep self-research.
For 1.5 years, I followed a strict decentralized healing protocol—one based not on pharmaceutical interventions but on nature’s laws.
Think of your body as a battery. To function optimally, it needs:
🔋 The right light – Sunlight recharges the battery; artificial light drains it.
🔋 The right charge – Grounding allows electrons to flow freely.
🔋 The right water – Structured water inside cells enhances energy flow.
🔋 The right fuel – DHA-rich seafood acts as an energy conductor.
🔋 The right sleep – Deep, high-quality sleep repairs and regenerates.
The Protocol in Action
✅ Sunning – Exposing my body to morning, midday, and sunset sunlight to optimize melatonin, dopamine, and mitochondrial function.
✅ Grounding – Walking barefoot on soil, grass, and seawater to absorb the Earth’s negative electrons, reducing inflammation.
✅ Epi-Paleo Diet – Eating DHA-rich seafood, organ meats, and eliminating processed carbs to restore my mitochondrial function.
✅ Cold Thermogenesis – Using ice baths and cold showers to boost mitochondrial efficiency and cellular repair.
✅ Quality Sleep – Aligning my sleep with natural light-dark cycles, going to bed after Isyak prayer and waking up before Fajr.
✅ Minimizing nnEMFs – Turning off Wi-Fi at night, using wired devices, and sleeping away from electronics to avoid mitochondrial disruption.
✅ Blocking Artificial Light at Night – Wearing blue light-blocking glasses and using only red light after sunset.
✅ Magnesium Maxxing – Getting magnesium from diet, topical sources, and ocean exposure.
✅ Black Seed Oil Maxxing – Leveraging its powerful anti-inflammatory & immune-supporting properties.
✅ Strictly Cutting Out Fluoride – Avoiding fluoridated water and toothpaste to protect my pineal gland and optimize melatonin production.
Why Did This Work?
Because cancer isn’t just a genetic disease—it’s a mitochondrial energy crisis.
Imagine your cells as tiny engines (mitochondria). When they don’t get the right fuel (light, electrons, DHA), they start malfunctioning.
Cancer is what happens when these engines switch from clean-burning energy (oxygen) to inefficient fermentation (sugar).
Modern medicine focuses on removing tumors which are needed for acute cases, but it doesn’t fix the broken energy system that allowed cancer to form in the first place.
I didn’t just eliminate cancer—I restored my mitochondrial function.
I went thru "hell" & with His Mercy, I survived.
Skin in the game.
No bs.
You can learn from me to avoid the mistakes I did so you can decrease the probability of getting one.
Or
You can make fun of it & go thru the same path.
However, I wouldn't recommend the later.
@AbudBakri For a man to practise rightful polygyny through marriage, taking women as wives is indeed a noble act.
It is far more honourable than engaging in scandalous unregulated polygyny outside of marriage while evading the obligations and accountability that marriage demands.
And this brings me to another important point. Men need to realign their priorities.
A man's attention, time, money, affection and energy are finite resources. He should be intentional about where he directs them.
Rather than entertaining women outside his responsibilities, he should concentrate on the women who are already entrusted to his care: his wife/wives, daughter(s), mother and other female family members within his responsibility.
Giving them his attention, providing for them, protecting them and looking after their well-being are not distractions from his purpose. They are part of his purpose and can be acts of worship when done with the right intention.
There is little wisdom in spending considerable amounts of time, money and emotional energy pursuing, entertaining and trying to impress women who have no legitimate place in his life, particularly when those same resources could be directed towards fulfilling the rights of the people who actually depend on him.
A man should not be so occupied seeking affection and validation from women outside his household that he neglects the people Allah has entrusted to him.
Stop investing husband-level attention and resources into women who have neither the intention nor the commitment to become your wife. Redirect that investment towards your actual responsibilities.
What we're witnessing in the West is not entirely foreign to us in the East. The cultural circumstances may differ, the severity may not be identical, and the methods may take different forms, but the underlying game is often remarkably similar.
In the West, many women openly engage in casual relationships, exploit men's emotional attachment, or keep multiple men around for attention and validation. In the East, particularly in a society like Malaysia where religious and cultural boundaries still carry considerable weight, the same dynamics can manifest themselves through seemingly more respectable arrangements.
Consider the modern talking stage, taaruf or whatever other terminology people choose to impose on these arrangements.
I'm not suggesting that genuine taaruf is inherently problematic. Quite the opposite. But some women understand that a man's natural inclination to provide, protect, pursue and emotionally invest can be exploited long before marriage ever takes place.
They know that a man who develops genuine feelings for them may willingly spend his money, time, energy and emotional resources trying to win their affection.
Yet they have absolutely no intention of making him their husband.
They can keep him around for months or even years, receiving attention, companionship, financial assistance, gifts, emotional support and whatever other benefits he is willing to provide, without ever having to make a meaningful commitment in return.
And because they are not married, there are no marital obligations involved. No obligation to fulfil the rights of a wife, no marital intimacy, and no commitment to building a household together. The man, meanwhile, continues investing in the hope that all of this will eventually lead somewhere.
Eventually, when they have extracted whatever they wanted from him, they can simply walk away with the familiar lines:
"You're too good for me."
"I don't think I'm ready for a marriage."
"You deserve someone better."
And then the cycle begins again with someone else.
The particularly interesting part is how differently society tends to perceive these two forms of exploitation.
A man who pursues a woman primarily for sexual gratification, engages in zina and subsequently abandons her is rightly criticised for his conduct.
But a woman who deliberately exploits a man's emotional attachment, generosity, time and resources without any genuine intention of marrying him is often given considerably more leniency, sometimes even sympathy.
I'm not suggesting that these two situations are identical. Because they are not. But both involve taking advantage of another person's vulnerability for personal gratification.
And the absence of zina does not automatically make one's conduct morally commendable.
This is where men need to exercise discernment. Not every woman who speaks about marriage is genuinely looking to become a wife. Not every woman who invokes taaruf has sincere intentions. Not every expression of emotional vulnerability is an indication of genuine interest.
Don't just listen to what women say they want. Observe what they consistently do, what they encourage you to invest, and whether their actions demonstrate a genuine intention to build something together.
A man should be generous, but not gullible. Compassionate, but not easily manipulated. Intentional, but never desperate for someone's affection.
There's a saying: Don't pay too much attention to what women say. Pay attention to what they actually do.
I think this is particularly relevant when observing many women in today's society. There's often a considerable gap between what is preached, what is demanded and what is actually practised.
I'm not saying this from a blackpill perspective. I still believe there are genuinely good women, and even exceptional women, out there.
But I suspect you'll find that many of them are rather low-key. They don't feel the need to constantly broadcast their opinions, seek validation, engage in unnecessary arguments or make a spectacle of themselves on the internet.
I want good men to win so good women will win too. And you men have to make yourself winnable.
There's a saying: Don't pay too much attention to what women say. Pay attention to what they actually do.
I think this is particularly relevant when observing many women in today's society. There's often a considerable gap between what is preached, what is demanded and what is actually practised.
I'm not saying this from a blackpill perspective. I still believe there are genuinely good women, and even exceptional women, out there.
But I suspect you'll find that many of them are rather low-key. They don't feel the need to constantly broadcast their opinions, seek validation, engage in unnecessary arguments or make a spectacle of themselves on the internet.
I want good men to win so good women will win too. And you men have to make yourself winnable.
@jess_ann_pin Cool story. But what else would you expect when a gender known for its deficiencies in intellect and piety is given unrestricted freedom, yet deprived of the guidance, protection and accountability that should come from their own fathers and husbands?
Respect comes from recognizing his strength and character, while love flourishes when she experiences the tenderness, patience and affection he deliberately cultivates within their marriage.
Had a long conversation in person with someone I recently connected with, somewhere between Zuhr and Asr.
He's transitioning from the financial advisory industry into farming, having come to the realization of just how deeply entrenched usury is within the financial system. Some things simply cannot be made halal by changing the terminology or repackaging the products.
We exchanged ideas, and I orange-pilled him here and there about Bitcoin.
Our discussion eventually went deeper into barakah culture vs hustle culture, and how the fiat-based usurious system has conditioned people to prioritize short-term gains over long-term value creation.
When money is constantly losing its purchasing power through monetary inflation, people are pushed into a perpetual state of financial anxiety. Everyone is racing against time, chasing returns, and trying to stay ahead of a system designed to make them feel like they're always falling behind.
This is how an economy built around debt and artificial monetary expansion gradually shapes human behaviour, culture, and even our relationship with time.
We also touched on masculinity, femininity, gender dynamics, and how modernity continues to distort the natural order of things. As men, we have a responsibility to recognize these forces and resist them rather than passively surrendering to the culture.
InsyaAllah, regenerative sheep farming is on the horizon, alongside various decentralized initiatives surrounding health, wealth, and ways of living.
Less extraction, more cultivation. Less dependency, more sovereignty. Less chasing, more building.
On my way home, I decided to stop by the gym, only to realize that I'd left my workout attire behind.
No excuses. Seize the day.
Ended up getting a solid session in wearing jeans.
Sometimes, you just have to work with what you have and make the most of the day.
Alhamdulillah for the conversations, the connections, the ideas, and the opportunity to keep building something meaningful.
> Women demanded freedom
> Weak men surrendered their leadership
> Society celebrated the abandonment of traditional boundaries
> That freedom eventually came with consequences
> Now, women are complaining about those consequences and conveniently shifting the blame onto men
Men should not be surprised by this kind of kurang akal, kurang agama behaviour when they themselves have abandoned the responsibility of leadership.
A man's responsibility is not to accommodate every demand a woman makes, seek her approval or surrender his principles to avoid upsetting her.
Men must stop outsourcing their judgment to women.
Take charge of your households.
Establish boundaries.
Exercise your responsibility as leaders.
Listen to Allah and His Messenger ﷺ, not the prevailing demands of a society that has made a virtue out of disobedience.
The last sentence is the only part of this entire argument worth agreeing with:
"Men are the cause of much of what is happening right now."
But not for the reasons this woman seems to think.
Men have a responsibility to exercise leadership over their households, guide the women under their care, establish boundaries and take an active role in ensuring that their families are not swept away by the destructive priorities of modern society.
Instead of allowing the women in their households to spend their most formative years chasing academic credentials, career advancement, financial independence and an increasingly individualistic lifestyle at the expense of marriage and family formation, men should be actively encouraging and facilitating marriage when a suitable opportunity presents itself.
If a woman desires marriage and motherhood which I believe most if not all women do, why should the people responsible for her welfare passively watch her postpone those aspirations indefinitely in pursuit of an increasingly elusive definition of financial security?
Why should a father, brother or guardian wait until she is in her late twenties or thirties, emotionally exhausted by the dating market, and complaining about the absence of suitable men before taking an active interest in her future?
A good man should be helping to facilitate a good marriage, not merely watching from the sidelines while society conditions the women under his responsibility to become increasingly detached from their natural responsibilities and family life.
And this is precisely why whenever I come across arguments like this, I take them as an opportunity to reflect on my own leadership over my household.
Am I doing enough to guide my women? Am I establishing the right priorities? Am I creating an environment where marriage, motherhood, family and religious obligations are valued above the superficial pursuits that society constantly glorifies?
I have no intention of waiting until the consequences become irreversible before taking these responsibilities seriously.
A man's responsibility is not simply to provide for his household after the damage has been done. It is to exercise leadership, foresight and discipline so that his household is not led into the very circumstances he was supposed to protect them from.
Men should stop outsourcing their responsibilities to society, social media and whatever happens to be culturally fashionable.
If we are serious about the state of our families and the next generation, we should start by taking responsibility for the leadership of our own households.
Giving women unrestricted freedom to use social media has become one of the most destructive developments in the normalization of fitnah.
It has created an environment where women can effortlessly become a source of provocation, temptation, and unnecessary trouble for men outside their household and circle of mahram.
A man should be capable of setting boundaries on how the women under his responsibility conduct themselves online. If his women post something inappropriate/wrong/nonsense, he should be able to correct her, tell her to take it down, and expect her to respect his instruction.
This is not merely about controlling what happens within your own household. It is also about preventing your household from becoming a source of fitnah for somebody else's.
Unfortunately, I don't expect the average man to possess the authority, discipline, leadership, or competence required to exercise this responsibility properly.
Which is precisely why we are witnessing more and more women publicly displaying their lack of intellectual restraint, modesty, and piety across the internet, often with an almost celebratory attitude, as though their own shortcomings were something to be proud of.
What was once considered unbecoming behaviour is increasingly being repackaged as empowerment, celebrated for engagement, and displayed as a badge of honor.