@LyssAnthrope I think this is one part of your argument I just genuinely don't understand yet. Would you be more ok with laws that require people to remain pregnant if human physiology were such that in order to remain pregnant a woman had to voluntarily rub her belly once a day?
@LyssAnthrope@JaredKubin@lydiataydavis If I was standing in the middle of a pool holding an infant and I decided I don't want to be holding her anymore, so I drop her into the pool, I'm pretty sure the law would call that killing rather than letting die. Either way, it's wrong and should be illegal.
@LyssAnthrope Yeah, this is gross. If the biological function of an organ can mean another person has a right to be in it, that goes very dark places very fast. There are good prolife arguments. This is emphatically not one of them.
@LBR4567@Crowl8wg@just_mindy That's not how the law currently works in New York. I think it's a lot closer to how the law should work. If someone takes your purse out of your lap and walks off, that's stealing, even if you were too shocked or too drunk to tell them to stop. And even if they were drunk too.
@LBR4567@TwoQuoque@TurtleTime911@just_mindy Legally is a separate question, and one I'm not qualified to answer. But morally, if you get the texts that 57 men got in their Snapchat feed that night, you absolutely have a responsibility to do something.
@realbuffhole@secularprolife There's a big difference between an organism never coming into existence in the first place, and a living organism being killed.
@LyssAnthrope Agree with the first two, disagree with the third (both that the language of killing is hyperbolic/imprecise and that it's incongruent with nonpenalty for women who have abortions and LOTM exceptions)
@LyssAnthrope@CamrynHorchow@Squish43172398@baz_blackadder@dudewatevs56@FreakiSeeki Thanks for clarifying. I was saying: If law not recognizing you as a person means you're not a person, then 1940s Jews in Germany & 1840s Black people in the US south weren't people. But they were people. Therefore, the law not recognizing you as a person doesn't mean you're not
@LyssAnthrope I fully agree that those children's deaths have nothing to do with abortion. I don't think we disagree about how grotesque it was to bring up jurors' possible abortions in the first place. We might disagree about how much added grossness there is in the gender piece, I'm not sure