If you’re not willing to dialogue toward finding common ground, you have no room to ask me to listen to your position.
And if you also say I should adopt your position without discussion… sorry not sorry… but No, I will not adopt your position purely on principle.
#Vote
If you're angry about Elon Musk becoming the first trillionaire after a lifetime of innovation just wait until you hear about how the federal government steals over five trillion dollars from the American tax payer per year.
It took Elon 36 years of work.
In that time the federal government stole 105 trillion dollars in taxes. Not to mention the 40 trillion they took out in debt.
Did they solve world hunger? Did they give you free healthcare? Did they give everyone a house?
No. They blew up a couple million people living near Israel.
But, yeah. Elon is the real problem.
Yann LeCun proposes a brilliant idea.
And he wants the AI industry to stop building "AGI"
For years, every major tech company has been chasing Artificial General Intelligence, a single, massive AI that can do absolutely everything a human can do.
Turing Award winner Yann LeCun and his co-authors published a paper that completely destroys this approach.
He argues the entire concept of AGI is scientifically and philosophically flawed.
Why? Because humans aren't actually "general."
We suffer from a massive biological blind spot. We think we possess general-purpose intelligence only because we cannot comprehend the tasks we aren't evolved to do.
Our brains were not designed for complex mathematics, massive data processing, or scientific research. We are simply highly specialized biological machines.
So why are we forcing AI to mimic our limitations?
LeCun's paper introduces a radical pivot: Superhuman Adaptable Intelligence (SAI).
Instead of building one bloated model that can write poetry, drive a car, and predict protein structures—and doing all of them mediocrely, we must embrace specialization.
When multiple tasks compete for the exact same neural capacity, their gradients conflict. The performance drags.
Forcibly pursuing generality is an inefficient, unscientific trap.
The AI that cures cancer should not be the exact same AI that does your taxes.
Under the SAI framework, AI doesn't need to imitate humans. It needs to learn the underlying structure of the world and surpass us in the specific, critical areas where human cognition hits a wall.
@jackcoder0 Conclusion stated another way, "in the hypothetical extreme, the economic incentive collapses in on itself".
In reality, where solutions are hammered out, the economic incentives are part of the equation.
@TaraBull Allegations are easy to claim. Evidence, not so much.
Until the actual due process elicits evidence, my stance is unchanged. Massie is the most principled elected official since Ron Paul.
@willchamberlain Omg, you're sooo right! Ugh, who wants a fiscally responsible, constitutionally principled person running the most powerful organization on earth? Ew!
My latest thoughts on $BTC, $STRC, and $MSTR with @TheBonnieChang and @davidlin_TV at Consensus 2026.
0:00 - Strategy’s Bitcoin sale controversy
0:36 - Why Strategy may sell Bitcoin
3:12 - “Never sell your Bitcoin” explained
4:40 - How Strategy buys more Bitcoin than it sells
6:33 - Michael Saylor’s Bitcoin accumulation philosophy
8:04 - Using Bitcoin liquidity and market arbitrage
11:14 - Responding to Ponzi scheme criticism
13:32 - STRC trading patterns and Bitcoin buying
15:05 - What really drives Bitcoin’s price
17:58 - Bitcoin, macro risks, and Fed policy
19:43 - Bitcoin as digital capital and digital credit
21:52 - Strategy’s dominance in preferred stock issuance
23:09 - AI, digital credit, and Bitcoin’s future
24:36 - Saylor’s childhood inspiration and MIT story
Nothing infuriates an uninformed Congressional Dem more than when they realize they voluntarily triggered a debate with someone who actually knows what they are talking about, reads federal statute and adheres to Supreme Court precedent. Today’s self-implosion by @rosadelauro was quite remarkable to witness. Without apology or regret, I will always adhere to the best available reading of federal statute pursuant to the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Loper Bright.
@RepThomasMassie@coleslawless Safety over freedom is a logical policy position in a world that breeds chaos and destruction.
But it's a policy position that will always be abused by those who seek control.
@RepLuna To deserve better, the American people need to be far more engaged during primary elections, rather than simply voting along party affiliations.
There is no excuse to not be more informed in our modern age with information literally at our finger tips.