As a former lib, I want to explain why I flipped to conservative. My journey is similar to @DaRealAmberRose’s story. I know there are many of us.
I was in a beauty pageant in high school. The top 5 finalists were all asked a different question.
Mine was, “In your future career, what would you like to do?”
I wanted to be a journalist so I told the judges, “Go to Washington DC and interview politicians because people think they’re corrupt. And I just don’t believe that.”
Oh, that naivete lived on with me for decades.
I lived my life and didn’t pay much attention to politics. I just voted Democrat because they seemed to care about the little guy.
Fast forward to the 2016 election…
I didn’t care for Trump. He was crass and seemed arrogant.
All I had to do was look at any media for confirmation I was right.
I even stopped using our pro-Trump dog groomer.
Yes, I voted for Hillary. She had gov’t experience so it was a no-brainer to me. (Emphasis on NO-BRAINER!)
My fiance (now husband) was conservative but never pushed his views on me. He’d talk politics & I’d just roll my eyes.
One day he mentioned Trump had appointed a gay man to a position in his administration. (Sorry, I don’t remember the deets now.)
Anyway, I balked. “No, he didn’t! None of the news is reporting it.”
He showed me it was so on several alternative new sources.
That piqued my interest. I hadn’t paid much attention to how slanted the news had become.
So I started listening to other accomplishments he told me about Trump. None of it was reported in the mainstream media. Ever.
Over the rest of Trump’s term, I slowly became a supporter. I was quiet about it, but I did a lot of digging.
Whenever I’d try to have a conversation with my liberal friends, I got shut down.
I’d ask, “What’s so bad about Trump?”
One said, “I’m not taking the bait.”
What? I just wanted to understand the rabid hatred of a man who seemed to run our government efficiently.
The economy was booming.
We had global respect and no wars.
We got tax breaks.
All of his policy was governed by the Constitution - which sets America apart from the rest of the world.
Then I noticed the media dial up the division.
Defund the police.
Open the border.
Empty the prisons.
Identity politics run rampant.
Why did they promote such chaos?
Until I remembered one of the principle tenets of Marxism, “In order to gain control, you must first create chaos.”
It’s really rather brilliant. First, the Left creates intolerable chaos, then swoops in as heroes to fix it all. Mostly by stripping the peons of their rights.
And the lies and disinformation were astounding!
Trump was a Russian plant.
Trump paid prostitutes to pee on him (WTF),
Trump held aid for Ukraine hostage.
Hunter Biden’s laptop was Russian disinformation.
Lies, lies, and more lies.
If he were so evil, why did they have to make shit up!? “Journalists” were nothing more than shills for the Democrats!
Then, when the election was stolen in plain sight, I got mad.
When Trump questioned the results (as many past candidates have) he was set up with the January 6th debacle. Falsely framed as a “dictator” who refused to leave office.
And the character smearing has only heightened since Biden was installed. (81 million votes, my ass.)
Attacks on MAGAs became more blatant.
We’re painted as uneducated rubes who need to be rounded up into re-education camps. Half of the country!
Our borders are purposefully overrun.
Americans watch as our debt grows higher than it’s ever been (another trillion every 100 days!)
We’re giving billions to Ukraine and leaving behind $80,000,000,000 worth of military equipment or the radical terrorists in Afghanistan.
Our tax dollars pay for illegals to have free transportation, housing, cell phones, and medical care…while our vets get practically nothing.
Clear evidence the Biden family is compromised and selling access to America for 10% for the big guy is ignored.
The government is a corrupt money-making machine for career politicians. How do you explain how the majority of them becoming millionaires while in office?
And all the while, the media’s twisted narrative paints Trump as a Hitler-type. They mangle his platform by trying to attach Project 2025 to him, which isn’t his policy.
But no matter how much you try to rebut the media, they double down and invent new lies.
Or just continue to repeat the old ones like a chapter right out of Orwell’s 1984.
Now they’re adding fake AI into the mix.
When they tried to assassinate him on July 13th, I was furious. It was the logical next step after failing at impeachment, bankruptcy and imprisonment.
That was the day I started actively following more patriots.
My account started as a business account.
Now I just want to connect with as many true Americans as possible.
Someday soon it will be important to be able to find each other.
It’s scary. It’s real. And I don’t know if we’ll be able to save our country. I see how deep the tentacles go in our corrupt government - far deeper than that young high schooler I was would ever have been able to believe.
I was right about one thing. Democrats are for the little people.
As my husband says, “Democrats are for the little guy. So the way to increase their base is to make sure more of us to stay small. Republicans are for the wealthy. So they want more of us to become wealthy.”🧵
From now on, I’m full on MAGA. Ultra MAGA. If that makes me an enemy of our corrupt State, I’ll wear it as a badge of honor.
🚨🚨 THE ILLEGITIMACY PLAYBOOK / THE DEMOCRACY FILES: A PRIMER 🚨
I will be using this thread to track all drops, so bookmark it.
I spent most of yesterday backing everything (now 312 gigabytes) up in various sources and getting the materials out to others. I also produced an AI video (below) to explain the whole thing to others are not on 𝕏 - feel free to distribute.
Here's the primer:
USAID, the foreign aid agency, had a democracy office. Inside the agency, it was called DRG.
Officially, DRG administered "democracy assistance." They'd go inside countries they thought were sliding into authoritarianism and help the opposition there. That assistance included election monitoring, judicary support, independent media, and civil society building.
You may have heard the term "color revolution." The model comes from Serbia in 2000, where trained student activists brought down Milosevic with the help of Western governments, after sustained protests. With the help of USAID's democracy office, this model was implemented in many other countries to topple governments: Georgia's "Rose Revolution" in 2003, Ukraine's "Orange Revolution" in 2004, and many more.
Then last year, DOGE shut down USAID. But the USAID democracy office didn't stop. They formed a group called the Democracy Renewal Group, the same initials as their office (USAID Democracy, Human Rights, Governance). Their goal: apply their own playbook to the United States itself.
This goal became a plan, called Renew American Democracy (RAD). It invoked the "4 B's" framework. Block - use lawfare and protests to make life harder for the Trump administration. Bridge & Belong - control dialogue and win people over. The final and most important B is Build. Build means redesigning the American government itself, and the crisis is the opening.
In their own words:
"We can take that breakdown moment and leverage it for a big structural reform, you know, refounding moment." - Danielle Reiff, DRG lead.
Calls show DRG working alongside DSA on ideas of creating a different government, one that does away with the Constitution itself.
DRG does not run the Block operations. They hand it to UDA, the United Democracy Alliance. One organizer calls it a "huge galaxy": lawsuits, street protests, non-cooperation. They list No Kings, Indivisible, MoveOn, 50501, and many other mega-activist NGOs among their members.
Another organizer calls UDA Erica Chenoweth's project. Chenoweth is the Harvard professor behind the three-and-half-percent rule of regime change: get that share of a country's populace onto the streets, and historically, the movement wins.
The UDA is very "hush-hush." They have no website, no roster, no filings.
Then come the red lines: things the Trump administration could do, such as calling the Insurrection Act on protesters, that would mean that the federal government, in their words, "crosses the threshold into illegitimacy." Nobody voted on those lines. There was no public debate. These red lines were developed within secretive working groups, and in a paper addressed to governors and staff.
In the words of Reiff/DRG:
"So that if there is a red line crossed in terms of a Constitutional crisis, like everyone's already pre-organized. And so Mike Smith actually said, he goes, oh, you guys have the day after tomorrow plan."
Cross a line, and the paper's options include states refusing to lend their resources to federal officials, and governors convening what it calls a "Third Continential Congress."
Running the UDA's Insurrection Act working group: Rear Admiral Mike Smith (RET) of National Security Leaders of America (NSL4A). NSL4A is also credited with operationalizing UDA, the blocking operations. NSL4A consists of about 1,600 ex-officers, spies, diplomats. They're turning red lines into indicators and running a situation room to monitor them throughout the midterms and beyond.
The NSL4A's lawyers told them to stop recording meetings in case of subpoenas. But the rest of the network continued to record. DRG works in conjunction with Renew to Thrive (R2T), which ended up accidentally publishing 400+ calls and thousands of documents. These calls and documents were never meant for our eyes, but it's them, on tape.
Thousands of NGOs and billions of dollars are involved in this endeavor. Most of them believe they're saving democracy. The problem is that people who spent their careers deciding when other countries' governments had lost their legitimacy wrote that test for ours, in private, and planned for what comes after.
Who decides when your government is legitimate?
In my last two threads, I explained how communists have always taken power, what DataRepublican just uncovered, and how to counter it. Today I have one message, and it's for Donald Trump: be very careful.
The most dangerous part of their plan isn't what they will do. It's what they want you to do.
According to the files, the strategy is to generate clash after clash in the streets until the president invokes the Insurrection Act. That is the red line. The moment it's crossed, they declare the federal government illegitimate and shift legitimacy to the governors who refuse federal troops. Read that again. The trigger is your response. The trap is built so that defending order becomes the proof of tyranny.
This is the oldest move in the revolutionary playbook. Provoke the state, film the reaction, and turn the reaction into the justification. Revolutionaries have always needed the government to overreact at the right moment, in front of the right cameras. They have already written the script. The only role left to cast is yours.
So, Mr. President, don't give them the image they need. Don't fight on the battlefield they chose. Fight on yours.
Your battlefield is daylight. Publish every dollar of public money that flowed to these networks, every grant, every sub-grant, every intermediary, and let the American people see it with their own eyes.
Your battlefield is the law. Hold public hearings under oath while you still hold Congress. Enforce the laws already on the books, through the courts, calmly and relentlessly. Prepare the constitutional response to rogue governors now, so nothing has to be improvised in a crisis. Those who improvise under pressure make the mistakes their enemies were waiting for.
Your battlefield is technology. Give citizens open AI tools to trace their tax dollars and map these networks themselves. DataRepublican did it almost alone. Imagine a hundred million Americans doing it. A nomenklatura survives through opacity, and AI is the end of opacity.
And your battlefield is November 3. Every vote is a vote on whether an elected government gets to stay legitimate.
Their plan needs two things: chaos and a strongman to blame for it. Give them neither. Give them transparency and the Constitution, applied without flinching. Nothing destroys a network that lives in the dark like daylight. Nothing destroys a legitimacy campaign like a government that stays scrupulously within the law.
The stakes could not be higher. If the United States falls to collectivism at the very moment superintelligence arrives, there is no fallback, no other country able to rebuild the free world. Western civilization would be lost for good.
You have the institutions, the facts and the
Constitution.
Don't let them write the ending.
🚨 Ilhan Omar is NOT the only one. There are 19 NATURALIZED immigrants sitting in Congress right now.
Not one of them had to pass an FBI background check to see classified information.
That's because members of Congress get access just by winning an election. NO security clearance required.
They don't have to disclose whether they hold DUAL CITIZENSHIP either.
Your average Army private gets more vetting than the people writing our national security laws.
Read that again.
This needs to change NOW.
LA, I hate to break it to you, but your chance to vote for common sense came and went back in June.
You’re getting a commie, now.
Don’t try to write in my name on the ballot. I won’t tell you who to vote for, but there aren’t write-ins allowed, so it might actually get your ballot rejected.
I encourage you to still vote. Don’t stay home. You don’t have any choice in the mayor’s race, but you still have a governor to pick and lots of taxes and ballot measures to vote on, including voter ID. Choose wisely.
I will never get a mammogram or a colonoscopy again.
Not because I don’t care about prevention. Because crushing breast tissue under massive pressure, forcing a scope through the colon, or sticking a needle into a mass is not prevention—it’s provocation.
A tumor is often the body’s way of containing what it cannot safely eliminate. When you smash, cut, or biopsy that containment, you can rupture it. Bacteria, debris, or cancer cells get driven into surrounding tissue. Lymph nodes that were already overloaded get disturbed. Then the next scan looks “worse,” and everyone acts shocked.
Why do we still treat these invasive procedures as the gold standard when they can create the very problems they claim to catch early?
I saw Charlie Kirk murdered on camera
I saw Iryna Zarutska murdered on camera
Televised deaths are not new
The only difference is that this time the person dying actually deserves it