‼️ One Year Later: Still No Answers for Jack & Lilly Sullivan 💔
Tonight on CTV News NS, renewed focus on the heartbreaking disappearance of precious siblings Lilly Sullivan (now 7) and Jack Sullivan (now 5) from Lansdowne Station, Pictou County. Reported missing May 2, 2025 after wandering from their rural home on Gairloch Road.
Just shy of a full year of unimaginable pain for their family; waking up every day without their babies. The Nova Scotia RCMP says the investigation remains active & comprehensive, with hundreds of interviews, polygraphs, forensics, 8,000+ videos reviewed, and 1,100+ tips. Volunteers searched the woods again this past weekend. All avenues open, they desperately need specific, fact-based tips, not rumours.
Lilly: Light brown hair, hazel eyes, 4 ft. Last seen pink Barbie top & pink rubber boots.
Jack: Dark blonde hair, hazel eyes, 3.5 ft. Last seen black Under Armour pants, blue dinosaur boots & pull-up.
$150K reward still active. These children deserve to come home!
Also a huge thank you to @901Lulu! Your dedicated posts, insight, and relentless updates on this case and many others are so deeply appreciated and incredibly helpful. Everyone following this story should follow @901Lulu too for the latest. 🗞️
Contact: Northeast Nova RCMP MCU 902-896-5060 or Crime Stoppers 1-800-222-TIPS.
#BringJackAndLillyHome #LillyAndJackSullivan #MissingChildrenNS #OneYearMissing
@901Lulu@RCMPNS@CTVAtlantic
These kids deserve answers and their family deserves peace. Please share & RT. 🙏💔🕯️
Also wrong...
“Preserved ejection fraction” is normal healthy heart function (EF ≥50-55%). Trump’s May 2026 physician report states: normal cardiac structure/function, no signs of heart failure, and no abnormalities on echo. HFpEF requires symptoms and clinical dysfunction , of which there’s none present.
And that photo isn’t “proof” of a stroke. It’s just Trump making a face. Official reports confirm normal neurological function with no cerebrovascular events. Appearance based speculation isn’t medical evidence…. Try again.
@JohnWKowal1 Oh look.. a fucking Canadian retard boomer saying retarded shit. I hope carney takes your savings, your house and all the socialist shit he promised you and takes your retirement and you’re left homeless begging to be pegged for a piece of bread.
Lmfao.
So let me get this straight. A father is a scumbag by your words if he walks away from a woman and leaves her a single mother and chooses not to pay support, but a mother who murders her child because she changes her mind about having a baby is supposed to be untouchable and there’s nothing wrong with that?? Am I understanding this part!
You still didn’t answer the question: If a man doesn’t want the child, can he walk away, leave her a single mother, and pay zero support “because it’s his choice”? Yes or no?
Pregnancy carries risks, but in developed countries like the US/Canada, the maternal death rate for a simple no-issue pregnancy is extremely low, around 0.01–0.02% (roughly 10-22 deaths per 100,000 live births overall, even lower in uncomplicated cases). Modern medicine has made it dramatically safer. That tiny risk doesn’t give anyone the right to kill an innocent human being with its own unique DNA, its own heartbeat, and its own body, yet you claim ending its life “isn’t murder.” Odd way of thinking.
If she doesn’t want the risks, don’t have sex. Same rule for everyone. Bodily autonomy doesn’t include the right to end another human’s life
@MikeZybisco@DavidFischer So if the woman doesn’t want it she can murder it.
If a man doesn’t want the child then by that logic it’s acceptable for him to walk away, leave her a single mother and not pay support for that child? It’s his choice.
Without a man’s sperm, there is no pregnancy in the first place.
Picture this: A man who has always dreamed of being a father finds out his wife is pregnant. He’s overjoyed; his greatest wish is coming true. But she decides she “isn’t ready,” schedules an abortion, and doesn’t even give him a say.
Is that fair to the man whose child was murdered because the woman chose not to have it?
Is it fair to the unborn baby who would have had a loving, eager father ready to raise and protect them, all because the mother changed her mind?
@MadAndy44@jackunheard Calling her a bad wife has actually nothing to do with whether or not she is medically trained or not. She still thought her husband was having a medical episode and did nothing, and even after the debate still chose to do nothing.
So yes. Bad wife.
This is so stupid.
I’ll never understand the logic of people who say men have no right to have an opinion about abortion because they cannot get pregnant and it’s not their body…
It was their sperm that entered the woman’s body to fertilize her egg for her to GET pregnant in the first place. Without men, there would be no babies. So why can’t a man have a say in whether or not a woman aborts a baby??
@MattWalshBlog 💯 agree, Matt.
Absolutely disgusting, psychopathic behaviour…
People like this should be banned from having any more children.
Disgusting fucks…
💔 Aborting an innocent baby in the second trimester just because of a Down syndrome diagnosis is inexcusable and sickening!! 😡
This precious child was a human life with inherent value!! Cognitive challenges, physical differences, or shorter lifespans do NOT diminish that!! 🙏
As a pro-life advocate, I call this what it is: the willful killing of a vulnerable baby. 👶
Every child deserves the chance to live. No exceptions. ❤️
@_NotWoke
#ProLife #AbortionIsWrong
#ProtectTheInnocent
(Credit to @RealBrittHughes for the video).
Aborting a child for a Down syndrome diagnosis is evil, and we should call it evil. Eugenics and infanticide do not deserve our sympathy or compassion.
You cannot claim that you’re aborting your Down syndrome child because you don’t want him to “suffer.” First of all, killing a child so they don’t suffer is psychopath serial killer logic. You’re on the same moral plane as Andrea Yates. Second, children with Down syndrome are famously some of the happiest people you’ll ever meet in your life. They are not in fact living in a state of perpetual torment. So what’s really happening is that you’re killing your child so that YOU won’t suffer the inconvenience of caring for him. This is about freeing yourself of your own perceived suffering. If you’re going to be a child killing sociopath, at least be honest about it.
People think the woke agenda is dead. Just because Trump has done a good job of suppressing it. But if Democrats win power again, it’s coming back with a vengeance.
“Parent” is neutral, sure, I’ll accept that. But, the bill isn’t just adding “parent” it’s replacing “mother” and “father.”… Those words describe specific biological and relational realities: a father is a male parent, a mother is a female parent. Erasing sex specific language doesn’t make reality neutral, it just confuses kids and weakens clarity.
Leave mother and father alone
@MarkJCarney and the Liberals love talking about “20 partnerships” and “22 nation building projects”. while Canada just slipped into a technical recession… two straight quarters of GDP contraction.
Grocery bills are crushing families, housing is unaffordable, and productivity is lagging.
All the global handshakes and high speed rail announcements in Quebec/Ontario won’t fix the basics for everyday Canadians struggling under years of Liberal mismanagement….
Empty buzzwords about “building” while the economy shrinks…..
@KellyPowersBPA I wouldn't worry to much about it man. I don't hold grudges and don't do harassment campaigns. I am always grateful when people have me on to discuss ideas even if it goes south sometimes. Good day.