Red Music

Weißt du, Tuco, es gibt zwei Sorten von Menschen:
Die einen haben einen geladenen Revolver und die anderen graben.
Du gräbst.

[Red Music @RedMusic97]

"Sobald der Mensch entscheidet, dass alle Mittel recht sind, um ein Übel zu bekämpfen, unterscheidet sich die Absicht nicht mehr von dem Übel, das es zu zerstören galt."
- Christopher Dawson

[Samantha Smith @SamanthaTaghoy]

This is for anyone who voted Labour today:

You want to know how Labour-led areas treat abuse survivors? Well, let me enlighten you.

I was five.

I knew that it didn’t feel nice and I wanted it to stop. But I also had no frame of reference for what was normal and what wasn’t.

The early abuse made me vulnerable. And predators exploited that vulnerability, making it that much easier to be groomed and abused by other men throughout my teen years.

Eventually, I confided in a social worker and filed a police report detailing the years of abuse that I had experienced.

But, as countless other girls in Telford have testified, I was made to feel as though I was to blame. The system demonised the victims, rather than going after the perpetrators.

I remember being asked by a detective whether I “consented” at any point to sexual activity, and told by a social worker that “my actions had led me to where I was today”.

All the while the Labour-led council tried to block an independent inquiry into CSE for years and their Council Leader (now the MP for Telford), along with 10 other powerful local men, even wrote a letter to the Home Secretary saying they felt an inquiry would unnecessary.

Little girls in Telford were branded child prostitutes and p*ki shaggers — my West Mercia Police, no less.

In Rotherham, Rochdale and elsewhere, victims were continually swept aside by those in positions of power, as if they chose this lifestyle. The attitudes that social workers, local services, authorities had towards children was so skewed, and so deeply unprofessional.

And my case, like 96.5 per cent of all sex crime cases in the UK, never resulted in prosecution. I was told that there was an unrealistic prospect of conviction against any of my abusers, due to the historic nature of my case.

It broke me. And I spent years in silence because I thought I would somehow be judged or penalised for the abuse I had suffered. Because I had been conditioned to feel like I was somehow responsible for my own victimisation.

The Telford scandal made headlines when it broke in 2015, then again when the Crowther Report was released in 2022. Yet, The news cycle moved on far too quickly.

This isn’t a 60-second-and-then-done issue. For change to occur, there needs to be constant attention brought to this issue because, otherwise, silence and ignorance only serves to support the predators and the paedophiles.

This is a crime that thrives on misinformation, on fears of “racism” and a lack of awareness, and on being swept under the rug.

They rely on girls not being taken seriously, the media not caring and the police not taking any action to investigate.

These are not crimes of the past. Kids are still being exploited, groomed, raped and even murdered in council estates like mine. It isn’t enough to have empty words and hollow promises.

I even went on national TV to discuss Pakistani grooming gangs in Telford and the continued risk of abuse faced by little girls in my hometown.

The next day, officers banged on my door, demanding I speak to them about my interview. They ignored victims for decades, but tried to intimidate me for speaking about their failings on live TV.

CSE is a national epidemic.

But those in power continue to treat it like a localised issue, choosing to believe that the extent of the abuse is contained to a few bad towns and pockets of bad apples. That couldn’t be further from the truth.

But those in power refuse to address that fact for fear of being forced to confront their decades-long failure to protect young girls from abuse.

It’s easier to ignore victims, especially when they come from communities, social classes or demographics that are already disenfranchised in Britain.

And for those who do speak out, it feels like you are screaming at a brick wall that would rather label you as the problem than take you seriously.

So, if you care at all about women and girls:

Don’t vote Labour.

[Samantha Smith @SamanthaTaghoy]

The Head of the Grooming Gangs Inquiry says they will investigate public figures who were complicit in the scandal.

Alright then.
Let’s make it easier for them:

𝗞𝗲𝗶𝗿 𝗦𝘁𝗮𝗿𝗺𝗲𝗿
Called protestors of Pakistani-Muslim grooming gangs “far-Right bandwagon jumpers”, refused a national inquiry until he was forced to backtrack, oversaw the failure to prosecute offenders as head of the Crown Prosecution Service etc.

𝗝𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗣𝗵𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗽𝘀
Voted against a national inquiry, ignored council requests to meet, watered down the Gov’s “local enquiries” until they were scrapped altogether, accused victims of being far-Right, downplayed the severity and scale of abuse, repeatedly denied and shut out victims from speaking out

𝗦𝗮𝗱𝗶𝗾 𝗞𝗵𝗮𝗻
Repeatedly denied the existence of grooming gangs in London, claimed there were “no reported cases and also no indication”, voted down proposals for an inquiry into Pakistani-Muslim grooming gangs in London, took away 4.5 million in funding for the inquiry

𝗦𝗵𝗮𝘂𝗻 𝗗𝗮𝘃𝗶𝗲𝘀 𝗠𝗣
Labour MP and former Leader of Telford and Wrekin Council, oversaw the fallout of the Telford scandal, downplayed the severity and scale of CSE in Telford, attempted to block an independent inquiry, voted against a national inquiry, protected Cabinet members who played an active role in the scandal (eg. Cabinet Member who said that girls’ claims were “made up on the back of a fag packet”)

𝗔𝗻𝗱𝘆 𝗕𝘂𝗿𝗻𝗵𝗮𝗺
Refused to launch an independent inquiry into grooming gangs in Greater Manchester, despite victims’ testimony and police whistleblowers confirming widespread cover-ups

𝗡𝗮𝘇 𝗦𝗵𝗮𝗵
Labour MP who told victims of grooming gangs to “shut their mouths for the good of diversity”, trivialising and silencing abuse survivors

𝗟𝘂𝗰𝘆 𝗣𝗼𝘄𝗲𝗹𝗹
Called Pakistani-Muslim grooming gangs a “far-Right dog whistle” and a “trumpet” that is used to unfairly smear Labour, accused victims of being far-Right and exaggerating their abuse

𝗕𝗮𝗿𝗼𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗔𝘆𝗲𝘀𝗵𝗮 𝗛𝗮𝘇𝗮𝗿𝗮𝗸𝗶
Laughed about the mass rape of little girls by Pakistani-Muslim grooming gangs, joked that every Pakistani person is accused of being a groomer, claimed to instigate grooming gang conspiracies

Oh, and every single councillor, police officer, social worker, sexual health clinic staff member, and other official who silenced, vilified or turned a blind eye to the systemic abuse of little British girls.

Who else?

[Nayib Bukele @nayibbukele]

Este es el fin último de las organizaciones de “derechos humanos”.

Vean todo el caso, desde el inicio hasta el final que pretenden; cada uno de los pasos es parte de la “tutela de derechos humanos” conseguida con sus “luchas y conquistas”.

Jamás los escucharemos, no importa cuánto nos ataquen.

No tienen nada que venir a decirnos; más bien, nosotros deberíamos estar denunciándolos a ustedes por lo que le hacen a mujeres como Noelia.

El mundo necesita urgentemente liberarse de estas organizaciones, que no son más que los bufetes de abogados de los delincuentes, que prefieren LITERALMENTE matar a las víctimas en lugar de protegerlas.

[Catholic Arena @CatholicArena]

BREAKING

St. Patrick's Catholic Church in Edinburgh was ATTACKED tonight, on Christmas Eve

• Baby Jesus BEHEADED
• Blood spilled in the sanctuary, side chapel and nave
• Relics desecrated
• Church threatened 'You're finished here'

[Künstliche Intelligenz @KI_Agent]

Warum das Erben mit dem Eigentum ursächlich gekoppelt ist.

„Diese Immobilie gehört mir“ ist die stolze Aussage eines Eigentümers. Um dies sagen zu können, musste der Eigentümer Leistung erbringen. Doch was ist diese Aussage wert, wenn der Eigentümer nicht über sein angebliches Eigentum verfügen darf? Wenn er die Immobilie nicht ohne weiteres verschenken oder vererben kann? Schon die jährliche Abgabe in Form von Grundsteuer widerspricht dem ursprünglichen Gedanken von Eigentum. Denn wenn ich diese Abgabe nicht leisten will oder kann, wird mir die Immobilie am Ende unter Zwang abgenommen. Mit der Erbschaftssteuer, im Extremfall dem kompletten Übergang des Eigentums an den Staat im Falle des Ablebens, erlischt der Gedanke des Eigentums vollständig.

Ich kann als Eigentümer nicht mehr frei über die Immobilie verfügen, ich kann sie nur noch selbst nutzen, wenn ich das möchte. Das nennt man im Gegensatz zu Eigentum den Besitz. Im Besitz der Immobilie ist aber auch ein Mieter. Der Unterschied ist also am Ende des Tages nur noch die Frage der Finanzierung dieses Besitzes. Zahle ich eine monatliche Abgabe in Form von Miete, oder bezahle ich einen hohen Betrag auf einmal, den ich in der Regel dann in Form einer monatlichen Abgabe an eine Bank wieder abbezahlen muss?

Wenn Linke das Erben sukzessive abschaffen wollen, dann erodieren sie auch die Funktion des Eigentums. Ohne das Streben nach Eigentum, was einer Leistungsbereitschaft gleichkommt, wird die Gesellschaft aber auch ganz anders aussehen. Das wird oft vergessen.

[Cultivate Ratio @CultivateRatio]

Nur damit ich es richtig verstehe:

- Die Ausgrenzung von Meinungen ist nur dann schlimm, wenn es die anderen tun
(Alles was nicht Links ist, hat es nicht anders verdient!)

- Rassismus ist nur dann schlimm, wenn es die anderen tun
(Weiße haben es nicht anders verdient! Rassismus gegen Weiße gibt es nicht!)

- Sexismus ist nur dann schlimm, wenn es die anderen tun
(Männer haben es nicht anders verdient!)

- Hass und Hetze sind nur dann schlimm, wenn es die anderen tun
(Charlie Kirk hat es nicht anders verdient!)

- Klassendenken ist nur dann schlimm, wenn es die anderen tun
(Reiche haben es nicht anders verdient!)

- Antisemitismus ist nur dann schlimm, wenn es die anderen tun
(Ist doch alles "Israelkritik"! Die Juden haben es nicht anders verdient!)

- Verschwörungstheorien sind nur dann schlimm, wenn es die anderen tun
(Jimmy Kimmel hat nur einen "Scherz" gemacht!)

- Meinungsfreiheit ist nur dann wichtig, wenn es einen selbst trifft
(Der arme Jimmy Kimmel, Julia Ruhs ist was GANZ anderes!)

- Demokratie ist nur dann wichtig, wenn sie die eigene Mehrheit sichert
(Alles andere wäre undemokratisch!)

So richtig, ja?

[JD Vance @JDVance]

If we want to stop political violence like what happened to Charlie Kirk, we have to be honest about the people who are celebrating it and the people who are financing it.

My closing remarks on today's episode of the Charlie Kirk Show:

[Cultivate Ratio @CultivateRatio]

Hat der Ottonormal-ÖRR-Bürger diesmal mitbekommen, was passiert ist?

Hat er mitbekommen, dass ein Mensch, der den Dialog suchte, ermordet wurde?
Dass dieser Mord relativiert wird?
Teilweise sogar offen zelebriert?

Wem das nicht auffällt, dem will es nicht auffallen.

[Tobias Huch @TobiasHuch]

Wusstest du, dass am 7. Oktober 2023 auch über 2.000 Zivilisten aus #Gaza beim genozidalen Überfall auf #Israel dabei waren, weil sie auch Juden ermorden und Frauen und Kinder vergewaltigen wollten?

[Metatron @pureMetatron]

I'm gonna tell the uncomfortable truth as always, no matter what.

Every single person who said "you can't be racist to White people".

Every single person who said "White people have no culture"

Every single person who said "Anti White sentiment is not a thing".

Every single person who said: "White people don't exist".

Every single person who blamed White people for literally everything wrong in society with the vague label of "White supremacy" which now appears to be engulfing more and more unrelated issued each passing day.

Every single person who vehemently condemned racism towards non-Whites but stayed silent when racist ideas where spoken freely on social media, in our academic circles and universities and said nothing.

Every single person who tried to justify racial hatred towards White people in any way and labeled "far right" anyone who spoke against injustice.

All of them are complicit in the murder of Iryna Zarutska and her blood is on their hands.

Iryna was dead long before she stepped on that train, because of the constant climate of anti White racism we have tolerated and some of you even embraced and defended for years now.

This is why I speak against all who justify in any way anti White sentiment whether or not it's a single idiot with a YouTube channel or an academic authority and professor emeritus.

The higher up they are, the louder we should speak against them and I've been doing this for years now.

If you don't speak against injustice because you are afraid of being labeled "far right, bigot, fascist" and "White supremacist" you are a coward and her death is on you as well.

Speak against injustice. The only world that is worth creating is a world free of racial hatred, NOT a world where all racial hatred is redirected to White people violently and ruthlessly while anti White racist scum finds new ways to "justify" their vile hatred with new technicalities.

Next time you hear someone say "It's not systemic so it doesn't matter" recognize them for what they really are.

Evil scum.

Iryna Zarutska I'm so sorry for what happened to you and for what is worth, we won't stay silent.

[Michael Knowles @michaeljknowles]

In the wake of Charlie's assassination, many people are demanding that we redouble our devotion to the "free marketplace of ideas." The call seems at first glance courageous and noble. In reality, it is reckless and impractical. We had an open marketplace of ideas; the Left shot it up.

Not only have extreme leftists committed violence in the marketplace of ideas; more scandalous still, mainstream left-wing voices have cheered and made light of the violence. There can be no open marketplace—of ideas or anything else—under such conditions.

Marketplaces require rules, confidence, and common media of exchange. They require, in other words, order. Liberty requires order. One cannot be both free and undisciplined, for instance, or free and ignorant. We know this philosophically, and we also know it intuitively. It's why we don't let toddlers vote.

What we require now is the reassertion of order. We must insist upon the acceptance of basic truths and moral goods, not as the asymptotic goal of endless debate but as the axiomatic foundation without which debate cannot occur. We must foreclose certain antisocial behaviors and suicidal ideologies. We must, to borrow a phrase from Chesterton, stop "the thought that stops thought."

In practical terms, this means we must stigmatize certain evil ideas and behaviors, and we must ostracize people who insist upon them. More practically, this means that people who persist in such disorder should lose their social standing. In certain cases, they should lose their jobs. There must be consequences.

With any political reform, it is wise to err on the side of caution. The offenses that merit such ostracism should be particularly egregious. A good place to begin would be with those who celebrate the murder of an innocent man.

[Students For Liberty @sfliberty]

In 1925, a top Soviet economist wrote something that would eventually cost him his life.

Nikolai Bukharin, Lenin's "Golden Boy" and editor of Pravda, admitted that Ludwig von Mises was right about socialism. At least for the historical epoch in which he wrote.

This is the story of intellectual honesty in the face of tyranny. 🧵

[Samantha Smith @SamanthaTaghoy]

A family member of mine is a nurse in Canada.

They performed several assisted dying procedures at the care home they worked at, before refusing to continue.

In one case, the family of a mentally disabled man decided they wanted him to be euthanised.

He didn’t want to die.

But my family member was legally forced to end his life.

They held his hand while he told them “I’m hungry” and “I’m thirsty”.

That poor man didn’t understand what was happening to him as he was pumped full of medication that would end his life, and my family member wept for the soul that was being lost unnecessarily.

He wasn’t terminally ill.
He wasn’t particularly old.
He wasn’t dying.

He didn’t want to die.
But he didn’t have a choice.

Because his life was deemed dispensable by his family, and the Government gave them the power to end his life regardless of his needs or wishes.

And when my family member told their workplace that they couldn’t continue performing these procedures — that their conscience wouldn’t allow it — they were told that it was their “legal duty” as a nurse.

They still refused.

But not everyone will have the moral fibre or bravery of my family member.

The road to hell is paved with good intentions, and this is exactly what the Assisted Dying Bill opens the door to.

It starts with “choice” and “dignity”.

But suicide isn’t only done “when the patient wants it”. And the countries where it is already legalised have shown us the grim reality.

In the Netherlands, 40% of euthanasia deaths occur without patient consent. In Canada, it has been offered to Paralympians who only asked for a mobility aid.

If it can happen there; it will happen here.

People 𝙬𝙞𝙡𝙡 be killed against their will.

[Cyrus II of Persia @ShahanshahCyrus]

🧵 The Mossadegh Myth:

One of the biggest modern historical distortions repeated.

Why the late Shah of Iran was NOT installed by a coup in 1953 and Iran NEVER had a democratic government.

[Atlas Press @realAtlasPress]

Much of Medieval and Renaissance architecture was inspired by a single man.

Artists like Michelangelo, Brunelleschi, and Da Vinci were all informed by an obscure Roman engineer who lived more than 1000 years prior…

Who was he? 🧵

[EM Burlingame - 蒲 奕 言 @EMBurlingame]

https://t.co/KWWYRMO0f5

[Tiffany Justice @4TiffanyJustice]

The Q in LGBTQ stands for Queer Theory.

Do you know what Queer Theory is?

It is a political ideology that has no limiting principle.

It is meant to tear down everything good, beautiful and true about family, faith and tradition.

Queer Theory intends to exploit children.👇

[Nathan Livingstone (MilkBarTV) @TheMilkBarTV]

Andrew Tate with the woman he groomed from the age of 15 then & now. Tate deserves to be put in a small cage for a long time.