@Bratt_world@mashakleiner@One_BCHQ So, you have absolutely no intelligent response or rebuttal to a legitimate question? Just a weak appeal to emotion with no relevant facts? Typical.
@Jhardman486@RudiBoy05@iampolaris1069@Breaking57@FBI@FBIDirectorKash Outside on a public sidewalk? Nobody said it’s not worrisome, but it’s also not illegal to film on public property.
What IS illegal tho is the physically aggressive posturing displayed by the employee, followed by ongoing harassment and potential threats of violence.
@SeriouslyMeek@helpme1976@mario4thenorth Gets called out with facts. Immediately defaults to a baseless ad hominem attack with absolutely no substance our counterpoint. I bet everyone takes you and your ideas very seriously. lol 🤡
@1963Canuck@rowleyshadow@thematrixb0t You can’t even debate the simplest idea without resorting to overly emotional, juvenile name calling. I guess it’s easier for you to protect your overly fragile ego by blocking everyone pointing out your obvious ignorance. I look forward to receiving my magat status and block.
@Cybrog8o7@MKlingbell886@yegwave Actual treason - not your hyperbolic, pearl-clutching misinterpretation of it - involves using force or violence to overthrow the government. Alberta is peacefully following the democratic process. No force or violence involved. But you knew that already, didn’t you, Steve? 😉
@RailBourbon@Crowsky13@MorbidKnowledge Stealing anything is wrong. Steal something that’s not yours and karma will eventually pull up to take back what you owe her, sometimes rather quickly. Nobody said anything about killing thieves, you hyperbolic coward. Just delivering some good old fashioned non-lethal justice.
@FitFatTony2@CandiBRed People were unjustly laid off and lives were destroyed for not participating in this invasive, irreversible failed global experiment, including not disclosing private medical information to their employer, you “absolutely useless brain dead cunt.” Spare me your juvenile outrage.
@HellXJohnson@pebbles9677@WallStreetApes A grown man with an inflated sense of self importance avoids answering a simple question because the grammar isn’t to his liking. Interesting!
@Bellrules@TheresaWarring@BertaProudDad Proof of the “potentially criminal behaviour” you claim is occurring. That’s how the burden of proof works when you make an accusation. An intelligent person is usually prepared to back their claim up with things like facts and evidence.
@JackDangerLIVE@AngelusHector@RogerBernards Uhhh, you mean keyboard warriors like yourself? The irony here is palpable and made even more hilarious by the fact that you can’t even grasp it.
@Velvet_Calamity@mattlabelle Nice strawman. Nobody is arguing the geometry here. It’s the PROCESS being incorrectly/inconsistently applied on a huge stage. No goal light. No definitive ref pointing/signalling a goal. The call is no goal on the ice, then video review. Video is inconclusive. No goal.
@cadmiumfalcon@johnref59@jasondemers5 Nope. The refs couldn’t have seen it cross so close from that distance away. No goal light on. No pointing to signal a goal. Should have been no goal on the ice, and challenged to video review. You can extrapolate and assume it crossed, but the video does not “clearly” show this.
@6thShitPosting@alter3d@JakeLandauTO You might want to do a bit of historical research on the beliefs of the original scientists who brought us the first rockets, among many others.