Red

Most of people and organisations I follow with heart felt interest... the others are to see what kind of dodgy stuff they're are up to.

[Red @Redmo1000]

@VitaApro @WomenReadWomen @jowaller12 There's no conflating for TIMs

[Randolf Patton @RandolfPatton]

@WomenReadWomen Let's face it, the whole "woman trapped in a man's body" bulls**t was first floated by very dystonic homosexual men like Lars Ulrichs and Magnus Hirschfeld. And no wonder.

Hell, we can't even overcome sex role stereotypes and expectations NOW, let alone a 100 years ago.

[LadyLuck'sFortuneCookies @LadySoLucky]

@WomenReadWomen

[Genevieve Gluck @WomenReadWomen]

@nejafeja It's no fun if you don't have a woman validating an exhibitionistic humiliation fetish

[Genevieve Gluck @WomenReadWomen]

Yes! There were many! So many. From the 70's the organizations spread across the US, UK, and Australia. Some of the transvestite groups were explicitly opposed to homosexual men joining, after the policy created by Virginia Prince, because they wanted to downplay the role of sex in transvestic fetishism.

The father of transgenderism, Virginia Prince aka Arnold Lowman, saw homosexuality as an aberration. But according to his original framework, it was necessary to bring women, especially wives and children, into programs intended to make them sympathetic to men with crossdressing fetishes.

I talked about that a bit in this video.
https://t.co/dTbKkAXQJW

[Genevieve Gluck @WomenReadWomen]

A history lesson:

"The Journal of Male Feminism", originally titled "Hose and Heel", was published from 1980 with the explicit support of Paul Allen Walker, a gay man and early founder of the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH).

The origins of WPATH can be traced directly to the University of Minnesota. During the 1980's, transvestites would send their wives for re-education to sexology programs that groomed the women to accept their husbands' fetish.

The same sentiment behind "The Journal of Male Feminism" is what caused the creep into US universities' decision to promote gender identity ideology and rebrand "Women's Studies" to "Gender Studies", as the origin of so-called transgenderism came directly from sexology programs already embedded in those institutions - with universities in California and Minnesota serving as the hubs in the early days.

[Genevieve Gluck @WomenReadWomen]

Women have been targeted for conditioning since the 1960's. Psychiatrists advised them against leaving their transvestite husbands, even when they were abusive. They often couldn't afford to divorce, anyway.

Third wave "feminism" came out of universities beginning in the 90's - shortly after Women's Studies programs were renamed to "Gender Studies." Gender being a term popularized by sexologists and psychiatrists, not feminists.

The first "gender clinics" opened at universities in the 60's. "Gender identity" was added to the DSM in 1980.

Which means even academic feminism was one of the last major institutions to embrace GI: after the APA, after universities, after the medical establishment - all dominated by men during the time.

The insult created by trans activists labels women "TERFs" - the wrong kind of feminist.

Most people who are punished for speaking out are women. Women are silenced across social media, banned, no-platformed from speaking events.

Most people who blame women or feminism for GI never talk about the role of porn, sexology, or the APA.

Which to me, reads like misogyny, rather than a nuanced perspective.

You'll rarely, if ever, hear such people talk about Arnold Lowman, Paul Allen Walker, Harry Benjamin, Stanley Biber, John Oliven, Volkmar Sigusch, Vern Bullough, Erwin Gohrbandt, John Money, Eli Coleman, Walter Bockting, or Mark Bowers, to name just a few.

It's just "What about Judith Butler?" on loop.

[Palumba @Palumbus_Pics]

Saw these two very in love wood pigeons and I can’t get over how cute they are. #woodpigeon #birds #naturephotography

[Graham Linehan @Glinner]

"Consensus is just the silence holding" is only one of the brilliant lines in this video.

[Westaf @Galsen_24]

She tried to play the discrimination card on a cop... it backfired completely. 💀
Watch until the end.

[Red @Redmo1000]

@Gaynotqueer1

[Richard Dawkins @RichardDawkins]

https://t.co/j58CYkil13
Man attempts to behead another man in the street.

"No evidence of terror at this stage, say police"

If that isn’t terror, what is? How much more terrifying does it need to be to qualify as terror?

[Centre for Migration Control @migrationCtrl]

🚨BBC: Asylum seekers "are more likely to commit crime".

We first published our research last year on the link between open borders and crime. The BBC was silent.

They have now been forced by reality - kicking and screaming - to report our findings and admit the link.

[Red @Redmo1000]

@BreitbartNews It's amazing how little RTD writes for women, the air time his (Leo's) Aunt Lydia 'fluffers' got on #TipToe was dismissive- theyre mere support vehicles/shields for his (always) gay male protagonist propoganda. Wasn't on the nose at all- plenty of LGB reject false teaming of TQ+

[Lee Anderson MP @LeeAndersonMP_]

This aged well..

On the day Labour have turned their backs on our WASPI women this video has resurfaced.

They cannot lie straight in bed.

[JJD @JD8077]

@RachelReevesMP https://t.co/QeaC02fNfA

[Enezator @Enezator]

Every doctor and nurse should experience this at least once before telling me what I should or shouldn’t be doing every day. 🩺

[Neale Hanvey🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 @JNHanvey]

This is the inevitable result when you inject deeply unpopular woke ideology into a family favourite franchise. No one wants to be lectured, they want to be entertained.

Russell T Davies says ‘goodbye’ to Doctor Who as 2026 Christmas special is axed.
https://t.co/IKMWnMwyZf

[Fandom Pulse @fandompulse]

Trans activist Jinx Monsoon on Doctor Who losing fans over its identity politics:

"Numbers are not shrinking. For every transphobic, racist, bigoted 'Doctor Who' fan that we lose this season, there are going be three to five new fans who are coming in for the representation. So to those fans — who are not fans — I say, “Don’t let the door hit you on the way out.”

Did this comment age well?

[Prof. Gary Francione @garylfrancione]

What is so disturbing is that I have not seen you ever attempt to respond substantively to the arguments about how trans ideology threatens women's rights and requires that people buy into the metaphysical beliefs of others--which is in fundamental opposition to a liberal pluralistic society. You just repeat the same old trans slogans. Slogans aren't arguments. You are a Member of Parliament. You have an obligation to conduct the discussion on a level that you consistently fail to meet.