🎃かぼちゃ🎃 🌸

[🎃かぼちゃ🎃 🌸 @ReedTrende]

身近な人が嫌な目に遭う夢しか見なくて不安になる。

[WashU Medicine Division of Infectious Diseases @WashUMedID]

Jacco Boon, PhD, a professor of medicine, and colleagues have developed a tool to study how viruses spread by “barcoding” individual virus particles and tracking their transmission from individual to individual.
https://t.co/NEqps8DJSl

[Waggoner Lab @LabWaggoner]

Barcoded SARS-CoV-2 enables precise, quantitative studies of transmission
https://t.co/wcViUQBCGm
@ScienceAdvances

[🎃かぼちゃ🎃 🌸 @ReedTrende]

@GUstaoset @BretWeinstein @Fragtastik The original trials didn’t use the slight-of-hand described by Fenton, and even if they did they were long enough that it would’ve had a tiny impact on their results. Fenton’s critique is nowhere near sufficient evidence to say “vax efficacy was largely a statistical artifact”

[🎃かぼちゃ🎃 🌸 @ReedTrende]

@GUstaoset @BretWeinstein @Fragtastik I have many issues with your table that are afield of my main point. To make my critique more specific: independent of other objections to the trials, in Darkhorse 179, Bret seems to think the problem Fenton pointed out invalidates the original vax trials. This is just an error.

[🎃かぼちゃ🎃 🌸 @ReedTrende]

@BretWeinstein @Fragtastik Hey Bret - the degree of biasing from counting people as unvax’d for 2wks post-vax heavily depends on study duration. A 3wk study could have a major false signal, but a 3mo study would have almost none. So Pfizer and Moderna’s original studies were affected pretty little by this

[🎃かぼちゃ🎃 🌸 @ReedTrende]

@Alien_Scientist @BretWeinstein I have nothing to add to your conversations with West and Kay, they speak for themselves. Just wanted to make sure people didn’t miss some key info on what kind of conspiracy-hypothesizing Bret seems to think is rational and in-bounds