Roman Catholics, Eastern Orthodox, and many atheists make a similar argument when it comes to Biblical canon: "The Church existed first and had the authority to determine what books belonged in the Bible."
But the reality is different. God inspired the writing of Scripture. The books already had authority the moment the pen hit the papyrus. The canon was decided by God before any councils came together — they just recognized what already was authoritative.
Flipping this around, and making the Church itself the supreme authority, creates issues. This creates a system where the true authority is the institutional body — it gets to decide what is "Christian" and what is not. This is why we have people joining these churches despite disagreeing with their doctrines. "At least I'm in the right church."
But that was never how Christ's Church was structured.
Jesus is our High Priest. He is the cornerstone of the church. He is God. Scripture is God-breathed and is infallible and inerrant. It is the standard by which all things are to be judged.
This is why the Bereans were commended. They tested Paul's teachings woth Scripture.
Acts 17:11
Now these Jews were more noble than those in Thessalonica; they received the word with all eagerness, examining the Scriptures daily to see if these things were so.
Let's be like the Bereans and hold God's Word as our supreme authority.
🚨Ilhan Omar’s sister founded a business which secured more than $20 million in govt funding for “health” projects
Guess where her company was registered?
The SAME address used by feeding our future fraudsters…
You cannot make this up
Since there is a little chatter going on on X about the sin of schism, this is a good time to remember the principled, godly, Scriptural, confessional, catholic-spirited, churchly argument of the PCA founders in the Message to All Churches (1973).
"When a denomination will not exercise discipline and its courts have become heterodox or disposed to tolerate error, the minority finds itself in the anomalous position of being submissive to a tolerant and erring majority. In order to proclaim the truth and to practice the discipline which they believe obedience to Christ requires, it then becomes necessary for them to separate. This is the exercise of discipline in reverse. It is how we view our separation.
Some of our brethren have felt that the present circumstances do not yet call for such a remedy. They remain in the Presbyterian Church in the United States. We trust they will continue to contend for the faith, though our departure makes their position more difficult. We express to them our hope that God will bless their efforts, and that there may come a genuine spiritual awakening in the Presbyterian Church in the United States.
We trust that our departure may cause those who control and direct the programs and policies of the Presbyterian Church in the United States to reexamine their own position in the light of the Word. Our prayer is that God may use this movement to promote spiritual awakening, not only in the new Church, but also in that from which we have separated. If in the providence of God, such were to occur, we would gladly acknowledge that the grounds for separation and division would have to be reassessed.
We declare also that we believe the system of doctrine found in God’s Word to be the system known as the Reformed Faith. We are committed without reservation to the Reformed Faith as set forth in the Westminster Confession and Catechisms. It is our conviction that the Reformed faith is not sectarian, but an authentic and valid expression of Biblical Christianity. We believe it is our duty to seek fellowship and unity with all who profess this faith. We particularly wish to labor with other Christians committed to this theology."
Most people in the comments missing the point here: Luther didn’t remove books from the Bible and Trent didn’t add them. Before Trent and its addition of the anathema clause it was always an open conversation. The 66 is what everyone agreed upon, the question was about the apocrypha (a term not invented by but clarified on by Athanasius in his 39th Festal Letter in AD 367 to describe the other books of the OT outside of the 39). If the 73 canon was, as many in the comments to my OP want to reductionistically claim, a settled issue going back centuries then you wouldn’t have the Jeromes, Athasiuses, Cyrils, Gregory the Greats, Ximenes, and Cajetans of the world all openly discussing and disagreeing with various Deuterocanonicals and their inclusion vs. exclusions as inspired canon. These aren’t randoms, they’re Saints, Bishops, Popes, Cardinals, and Doctors of the Church.
I think a lot of people would be surprised to hear how close the vote on their inclusion in an official list attached to an anathema was at Trent. At the Council of Trent, considerable debate took place on whether a distinction should be made between two classes of books (canonical and apocryphal) or whether three classes should be identified (Acknowledged Books; the Disputed Books of the New Testament, later generally received; and the Apocrypha of the Old Testament). Finally on 8 April 1546, by a vote of 24 to 15, with 16 abstensions, the Council issued a decree (De Canonicis Scripturis) in which, for the first time in the history of the Church, the question of the contents of the Bible was made an absolute article of faith and confirmed by an anathema.
My brother in Christ, don’t take the black pill. Elon Musk is offering Mel Gibson 100 million to make The Odyssey, but without transblenders & DEI hires.
I love this timeline.
From now on — whenever a democrat says that illegal aliens aren’t registering to vote —
you now have undeniable proof that New Jersey registered 6,600 illegal aliens to vote.
@BoLoudon When right wingers are upset that Trump isn't doing enough, I understand the frustration. We have to also remember the insane culture shift though and how important that is. More work to do but don't black pill.
If someone made a movie set in Africa and based on ancient African folklore, and then populated the cast with white people and other random races and ethnicities that have nothing to do with Africa, everyone would say that the casting is ridiculous and distracting at best (and I would agree). Yet the same thing is done in the reverse to a foundational text of western civilization and even conservatives line up to defend it. It’s pathetic, honestly.
Ferrán Torres, who scored the game winning goal at the World Cup, is wearing a “Make Spain Great Again” hat right now at the victory parade in Madrid.
This is amazing.
The media’s heads are going to explode 🤣
It’s time to expose the Charlie Kirk conspiracy machine that makes $ by lying about his murder.
I’ve had enough and Charlie deserves better.
Unlike them, any monetization from this will go to his kids (if his team can arrange) or a cause that Charlie loved. Here’s the truth ⬇️
More promises for the future everyone. Hold tight for the evidence!
More “the lack of evidence is the evidence”.
The receipt is real. Trust her!
That was not the question. Although that is a fair question to ask in due course.
The question was whose receipt is it.
Apparently, we can ask all the questions, except for what evidence you have to substantiate your claims @RealCandaceO
Since I have your attention again, you didn’t answer the question: were you wrong on the date of the Dairy Queen photograph?
Also, did the Egyptian planes hold the key to Charlie Kirk’s assassination, like you said?
I too love the eternity of the Internet.