@viciousSid111 Well, she's not saying that it is a response to mass migration, it is the products of mass migration looking for an excuse to riot. But you will watch blacks raze civilization to the ground and justify it using your mental gymnastics.
Question: "I agree that we need strict immigrations laws. However, I am trying to understand the argument for white nationalism in a county that wasn't necessarily claimed exclusively for white men. E.g., is there a moral argument against law abiding Indians/Mexicans becoming a majority?"
Answer: Yes, absolutely. It violates the most general and inarguable moral law ever to exist: the Golden Rule.
The Golden Rule says that If you don't want people who look and sound like us to export our culture to your country and shove it down your throats using your political system and your money, then we don't have to put up with that from you either, and if you push it, we have a God-given right to force the issue.
Those who have come here and failed to completely assimilate need to go home. We have the right of self-determinacy, we never voted for "multiculturalism", and we want no part of it.
This includes migrants from Africa, South Asia, East Asia, Latin America, and the Middle East. It even includes Israel - we let Jews into the US long before 1948, and they have no reason to expect a belated exception now that their true feelings about us ("We hate you, goyim! Die, Amalek!") have become crystal clear.
When our guests tell us that they hate us, we have every right to protect ourselves by any means necessary. If they're entitled, then so are we.
@scientificecon@Handre I fully agree. However, how would one sell this policy to a voter base knowing full well it will collapse the housing market? It needs to collapse I know, but you cannot do anything without power and you cannot attain power without votes.
@KeenyDhk@RealAussie78@antigenderist Well, it’s that they don’t keep to their own. They spread satans gospel and have a massive over representation of paedophiles within their ranks
@Steve_Laws_ But you need to have control of these propaganda channels prior to taking power. They will be doing everything in their power to keep you at bay
@GasMaskNat Why would we want to be the less radical solution? All attempts short of NS are bound to fail and when they do they will look further to the right.
The purity of the party is not being compromised by working with a different party. You can retain intra party purity.
@redactedtake Even acknowledging racism as a legitimate moral qualm is adopting leftist rhetoric. It’s a term invented to shame and control the discourse by communists
@GasMaskNat Yeh blindly trusting jews in any capacity doesn’t work. But knowing they will betray you, you can still temporarily leverage a partnership.
Australians will want to “try a less radical solution” first, in the form of one nation. No point going head to head to remain “pure.”
Thomas Sewell says if the White Australia Party wins its High Court case, it will assist the creation of a Pauline Hanson prime ministership.
"Keep Pauline honest"
Follow: @NoticerNews