ResistTX444 #LockHimUp

Blue dot in a RED state. Liberté Egalité Fraternité. Followed by @BarackObama, the best Prez ever. #ALLLIVESMATTER #mybodymychoice #resister #voteblue

[Barack Obama @BarackObama]

To George and Laura, Bill and Hillary — we're grateful for your friendship, counsel, and devotion to this country. And to Joe and Jill, thank you for being on this journey with us.

[UmdarTamker @UmdarTamker]

They spent $75 billion fighting Iran, then another $300 billion rebuilding Iran, just to reopen the Strait of Hormuz that was already open before the war started.

USA the superpower 🤡🤡😂😂

[Anonymous @YourAnonNews]

On camera, Don Jr. pulls out a little baggie with white powder at his father's birthday party.

[J @jasonllevin]

Do You Support the Decision by the NY Knicks?

[Covie @covie_93]

A picture is worth a thousand words....

[philip lewis @Phil_Lewis_]

The performers for the Obama Presidential Library opening on June 18 have been announced:

Stevie Wonder
John Legend
Jennifer Hudson
The Roots
Bruce Springsteen
Christina Aguilera
Marsai Martin
Common
U2’s Bono and The Edge
Eddie Vedder
Marc Anthony
Tems

[ResistTX444 #LockHimUp @ResistTX444]

THIS.

[Democratic Coalition @TheDemCoalition]

That's a great observation.

The right's screaming outrage about DEI is not about qualifications, it's really all about racism

And this is proof positive right here.

#FightTheRight

[Gianl1974 @Gianl1974]

Say what?

A 28-minute election analysis circulating online has sparked debate by suggesting that Kamala Harris may have won the 2024 U.S. presidential election and that Donald Trump's victory could warrant further examination.

The presentation was delivered by Nathan Taylor, Executive Director of Public Engagement for the Election Truth Alliance, who cited precinct-level heat maps, statistical models, and election data analysis to support his claims. According to Taylor, certain voting patterns observed in the election appeared different from trends typically expected in large-scale electoral data.

The analysis argues that elections often follow predictable statistical distributions when voter turnout is compared with candidate vote share. Taylor contends that some 2024 results displayed patterns that merit additional review and discussion.

The claims have generated significant attention online. Supporters say the findings deserve closer examination and independent analysis, while critics argue that statistical anomalies alone do not prove election misconduct and that extraordinary claims require strong, verifiable evidence.

At this time, the allegations remain disputed, and no official findings have concluded that the outcome of the 2024 election was altered by fraud or irregularities. The debate continues to highlight broader questions about election transparency, public trust, and the interpretation of complex voting data. #BreakingNews #CurrentEvents #DonaldTrump #USPolitics #GovernmentAccountability

[Sarrah Bellus @sarrah_bellus]

I'm gonna post this everyday so MAGA never forgets what Trump did on Jan 6

[Suzie rizzio @Suzierizzo1]

These are all programs that Trump has cut funding for and I’m curious where all this money went! Why aren’t we asking questions. Why isn’t Congress asking questions! 🤬

[ResistTX444 #LockHimUp @ResistTX444]

Enough is enough. #25AmendmentNow

[Joe G @EastEndJoe]

Any suggestions?

[Don Winslow @donwinslow]

Dear Republicans...

[ResistTX444 #LockHimUp @ResistTX444]

@ML3democrats @BluebonnetsTx8 Done

[Andrew Weinstein @Weinsteinlaw]

Joe Biden literally wrote a memo telling staff that he’d be disappointed in them if they missed family milestones because of work.

[Lovable Liberal and his Old English sheepdog @DougWahl1]

Our Quote of the Day:

Your Thoughts?

[Willie Ross Jr. Knee Deep @RossKneeDeep]

By Jasmine Crockett:

"Hey Tim Scott,

You spent years tap dancing through every interview, every speech, every Sunday show appearance telling America that racism was basically over and that your success story proved everybody else just needed to work harder and complain less.

You carried water for people who mocked civil rights, demonized poor people, gutted diversity programs, attacked voting rights, and treated Black history like a disease.

And for what?

No VP slot.
No cabinet throne.
No real power.
Not even basic respect.

You confessed your admiration on national television for people who viewed you as nothing more than a convenient talking point — the “See? We have one!” guy standing in the background smiling on cue.

Then the second you showed the smallest trace of independence and questioned that disgusting Obama monkey post, your own side turned on you like starving wolves.

Suddenly the loyal house servant wasn’t loyal enough.

Now you’re sitting in a car recording cellphone videos reminding the world that you’re still Black.

Trust us, Senator — nobody forgot.

The problem is that you spent so much time trying to convince other people that racism wasn’t real that now, when it smacks you directly in the face, you want sympathy from the same community you lectured for years.

You defended the people stripping away protections for minorities, women, the poor, and working-class families. You stood beside people cheering the destruction of programs our grandparents marched, bled, and died for.

And now you look shocked that the crowd you entertained never actually saw you as an equal.

The Bible talks about the Prodigal Son returning home after losing everything.

But the Prodigal Son came home humble.
You spent years helping burn the house down.

And now you’re politically homeless:
too Black for the people you defended,
too eager to defend them for the people you abandoned.

That’s the tragedy of selling your dignity for a seat at a table that was never meant for you.

Tim, you may be the PRODIGAL SON, BUT YOU CAN’T COME HOME."

We saw it coming. He didn't want to.

[ADHD Champ @adhdchamp]

@Dark_Tidings___ @ML3democrats You clearly didn't study history. Democrats used to be a racist southern party, now Republicans have taken that on with gusto.