The US government, citing national security authorities, has issued an export control directive to suspend all access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5 by any foreign national, whether inside or outside the United States, including foreign national Anthropic employees.
The net effect of this order is that we must abruptly disable Fable 5 and Mythos 5 for all our customers to ensure compliance.
Access to all other Claude models is not affected.
We apologize for this disruption to our customers. We believe this is a misunderstanding and are working to restore access as soon as possible.
Read our full statement: https://t.co/bwn0sximKZ
Introducing Claude Fable 5: a Mythos-class model that we’ve made safe for general use.
Its capabilities exceed those of any model we’ve ever made generally available.
Our internal data shows Claude is accelerating AI development—a possible path to recursive self-improvement, or AI autonomously building a more capable successor.
It’s happening faster than we thought, and the implications deserve greater attention. https://t.co/OVVPJO7VQx
Stop being retarded, start Retardmaxing
Being retarded means you’re ruminating and overthinking your decision
Retardmaxing means you’re making decisions based on your gut instinct — zero rumination, zero regrets
Stop being retarded, start #Retardmaxing
Dangerous game, my 20x max plan will be maxxed out before reset every single week.
Anthropic will bleed money on me.
3minutes = 2m+ token burn on an audit with /workflows
Also new in Claude Code: dynamic workflows (research preview).
For the hardest tasks, Claude makes a plan, runs hundreds of parallel subagents, and verifies its work before reporting back. Think a migration touching hundreds of files.
Read more: https://t.co/7gt06kGkDN
In the next 3-5 years Richard Millie will also downgrade and MB&F will take their place as the enthusiasts timepiece. I got allocated a SP-One and extremely tempted to pull the trigger but the wait is 18months. The access behind owning an MB&F is amazing too.
F.P. Journe gray market is in a huge bubble, dealers and gray market prices are at 100k+ while retail is 20k for the Elegante. All the dealers in Texas cant sell any of their F.P. Journes past few years. Amazing watches will def try the retail journey this year.
The thing the market still probably hasn’t fully priced in is the fact that the economic utility of AI is extremely nonlinear—as we approach and pass human general cognitive capabilities, the willingness to pay for AI goes up 100x+. We’re very close.
There will be a lot more to this website longer term. And eventually we'll hire a dedicated design guy. But we have the first version of the https://t.co/RSClRZ1owu website up!
The Militia Long/Short Equity ETF has launched! The ticker symbol is $ORR and it just began trading.
The strategy is similar to my hedge fund, investing in global stocks up to 150% long and 100% short. This strategy will typically have lower correlation and beta to the market than most public investments. This means that during a strong bull run $ORR will have a tough time keeping up. But in a weak market $ORR is expected to outperform.
My reasons for launching $ORR rather than growing my hedge fund:
Many of the investments in my hedge fund are illiquid and I won’t be able to trade them if my hedge fund grows too big. This is why I’ve been turning away new investors. However, well over half of my bets scale well and $ORR will invest in that portion.
The $ORR ETF will have a lower edge due to its larger scale, and thus it has a much lower fee to match. I have a strong opinion that hedge fund fees are incompatible with large AUM generally, not just for my fund. Most people don’t know it but Buffett pointed out that even Berkshire’s track record would have been mediocre with hedge fund type fees. This is by far the biggest reason I want to launch an ETF. I want to do right for the people investing with me, who are trusting me with their money, rather than sell out like most other hedge fund managers do.
The $ORR ETF has less risk than my hedge fund because it uses less leverage and isn’t short many microcap stocks, which can have extreme volatility. This is a more appealing product to risk averse investors.
The ETF vehicle has many benefits: Simplified, favorable taxes for the ETF holder. Can be owned on margin and in retirement accounts. Daily liquidity. Due diligence on ETFs is simpler than hedge funds, convenient for institutional investors. Compliance isn’t an issue for institutional investors. Allows me to rebalance longs without a tax hit. Both very small and very large investors can join, neither of which could invest in my hedge fund.
Expenses stated in the prospectus:
The 1.3% management fee is accurate, which is around .65%/year fee per 100% gross leverage managed.
The 18.84% gross expense ratio is very misleading. These items cause the stated expenses to be very high but are not real economic costs:
1. When a stock or ETF that I’m short pays a dividend it gets counted as an expense. In reality, whenever dividends are paid the underlying stock or ETF drops by roughly the same amount. Thus, the real economics are neutral. The ETF will be heavily short high dividend investments at the start.
2. When I short a stock or an ETF, I am paying to borrow the shares. On average, my larger scale shorts cost 1%/year to borrow. This is considered an expense. However, when I short sell I am simultaneously borrowing shares from one guy and selling them to someone else. That someone else pays cash for these shares, which the ETF holder earns interest on. Thus, I will be earning a positive carry on that short. But the way the “expense” gets calculated, the interest earned from being short does not offset the cost of borrowing.
3. The margin interest paid for being over 100% gross long. Unlike the first two items, this is a real expense but the expected return of the stocks we own is higher than the interest cost.
Frankly, the way the expense ratio gets calculated in the ETF prospectus is nonsensical. Regulators should update this number to better reflect reality. But since they don’t, and since most people do not understand this, ETF managers are reluctant to do anything in their portfolio that causes this official number to go up. Well, I say to hell with that. I’m just going to do whatever I think has the maximum expected value even if this hurts marketing to many potential investors.
Points about the $ORR ETF at launch:
* Until the ETF reaches ~$50-$150 million AUM, I will not be able to short more than 10 individual stocks or ETFs. This is due to the unusual mechanics of short selling in an ETF vehicle and associated implied cost. Thus, $ORR will be shorting mostly bad ETFs in its early days. This isn’t so bad. There’s a big edge in shorting some of these bad ETFs and I even make these same big bets in my hedge fund. But I want to be transparent: the ETF won’t have its full edge until we hit a bit larger scale.
* While the ETF has low AUM you should be careful with trade execution. Do not use market orders. You will get the best fills if you use limit orders and buy between 10 AM and 3:30 PM ET. If you're buying in large size, contact your broker and do a Request for Quote (RFQ) to get best execution. Also, if you want to invest >$10 million and want more liquidity, you can reach out to me and I can help coordinate with a market maker.
Regulation on public posts, or why I haven’t posted about the ETF until now:
Every post I make about the ETF needs to get approval, including replies to questions in this thread. The turnaround time for approval is 5 days and costs money. Thus, I won’t be able to reply to your questions here. Instead, I will gather a list of questions and write up a FAQ.
Oddly, I am allowed to reply to questions on podcasts. If you run a podcast and want to discuss the ETF, I’d like to go on.
-
Thanks to Sam Lee @svrnco for partnering with me on this. Besides financially backing it, there was an awful lot of overhead work and other hurdles when launching an ETF. He did a great job handling most of that work so that I could focus on investing.
For more information about ORR ETF, a prospectus, fees and risks https://t.co/4PSxwqroLL
It's so over.
Anthropic just sent patches for FFmpeg supposedly using their latest model, Claude Mythos. The code quality is indistinguishable from top level engineers.
If these really were found and written by AI, things are about to get really weird, really fast.
@orrdavid@MikeFritzell Yep best thing for coding, research, general info. It’s easy to transfer all your data/memory through their settings from ChatGPT to Claude. Gemini for image generation. Perplexity for Power points, Slides, etc.