Dan Hall

Formerly D.Nerd. Author of A Nerdinary life

[Manvir Bains ²⁰🏆 @MannyBLFC]

Pep Guardiola pulling up to Jürgen Klopp's villa in Majorca

[Manchester City @ManCity]

The greatest to ever do it. Thank you, Pep 🩵

Pinch and zoom to catch every detail 🔎✨

[Manchester City @ManCity]

"What a time we have had together." 🩵

[Manchester City @ManCity]

Pep Guardiola 🐐

[Dan Hall @ReverendNerd]

The greatest manager in the history of the premier league and football in general. Played the best football ever in the prem. What a fucking man

[Manchester City @ManCity]

Pep Guardiola to step down after incredible decade as City Manager 🩵

🔗 https://t.co/u84AZYY23t

[Tom @tomvinall00]

FIVE YEARS LATER we’re in the same situation 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[Visegrád 24 @visegrad24]

The BBC portrays an indebted Afghan father selling his 7-year-old twin daughters into sexual slavery with adult men as a man who is forced to make difficult choices

🇦🇫

[morally grey @knowncougar]

literally how can it get bleaker than this

[Rob Schmitt @SchmittNYC]

Billions of people around the world are poor. They don’t sell their daughters to be raped by old men. BBC is disgusting for covering this with empathy.

[Dan Hall @ReverendNerd]

Anyone that donates to this a fucking mong

[patricridge @PatricRidge]

He's played 46 minutes in the Premier League.

[Dan Hall @ReverendNerd]

Scum of the earth

[London & UK Street News @CrimeLdn]

A dad has been found guilty of murdering his 5 week old daughter

Sean Jefferson, 35, of Walsall was found guilty of murdering Darcy, who had over 40 sustained rib fractures, and both her legs were fractured.

He be sentenced at a later date.

[AG @AGHamilton29]

Just so people understand what happened here:

These women claimed asylum because they were likely to be tortured and killed for a gesture standing up to the regime. The regime then started kidnapping their families instead to force them to come home and face likely execution.

[Dan Hall @ReverendNerd]

Was just about to retweet this and then realised I’m 30 in 5 months, young person status long gone

[grace @ChelsGraceO]

As a young person, what does the UK actually offer us?

[GB Politics @GBPolitcs]

🚨NEW: The Green Party would drop the Church of England’s status as Britain’s established church if it wins the next general election

[@DailyMail]

[Throwback Iran @Tarikh_Eran]

Why aren’t football journalists covering this story?

3 weeks ago member of Iranian national football team, Rashid Mazaheri, posted a story on IG against Khamenei.

The regime kidnapped him and he has not been seen since, his wife is demanding answers and if he’s still alive.

[The Free Speech Union @SpeechUnion]

📣🚨The Free Speech Union is mounting a legal challenge against the Government over its official definition of Islamophobia — now repackaged as 'anti-Muslim hatred' — and its appointment of a new 'tsar' to punish people who fall foul of it.

This amounts to a Muslim blasphemy law via the back door. The definition is vague and subjective, and will be weaponised to silence legitimate criticism and debate about Islam, Muslims, and Islamic practices and history.

The FSU’s General Secretary, Lord Young of Acton, said: “This is the most serious threat to free speech the Government has come up with so far — the only area in which it’s achieving any success.

“If we don’t win this fight, tens of thousands of people a year could lose their jobs at the say-so of a Labour-appointed ‘tsar’. It’s dystopian.”

Public bodies will adopt this definition — despite it being non-statutory — with the same zeal the police have shown in investigating and recording non-crime hate incidents (NCHIs). It is predicted by one of the drafters of the definition that it could lead to around 20,000 reports of 'anti-Muslim hostility' a year. At present, the number of recorded anti-Muslim hate crimes is around 4,000.

In a free society, no religion should be shielded from legitimate criticism. This proposal places one faith above the rest.

The Free Speech Union is bringing a legal challenge on two grounds.

First, the definition relies on nebulous, legally undefined terms such as “negative and prejudicial stereotyping of Muslims”, making it incoherent and irrational — and ripe for weaponisation.

Second, adopting such a definition cuts across legislation already enacted by Parliament and therefore breaches the public law principle known as “occupying the field”. Under this established public law doctrine, new regulations, put in place by ministers, must not replace existing legislation. It is constitutionally unlawful. In this case, the body responsible for protecting Muslims from discrimination is the Equality and Human Rights Commission, not an anti-Muslim hostility 'tsar'.

Parliament voted to abolish blasphemy laws 18 years ago. We can't let this Government resurrect them via the back door.

This is one of the biggest battles the Free Speech Union has ever taken on in its six years — and we need your help. Judicial reviews are expensive, but this is a fight we felt we had to take on.

Donate to our crowdfunder below👇

[David Collier @mishtal]

Let me get this straight:

Hindus attacked by Islamists in Wembley

Jews murdered by Islamists in Manchester

And our government has spent the last two years drafting a definition of “anti-Muslim hostility” that limits our ability to confront it.

[Dan Hall @ReverendNerd]

That defending is horrible

[Football on TNT Sports @footballontnt]

A brilliant assist from Courtois is finished off by Valverde to give Real Madrid the lead against Manchester City 💥

@tntsports & @discoveryplusUK