@xoeeie It’s amazing how narcissistic women are anymore. Somehow still you fail to grasp that man don’t want tenderness, or emotional availability just respect and recognition. Which is precisely what you women have vilified with your BS girl power, I need no man movement.
@PatsyDiabetes So your saying women should not be held responsible. The logical conclusion to this is women should then not be responsible. When we shift back to an actual patriarchy, remember. You forced the hand. Mark my words.
@CandaceGuardian@RealCandaceO Her own statement was she was not going to every study the recent filing because her word “Andrew seems like the guy that would last minute cram” if she did in fact do this, then she was either projecting and lying or just lying.
This woman is a LIAR who has hijacked this.
@farar808@PBDsPodcast Maybe she should have had this debate when she wasn’t pregnant. She was clearly very emotionally riled and win or lose Andrew had to deal with a ton of rage baiting comment, which I thinkneveryonenis overlooking as her strategy to rile Andrew up. Which he is prone to do.
@PBDsPodcast After watching that debate I genuinely this Candace is part of the cabal or is being manipulated by her sources to OJ this case into Tyler getting off.
@paleochristcon For anyone who can understand a coherent thread within a debate you won that. Your position doesn’t require you to prosecute Tyler, the fact you tolerated that stereotypical female narcissism is commendable.
@Timcast I’ve said this ad nauseam and people can’t grasp the fact that Andrew was debating on 1 and 2 Candice was 3. Andrew doesn’t need to state any evidence, because her position is not defendable. My position is 2. There are inconsistencies and questions, but the leap to 3 is absurd.
@Parrhesiastes76@thevivafrei@RealAlexJones She has no proof or evidence, just information from sources undisclosed and inferences. Thats not proof. Thats Andrew’s point.
@MarioNawfal He didn’t need too, SHE the one who is making radical claims needs to substantiate them. As Andrew stated, you can think that a case is poor or needs more evidence. But if you are going to state radical claims without verifiable evidence you need to substantiate the claim.
@haymes_joshua@SodomBrimstone The issue everyone who is in Candice’s camp on this fail to recognize that Andrew is debating the position of those who staunchly believe the state evidence and the ones who have questions and concerns but don’t want to follow every thread that she is presenting.