David

Patience - the capacity to accept or tolerate delay, problems, or suffering without becoming annoyed or anxious.

[David @Rhyddid28]

Truly chilling if true....

[Jon Nettlefold @jonnettlefold]

@Ella32823623

[Konstantin Kisin @KonstantinKisin]

It genuinely amused me that people think replacing Starmer will make things better.

From Boris Johnson's election onwards, we've been shuffling the bollards on the Titanic.

You have to actually change direction if you want to avoid crashing into the iceberg:

- End Net Zero
- Make business viable again
- Get welfare under control
- Fund defence
- Ensure equality under the law
- Arrest criminals and keep them in jail
- Deport illegal immigrants and close the border
- Bring the civil service to heel

Burnham will become as unpopular as Starmer within months since he isn't going to do any of that.

[David Shaw @David90shaw]

🚨 THE SINKING SHIP THEY ARE BEGGING YOU TO JOIN.

Good morning again. Look at what Starmer is trying to force us to join. 🤡

The liberal media is desperately gaslighting you into believing the European Union is a booming, stable utopia.

The actual, verified data exposes a completely different reality.

Europe’s share of the global economy has collapsed from 33% to less than 23% in just two decades.

Over 55% of European manufacturing is currently facing total ruin from foreign competition. 💷

While the Westminster elite smear everyday Brits as extremists, Germany is literally veering into political anarchy, with nationalist parties polling at 30% and calling for the mass deportation of 5 million citizens.

Britain stands as a stable, independent nation, yet Keir Starmer and his pro-EU cabinet are still desperate to crawl back to Brussels and pay billions to join a failing system.

They want to chain our country to a burning building just to satisfy their own globalist obsessions.

RT if you stand with the 17.4 million and demand we stay completely OUT! 🔁🇬🇧🔥

[Richard Heart @RichardHeartWin]

Everyone in the UK is being banned from social media unless they DOX themselves and beg for access. You shall not browse anonymously. The vast majority of the people harmed by this are those over 16, for they will spend all their time complying their rights away.

How ironic is it that the under 16's whos freedom of association with each other is being violated wouldn't even be able to see this public press release the UK primer minister released on, you guessed it, social media...

The government says it will go "further than a blanket ban on social media" by blocking "harmful functions such as livestreaming and stranger communication with children for under-16s".

"These restrictions – which together with the ban go further than any other country – will apply to a wider range of online services, including on gaming sites," it says.

"Restrictions on these functionalities will also be on by default for under 16 and 17-year-olds to prevent a cliff-edge at 16. The government will also be looking in more detail at overnight curfews and breaks in infinite scrolling for under-18-year-olds and will set out more detail in July."

"This would capture user-to-user platforms, whose purpose is to enable social interaction and which allow users to post material, alongside algorithms. The ban will therefore include platforms like Snapchat, TikTok, YouTube, Instagram, Facebook and X."

"We have agency", Starmer said, adding that the government "can" and "will" change things.

"Yes it's hard" to legislate for, regulate and enforce but that's why the government "listened to people" and learned from countries like Australia, he says, where a similar ban has already been introduced.

"We're not just bringing forward a ban" but "going further" with "world-leading action" on gaming services and live streaming platforms, Starmer said.

https://t.co/AhLrK4RZhc tech can relieve some of this suck using zk proofs, but man, I don't think people understand what no internet for you without Doxing yourself on every single website looks like. You guys all know the data you give is going to be stolen by hackers on some portion of the regulated sites right?

[Chris Wick @ChrisWickNews]

They told you the planet is dying… and you’re the problem.

Your food.
Your habits.
Your existence.

Meanwhile, behind closed doors, something else is growing.

AI data centres in the UK alone could pump out 123 million tonnes of carbon emissions — the equivalent of millions of human lives over a decade.

But where’s the outrage?

Instead, they blame cows… tax farmers… and squeeze the people who actually feed you.

While tech giants expand quietly… signing deals… building systems that never sleep… and never get questioned.

Different rules.
Different targets.
Same script.

So let me ask you…

Why are everyday people being punished…
while the biggest emitters keep getting rewarded?
Is this really about saving the planet…
or controlling who pays the price?
Drop your thoughts below — I want to hear what you think.

And if this made you stop and think for even a second… share it.

More people need to see this.

[@ChatsWithEm @chatswithem]

Why is Mad Miliband seemingly allowed to destroy this nation???

Signing a legally binding target of cutting co2 again ... and by a whopping 87% by 2040?!!!

Miliband is a dangerous ideological extremist

Our co2 levels are relatively, some of the lowest in the world!

Co2 is GOOD and already at near historic lows!!

Co2 is only 0.04% of the atmosphere

And nature is responsible for 97% , so man only 3%

Ànd the U.K. 1% of that

So the Gov is destroying the UK for 1% of3% of 0.04%

Ergo

0.04% = 0.0004
3% of 0.04% → 0.03 × 0.0004 = 0.000012
1% of that → 0.01 × 0.000012 = 0.00000012

✅ Final answer:
Decimal form: 0.00000012
Percentage form: 0.000012%

Plus we are at near record lows of co2 , and Plants die at 200PPM. They need 1200PPM to grow optimally (3x atmosphere CO2).

And Miliband wants to destroy the U.K. for THIS

Snd those that chastise the gas of life are the same people who think spraying sulphur en masse and aluminium into our skies in order to block the sun is a good idea

The damage this ideology has caused to Britain already is war like.

NOBODY ELSE IS FOLLOWING SUCH INSANITY

To me Netzero is a tool of our enemies to destroy countries like the U.K. and it just needs trecherous fools to carry out the strategy in the name of "doing good"

The people of Britain do NOT consent to this destructive madness!!
#StopNetzeroNOW

[yourfriendSOMMI ❤️💛💚💙 @yourfriendSOMMI]

❤️💛💚💙

🚨 BREAKING 🚨

Altcoins have Officially CONFIRMED their Bottom.

🥳 The 5-Year Altcoin Bear Market is Officially OVER.

OTHERS-BTC ratio has completed it's 12-month structure.

✅ OTHERS-BTC is rising up on Monthly MACD.
✅ PMI is above 50, and also confirms the Bottom

Congratulations. We made it, fam!
We're missing teeth, aged 30 years and our souls were butchered... but we finally made it.

[TR @Tony_Royle]

I don't want Bovaer in my milk.
I don't want folic acid in my flour.
I don't want fluorine in my drinking water.
I don't want palm oil in my chocolate.
I don't want margarine in my cakes.
I don't want my fruit and veg sprayed with glyphosate.
I don't want my apples coated with Apeel.
I don't want my fish and chips cooked in veg oil.
I don't want crappy processed mayo on my burger.
I don't want roast spuds out of a freezer.
I don't want non-grass-fed beef.
I don't want farmed salmon.
I don't want GMO garbage.

... so I don't consume any of these products.

How sad we allow clowns to fcuk around with our food and drink in this way though. 🤦‍♂️

[Pete Sanford @PeteSanford]

ARLA WON -- YOU LOST - BOVAER SOON ALL MILK

After the Arla - DMK takeover last week a Huge New Milk Supply Monolith has been Formed.

This means Bovaer‑milk will quietly become the default “standard milk”, while organic milk becomes scarcer and more expensive.

AND YOU WILL NOT BE INFORMED ON LABELS

Why this matters now with the Arla–DMK merger:

This is where things get strategically interesting.

1. Arla is already the most aggressive adopter of Bovaer

They defended it publicly, continued trials, and positioned it as central to their climate strategy.

This means the merged entity is WILL scale Bovaer faster, not slower.

2. DMK brings Germany — a huge dairy market — into the equation

The merger forces a harmonised methane strategy, and Bovaer is the only ready‑to‑deploy tool.

CONSUMERS: Exoect Organic Milk to be Priced out of the Market, not just UK, not just EU, but there will be plans through those financially involved, like Bill Gates, to get BOVAER in Animal Feeds as the de facto position.

And before Mr Gates Operatives on X start to argue:

The Company holding Bovaer Trademarks is DSM-Firmenich -- The Gates Foundation holds extensive shareholdings in this Company.

From Scottish Parliamentary Briefing Papers re Nicola Sturgeon's involvement...

"There also seems to be some information hidden from public view, such as DSM-Firmenich denying any connection with Bill Gates, only for us to discover Bill Gates has purchased 1m shares in the Company, with the major investor behind the scheme, Black Rock"

There will also be price differentiation between Bovaer Milk and Non-Bovaer.

OF COURSE TEN YEARS FROM NOW THERE WILL BE ZERO CHOICE - JUST BOVAER.

For the Arla–DMK giant, this means:

They will push Bovaer harder than ever — because climate targets demand it.

They must avoid another consumer revolt — because the merged brand is too big to hide.

They will likely invest heavily in “green dairy” PR, transparency dashboards, and retailer‑aligned messaging.

Any future health concerns (even unfounded ones) will hit twice as hard because of their scale.

LACK OF CHOICE, LACK OF TRANSPARENCY, PUBLIC REJECTION

We’re sleepwalking into a food system where the public has no real choice at all.

Supermarkets are quietly shifting to “low‑methane milk” using feed additives like Bovaer — and most people don’t even know it’s happening.

There’s no clear labelling.
There’s no public documentation.

There’s no way for families to choose milk without these additives unless they pay organic prices or hunt down tiny local suppliers.

And here’s the truth nobody in the industry wants to say out loud:

Even if every analysis says “no harm”, even if regulators approve it, even if the science is solid…

The public still won’t want it if they feel tricked.

People want transparency.

People want choice.

People want to know what’s going into the food chain — not find out years later through a press release.

This isn’t anti‑science. This isn’t anti‑farmer.

This is about trust.

If the industry keeps rolling out feed additives without open discussion, clear labelling, or public consent, they’re going to trigger a backlash far bigger than they expect.

Choice matters. Transparency matters. Trust matters.

And right now, the public is getting none of them.

MANY FARMERS DO NOT WANT CHEMICALS OF ANY KIND PUT INTO ANIMAN FEED AND THEN INTO THE HUMAN FOOD CHAIN..

Because. It. Is. Insane...

[FinancialFreedom @FinFreedom414]

The log-log chart on Bitcoin doesn't lie.

It's been right for 16 years. R² = 0.961. That means 96.1% of Bitcoin's entire price history is explained by a single mathematical curve.

Here's what it says happens next — with probabilities. 🧵

[✸GIGA✸ @GigaTheMinter]

I am reaching out to @MetaMask or @Rabby_io to plead for support of Pulsechain

We have an enormous, extremely social and tightknit community but we lack one thing.. a wallet that supports transaction simulation

This one insufficiency is the reason why there has been nearly $1 million stolen from this community in the past 2 months alone

The community would be extremely grateful and I genuinely believe you'd see a really great benefit for giving the support

[Sama Hoole @SamaHoole]

The year is 1950. Your doctor lights a cigarette and tells you smoking is fine. He read it in a study. He is telling the truth about having read it. He does not know, or is not saying, that the study was funded by the tobacco industry.

The year is 1958. Your doctor tells you to eat less fat. The evidence is contested. The contestation is not in the public messaging. The food industry has been helpful in clarifying which findings deserve attention. Some researchers who published contradictory data have been quietly defunded. Ancel Keys is on the cover of Time magazine.

The year is 1962. Your doctor prescribes thalidomide to your pregnant wife for morning sickness. It has been approved. The FDA gave it the green light in Europe. Twelve thousand children will be born with severe limb malformations before anyone in an official capacity acknowledges the problem. The families are told the drug was safe. The drug was approved. Both of these things remain true.

The year is 1972. Your doctor prescribes Valium. Britain is in the grip of a benzodiazepine wave that will last two decades. The dependency risk is known internally. It is not shared. Your doctor is not lying to you. He was not told either.

The year is 1999. Your doctor prescribes Vioxx for your arthritis. It is newer than ibuprofen, well-tolerated, and Merck has a study showing it works. Merck also has internal data suggesting it roughly doubles the risk of heart attack. This data will not reach your doctor for four more years. Fifty thousand people are estimated to have died in the interim. Merck eventually settles for 4.85 billion dollars. No criminal charges are brought.

The year is 2002. Your doctor prescribes OxyContin. Purdue Pharma trained its sales representatives to tell doctors the addiction risk was less than one percent. That figure came from a letter, not a study. The letter was about patients with terminal cancer on short-term doses in hospital settings. Your doctor is a GP with a patient who has a bad back. Nobody draws a distinction. Nobody is required to.

The year is 2008. Your doctor checks your cholesterol. Your LDL is elevated. You are prescribed a statin. Nobody mentions that the number needed to treat for primary prevention is approximately 250. Nobody mentions that the muscle deterioration you'll notice over the next two years is listed as a rare side effect rather than a documented pattern affecting a meaningful percentage of patients. The trial that informed the prescription was funded by the manufacturer.

Now it is today.

Your doctor has new guidelines. New studies. New consensus.

He is confident.

He has always been confident.

The confidence has never been the problem.

The confidence is, in fact, precisely the problem.

[M.A. Rothman @MichaelARothman]

𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐁𝐄𝐒𝐓 𝐁𝐑𝐄𝐀𝐊𝐃𝐎𝐖𝐍 𝐎𝐅 𝐂𝐀𝐏𝐈𝐓𝐀𝐋𝐈𝐒𝐌 𝐕𝐒. 𝐒𝐎𝐂𝐈𝐀𝐋𝐈𝐒𝐌 𝐕𝐒. 𝐂𝐎𝐌𝐌𝐔𝐍𝐈𝐒𝐌 𝐘𝐎𝐔’𝐋𝐋 𝐄𝐕𝐄𝐑 𝐇𝐄𝐀𝐑

This creator explained the difference using YouTube—and it’s brilliant.

𝐂𝐚𝐩𝐢𝐭𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐬𝐦: “𝘠𝘰𝘶 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘳𝘵 𝘢 𝘠𝘰𝘶𝘛𝘶𝘣𝘦 𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘯𝘦𝘭. 𝘠𝘰𝘶 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘦 𝘶𝘱 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘢, 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘧𝘪𝘭𝘮, 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘦𝘥𝘪𝘵, 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘣𝘶𝘪𝘭𝘥 𝘢𝘯 𝘢𝘶𝘥𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦. 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘱𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘮 𝘥𝘰𝘦𝘴𝘯’𝘵 𝘨𝘶𝘢𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘦 𝘴𝘶𝘤𝘤𝘦𝘴𝘴. 𝘠𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘦𝘧𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘵 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘮𝘢𝘳𝘬𝘦𝘵 𝘥𝘦𝘤𝘪𝘥𝘦.”

𝐒𝐨𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐬𝐦: “𝘠𝘰𝘶 𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘺𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘯𝘦𝘭, 𝘣𝘶𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘨𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘯𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘱𝘴 𝘪𝘯 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘴𝘢𝘺𝘴, 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘮𝘢𝘥𝘦 𝘵𝘰𝘰 𝘮𝘶𝘤𝘩 𝘮𝘰𝘯𝘦𝘺. 𝘞𝘦’𝘳𝘦 𝘨𝘰𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘰 𝘳𝘦𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘪𝘣𝘶𝘵𝘦 𝘴𝘰𝘮𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘺𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘳𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘯𝘶𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘯𝘦𝘭𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘥𝘪𝘥𝘯’𝘵 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘮 𝘢𝘴 𝘸𝘦𝘭𝘭 𝘢𝘴 𝘺𝘰𝘶. 𝘠𝘰𝘶 𝘵𝘦𝘤𝘩𝘯𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘰𝘸𝘯 𝘺𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘣𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘥, 𝘣𝘶𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘰𝘭𝘴 𝘩𝘰𝘸 𝘮𝘶𝘤𝘩 𝘰𝘧 𝘺𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘴𝘶𝘤𝘤𝘦𝘴𝘴 𝘺𝘰𝘶’𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘰𝘸𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘰 𝘬𝘦𝘦𝘱.”

𝐂𝐨𝐦𝐦𝐮𝐧𝐢𝐬𝐦: “𝘛𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘯𝘰 𝘱𝘳𝘪𝘷𝘢𝘵𝘦 𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘯𝘦𝘭𝘴. 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘦 𝘰𝘸𝘯𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘱𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘮. 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘦 𝘢𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘨𝘯𝘴 𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘺𝘰𝘶’𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘰𝘸𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘰 𝘤𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘵𝘦. 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘦 𝘥𝘦𝘤𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘴 𝘩𝘰𝘸 𝘮𝘶𝘤𝘩 𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘤𝘩 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘨𝘦𝘵.”

Then the key insight: “𝘌𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘮𝘪𝘴𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘳𝘦𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘪𝘣𝘶𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘴 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘤𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘻𝘦𝘥 𝘱𝘰𝘸𝘦𝘳. 𝘈𝘯𝘥 𝘤𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘻𝘦𝘥 𝘱𝘰𝘸𝘦𝘳 𝘯𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳 𝘴𝘩𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘬𝘴. 𝘐𝘵 𝘢𝘭𝘸𝘢𝘺𝘴 𝘨𝘳𝘰𝘸𝘴.”

He nailed how they sell it: “𝘐𝘵’𝘴 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘨𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘯𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘰𝘭—𝘪𝘵’𝘴 ’𝘦𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘰𝘮𝘪𝘤 𝘫𝘶𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘦.’ 𝘐𝘵’𝘴 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘳𝘦𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘪𝘣𝘶𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯—𝘪𝘵’𝘴 ’𝘱𝘢𝘺 𝘺𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘧𝘢𝘪𝘳 𝘴𝘩𝘢𝘳𝘦.’ 𝘐𝘧 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘲𝘶𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘪𝘵, 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘮𝘶𝘴𝘵 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘤𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘣𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘱𝘰𝘰𝘳.” A 2024 poll found 𝟒𝟒% 𝐨𝐟 𝐆𝐞𝐧 𝐙 viewed socialism favorably—until they were told what it actually means (Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation).

𝐂𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐳𝐞𝐝 𝐩𝐨𝐰𝐞𝐫 𝐧𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐫 𝐬𝐡𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐤𝐬. 𝐓𝐡𝐚𝐭’𝐬 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐚 𝐰𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠. 𝐈𝐭’𝐬 𝐚 𝐠𝐮𝐚𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐞.

[ClarksonsFarm @ClarksonsFarm1]

Repost!🤝

[Bernie @Artemisfornow]

🚨 Britain is becoming a communist failed project in real time.

[Liz Truss @trussliz]

This shows how much Brits have been lied to. Time to wake up.

[Electroverse @Electroversenet]

The BBC says it will "review" its climate coverage. Not because it suddenly found integrity, but because it got caught.

A leaked letter from a former standards advisor accused executives of ignoring "widespread evidence of skewed reporting."

The BBC has skewed the truth for years to push a political agenda. It claimed human CO2 made US heat waves "35 times more likely," it said wildfires were exploding because of climate change, and it sold Net Zero as an economic miracle while hiding the costs.

These are all falsehoods. The data, in many cases, show the exact opposite. And when challenged, the BBC quietly edited, deleted or buried the evidence.

Even the regulator Ofcom ordered entire climate programs be pulled for dishonesty.

This isn't journalism, it's propaganda. But the public is cottoning on and switching off. In the past two years alone, roughly a million UK households have stopped paying the BBC license fee.

[Mikey 🇮🇱🇬🇧 @MikeyPhil64]

Could everyone please repost and share this tweet. I don’t normally ask, but this corner of Norfolk is going to be covered by solar panels and infrastructure the equivalent of 43,200 tennis courts. This insanity must be stopped. Thank you
https://t.co/3ny8od1F9l
@AllisonPearson @TiceRichard @KayMasonBillig

[Rupert Lowe MP @RupertLowe10]

Inflation isn’t some random phenomenon that just happens to a country. Political choices have made life so much more expensive for British families, and political choices can make life so much more affordable for British families.

When the state grows too large, it spends beyond its means. That spending has to be funded. Through higher taxes, more borrowing, or printing money. Those are their options.

All three drive inflation. All three make your food shop more expensive, your pint more expensive, your tank of fuel more expensive.

High taxes make it more expensive to produce, hire, and invest - so businesses pass those costs on. Prices rise. Inflation soars. It’s a vicious cycle.

And so many of those taxes are done through stealth.

We all pay SO much tax but we have no idea because it’s hidden from us. That money is stolen from the people, and they don’t even know it.

Frozen thresholds. Stealth taxes. State theft. I detest it.

Of course, excessive and reckless state spending pumps more money into the system, so prices rise - the cycle continues.

And when governments print money and inject it into the economy, what happens to the value of the existing money? What happens to your savings? Your wages? It all becomes worth less and less.

This is not complicated - a bloated state makes a country more expensive. It makes Britain more expensive. It makes your life more expensive.

So the reverse is also true.

Cut the size of the state, and you reduce wasteful spending.

Cut taxes, and you lower the cost of production.

Restore proper discipline, and you stabilise the value of money.

A Restore Britain Government would not manage inflation, we would tackle the root causes of it.

We would not engage in unnecessary foreign wars that hike the price of oil, punishing British families at the pump and everywhere else. When fuel gets more expensive, everything follows.

Britain needs cheap fuel, cheap energy. That means drilling, drilling and drilling some more. Domestic energy production is vital. Cheap energy makes everything more affordable.

Everything.

The drive for Net Zero must end - Restore Britain will halt that mad march to further bankruptcy .

A country that lives within its means is a country people can actually afford to live in.

And yes, that will mean many cuts, and many difficult decisions.

But the hour is late, and nothing else will suffice.

Any political party saying otherwise is lying to you. There are no easy fixes. That time is over.

Restore Britain’s approach will be painful in the short term, but it will bring the cost of living down.

It will make life more affordable for hardworking British families.