Ribdro

[Ribdro @Ribdr0]

@LPTravisTX @RepThomasMassie It seems to be a constitutional requirement, but maybe I'm missing something.

U.S. Const. Art I, §7, cl. 2

[Ribdro @Ribdr0]

@RepThomasMassie @justinamash Are laws passed via voice vote even law?

U.S. Const. Art. I, §7, cl. 2?

[Ribdro @Ribdr0]

@jeremyrhammond FDR was truly an authoritarian fascist. It's fitting he's a hero to the left.

Nearly the entirety of unconstitutional govt can trace back to FDR and his ever more captured SCOTUS.

[Ribdro @Ribdr0]

@NickKristof @elonmusk Sad stories don't change government authority.

There is no constitutional authority for the federal government to be providing any funding to any other country for any reason whatsoever.

[Ribdro @Ribdr0]

@sues86453 @GovRonDeSantis @Walmart Because the govt has no say in the matter.

Complain to Walmart.

Don't be an authoritarian fuck and try to use govt power to control others.

[Ribdro @Ribdr0]

@Kronykal It doesn't prevent Congress from making a law altering the rules, either.

[Ribdro @Ribdr0]

@arabbitorduck @BarbMcQuade There constitution is clear about where executive power is vested.

An independent executive branch agency is impossible as all executive power is on loan from the singular executive.

[Ribdro @Ribdr0]

@KeyserSozeThree @BarbMcQuade @rdone No, it won't.
The Constitution is clear: all executive power is vested in a singular president.

There is no such thing as an independent executive agency as all executive power is on loan from the singular executive.

[Ribdro @Ribdr0]

@BarbMcQuade There is no such thing as an independent agency.

Congress violates separation of powers when it creates an agency with the power of the executive that is shielded from the executive.

All executive power is vested in a single president. Executive agency power is on loan.

[Ribdro @Ribdr0]

@mprice14 @ReformedWriter @memeticsisyphus No.

[Ribdro @Ribdr0]

@ghenniss @ryanscottborman @constans Politicians talk about minimum wage in the mindset of large cities with a high cost of living. Setting a one size fits all from that mindset destroys small business in rural communities with far lower cost of living.

You want govt to involve itself in private transactions.

[Ribdro @Ribdr0]

@ghenniss @ryanscottborman @constans Why is it any is the govt business, especially the federal govt, what someone is willing to offer for work and what someone is willing to accept?

The real minimum wage is $0. If you aren't worth minimum wage and can't even choose to accept less, you get $0.

[Ribdro @Ribdr0]

@ShawnMount3 @SouthPawLogix @Wyorifleman @NewsWire_US @grok I would add/argue States that are too dysfunctional to agree on someone who would vote for the State's interests should work on their internal issues before having representatives in the senate and in regards to that specific aspect it is a feature, not a bug.

[Ribdro @Ribdr0]

@ShamashAran I have no issue with them applying, as long as they are not fast tracked and the criteria according to statute is strictly followed.

Applying for does not mean granted.

[Ribdro @Ribdr0]

@dilanesper And to be clear, I think government banning smoking against the owners express will is also invalid

[Ribdro @Ribdr0]

@dilanesper I think the motive makes it extra offensive.

I'm trying to think of anything else that the govt preemptively bans on private property, open to the public, unless granted explicit permission.

The only thing close is smoking, but those bans can't be bypassed with permission.

[Ribdro @Ribdr0]

@HumanProbably2 @nettermike The fuss your taking about is that the federal government has no constitutional authority to implement a wealth or unrealized gain tax.

While there may be 9A or even 5A ramifications for property tax, the lack of US constitution authority is not a relevant factor at that level.

[Ribdro @Ribdr0]

@JohnCornyn Get to work and do your job, old man.

[Ribdro @Ribdr0]

@NBinted @CharlieAdorer @AaronHorrocks Look at you trying to be an edgelord.