Over the weekend a client was falsely arrested by the Houston Police Department for the crime of interfering with his own false arrest. A child had called police to report an argument between my client and his fiance. When police arrived, the woman appeared at the door. Officers wrote that they saw no visible injuries on her and that she told them it had just been a heated argument.
Police literally pushed her out of the way and entered the home without a warrant. They initially had two guns drawn but later had a gun and a taser. The woman pleaded with police that the client was not a “suspect” as they called him that. They pointed their weapons at him and ordered him to show his hands. They put their hands on him to arrest him and threw him to the ground, busting his face. They lied in their report and claimed he had “closed the distance” on them and tried to run through the apartment. He was injured in the incident.
The DAs Office refused charges on family violence (duh) but charged the client with “interference.” He did not interfere, and at any rate, you can’t interfere illegally with a false arrest.
We appeared in front of the judge where I asked for the court to find no probable cause. The court set it for a hearing the next day to give the state a chance to review the video. We showed up in court today and the judge was out, and another judge refused to hold our hearing, leaving my client in jail. I explained that he was going to lose his job and we worked very hard to get him that job (in food service).
The DAs Office continues to engage in pretend prosecutions on cases they KNOW they will never take to trial. They are using human beings as target practice for young lawyers who have no idea and no training.
My client cannot make a $500 bond and I was told today that bond was reasonable so I am doing the only thing I can do when two arms of the same government refuses to fix an obvious miscarriage of justice. He will not sleep another night in jail on my watch for this bullshit.
@ScottKacsmar If you don't mind, just out of curiosity, where would you approximately have Larry Bird all-time? Not coming to argue or anything, but I know he either gets overrated or underrated and figured I'd ask.
Imagine deleting something made by, and then lying directly to, your own friends. Only because you're so afraid of all the dumb shit you said yourself.
It wasn't his to delete. Dankula and Bearing made it with him. Now who the fuck will ever work with him? Dented troglodyte
@ChibiReviews This is actually a complete lie. Without doxing her, we are less than 2 years apart, and remained friends until my early 20s.
Sorry bro, you don't have shit. This drama is literally older than I was when it happened.
You're still a pedophile.
This woman was called Astrielle in the animal crush community and was being watched by the guys on the Kiwi Farms for years before her indictment.
They've been around since the Kero the Wolf drama and I think they've gotten a dozen people arrested now. Very proud of them.
Except that's not true. You're referring to posts 15 years old about things already years old at the time. When I was ~18, I was accused of talking to someone who was ~16 when I was also ~16. People then say it was 19/15 to be uncharitable.
But you are a pedophile, bottom text
Sure thing. When I was a teenager I spoke with, and was attracted to, teenagers. This was documented on an Internet forum 15 to 18 years ago. Now that I am 33 I talk to, and am attracted to, adults.
You are older than me today but are attracted to children. See the difference?
@FakeTaxedBrass Chibi Reviews appears to be upset over posts made on a site that is not the Kiwi Farms, or rather people's reactions to that post on the Kiwi Farms.
More info about Chibi Reviews on the Kiwi Farms.
https://t.co/5MpepMcmXU
Kiwi Farms is an open platform, like X, where @FakeTaxedBrass posted the joke about digging up Chibi Review's brother's grave.
Chibi takes a very controversial stance that erotic drawings of child or child-like characters is acceptable. If people bully him that's not our fault.
@jondelarroz I'm sorry but if you cancel a YouTube channel and deprive a family of seven income you deserve worse than the worst I can do.
The censors should be afraid to censor
The Quartering has flagged the Kino Casino Clip channel under the guise of “ban evasion” when nobody including the owner of the channel is ban evading. @TeamYouTube this is an attack on us and a false flag on our channel. Everyone @ team YouTube to help spread this message.
It's like you're taking all lessons learned watching Internet personalities implode and then re-enacting them.
You've crafted this message to "own up" without actually having to tell your audience what you did and to who.
For educational purposes, let's go point-by-point:
1. Who is this for? Who are "some folks"? It should be for @PoweroftheTruth and @Andywarski, but you don't mention them once. The first requirement of an apology is addressing the people who you have wronged. People are taught this as toddlers.
2. The second component of an apology is identifying what you are apologizing for. You actually didn't just say you'd "take their channel down", you were threatening to go "scorched earth" and "take everything they have".
3. The third component is actually taking responsibility for it unconditionally. The first NINE paragraphs preceding the apology is your justification. If you feel so justified in going "scorched earth" and "taking everything they have", don't bother apologizing.
4. You're doing this on Twitter. Your tweets only get as many views as mine and all I do is dump half-baked racism a couple times a week. Supposedly you get as many as 60,000 live viewers, so that would be the appropriate place to apologize for threatening to engage in lawfare and deplatforming for online banter.
5. The true purpose of this message is to try and appease PPP + the Kino Casino audience without actually having to expose your audience to anything that's been going on or what any of the "vile untrue shit" is. In the same way you thought threatening to take everything they had might make them shut up, you're hoping that an ambiguous apology might take the wind out of their sails without having to eat crow for anything.
Finally, and most importantly, this message ignores reality. You're not learning anything. You've not accepted any of the points raised that have "triggered" you.
Your friend, who you invite over to your house, is a known swinger with a criminal history involving domestic violence. There is very good circumstantial evidence that you were aware of this.
There are way too many clips of you making wildly inappropriate statements to your female cohosts. Nobody can take public statements that they're fine with it at face value. They are your employees, and one of them is feeding a baby (soon two). She can't afford to leave at any time if she wanted to.
You also say "my female co-workers love working together and we're all friends" but we know for a fact that's not true. Former co-host and co-founder of The Publica, Sydney Watson, is evidently very unhappy, probably because of the on-screen sexual harassment she was subjected to. Despite your claims, she does appear to be subject to an NDA (or maybe a non-disparagement clause, which is not technically an NDA).
This post does three things: (1) it admits that PPP is getting to you, (2) you have learned nothing, and (3) you will keep causing the same problems for yourself.
P.S. Rekieta also does the ":)" cope-smiley thing.