0xRekt

[0xRekt @Rich0nly]

@cryptofergani Me

[0xRekt @Rich0nly]

@iansgft imagine releasing the goat via social media… L for FAS..

[0xRekt @Rich0nly]

@its_JpsDMK @Pokkiri_Victor ipdi solli solliye dhanda adi vangitu irukinga agmark muttals…lost in kolathur, cpi exited, 6 decades alliance IUML exited… edhu ellam nadakathunu nenaichingalo, adhu ellam onnu onna nadanthutu iruku…

[0xRekt @Rich0nly]

@dagalti all good but this time its different. There have already been plenty of unexpected surprises… right from MKS losing his own constituency, to the CPI exiting, and even the IUML ending its six-decade alliance with the DMK…so I wouldn’t write anything off just yet lol

[QuStream @qu_stream]

Some of the most important work in quantum-proof security isn’t public yet.

Our CEO, Adrian Neal, presenting at Nokia’s Swiss Innovation Day today.

The pieces are coming together.

[Okara @askOkara]

Today we're introducing the world's first AI CMO.

Enter your website and it deploys a team of agents to help you get traffic and users.

Try it now at https://t.co/KbAE6FNgzE

[ZERO IKA 🗡️ @IamZeroIka]

Must watch.

[QuStream @qu_stream]

https://t.co/Esiv60dDHx

[Adrian Neal @AdrianGNeal]

Anything that we are planning to deploy, and the security claims for that particular deployment, would be a matter for the client and ourselves. Only when the client is satisfied with our offering, after completing their own due diligence process, would a deployment commence. These are going to be commercially confidential, so are not public.

If you are unhappy with the general claims made, you need not participate in the project any further, but since you do not have any knowledge of the products being offered to potential clients (because that is confidential), any claim you make that we in some way are misrepresenting our offering, is unproven at best, and defamatory at worst.

Our product offering is derived from the research that we have published - the core research has been academically peer reviewed and published by Springer, so I do not know how much more transparent we could have been.

We offer our research as an open book - if you understand what we are offering, come talk to us, if not, no worries.

We make no claim that you can not judge for yourself - if you think our claim is wrong, that is you right, however, other, exceptionally intelligent people (in my opinion), including a few professors, do not share your view, and have validated, yet further, our claims.

My suspicion is that you have some particular motive that we do not see, that appears to be driving your outburst, but you're not the first, and you won't be the last.

Very shortly, we will be going public with a combined commercial offering with a number multi-nationals - I can promise you, they know exactly what they are doing - they have done' their homework - and they have chosen to embrace Q-Stream - one of them may even acquire the exclusive IP rights to the protocol...... then you will need to be very careful about what you say going forward - as they may not be as amused about your comments as I am.

So, for now, lets leave it here; I will not waste any more of time on this nonsense - I have given you a fair and just reply to your false accusations.

[0xRekt @Rich0nly]

@frankdegods @ZssBecker The solution is already here @qu_stream and it is matter of time. 🤝

[Pickle Cat @0xPickleCati]

https://t.co/2ghAA5aLZB

[0xRekt @Rich0nly]

@crypto_wallet4 That’s a wise choice bruv! Lezzgo!

[Mayukh @mayukh_panja]

I read this so that you don’t have to.

It is a bunch of meta analytical BS and vague philosophizing without any actual actionable advice.
Here is a sample sentence from the article:

“You aren’t where you want to be because you’re afraid to be there”.

Basically Paolo Coelho-esque self help crap. Read this if you want to procrastinate but want to convince yourself that you are being productive.

Here is how you actually fix your life:
Get up every morning and do like three tasks. Push yourself to do those three tasks, no matter how badly you do them. They can be anything. Send the email. Apply for the job. Write the essay..

That’s it. Just keep doing shit. Instead of reading BS self help advice that only helps the author get elonbucks.

[DAN KOE @thedankoe]

https://t.co/7l7Jef99QZ

[0xRekt @Rich0nly]

@solana Just QuStream and the OG Adrian Neal! $QST

[Ching Chong @Ching280761805]

🧵The lack of awareness and how DUMB CT truly is will never cease to amaze anyone with a functioning brain cell or two. The fact majority of CT is unaware of Qustream is actually incredible. There is 0 (and most likely will never be) anything remotely close to what is being done. Pretty much all focus is in currently building academic/corporate foundations, which most that are focused on small caps can either not understand, have dopaminergic issues, or believe it’s too good to be true.

I fiercely believe it’s a combination of all three, though slightly more weight to the first and last.

(Before diving deep, The Layer2 devnet is up and running, Layer1 expected ~2 mo: https://t.co/R0KxgpjXqU)

Not much is really needed to stress the importance of the work:
Qustream is quantum-proof, EVERYTHING else is merely quantum-resistant.

The current weakness in PQC is the over reliance on post quantum signatures like Dilithium, Falcon or XMSS (used in $ALGO and $QRL for example) which rely on computational assumptions (lattice or hash hardness) that will inevitably weaken with future breakthroughs.

Where the genius takes place is looking back at one of the most straight forward key distribution algorithms (the One-Time Pad) and solving its weaknesses never thought fixable:

Make it blazingly fast and practical (0.9 cycles/byte + drop-in integration, the best alternative, AES at peak efficiency is 50x slower)
Add authentication / ownership proof without a separate signature algorithm
Guarantee zero key reuse (automatic fresh key every single time)
Eliminate the “key must be as long as the message” problem (on-demand extraction)
Deliver true, scalable randomness (real quantum-noise entropy, not pseudo-RNG)
Solve secure key distribution at the internet/blockchain scale (AKA the Last Mile Problem, no full key ever sent over any channel. Traditional QKD = secure until the last mile → then vulnerable. QuStream = no mile is ever trusted because although complete keys travel everywhere, they are hidden and one time use only.

If you follow the rules perfectly, no computer classical or quantum, can ever crack it, even with infinite time. This IS a not 1, not 10 but a 100 billion dollar project (couple nation state banks and telco companies implementing Qustream or something ladadaa)

$ZEC $RNDR $ETH $STRK $CKB $QRL $QANX $QNT $KTA $ABEL $SOL $POPCAT $HEHE

[0xRekt @Rich0nly]

@Sam21Degen @coinbureau Yes, probably u should check out what @qu_stream is doing, their PoC with NATO. They ain’t building just a quantum proof chain, but more of an encryption as a service aka perfect secrecy that is chain agnostic.

[0xRekt @Rich0nly]

Day 71 of posting the @qu_stream logo until $QST hits $1

[0xRekt @Rich0nly]

Day 70 of posting the @qu_stream logo until $QST hits $1