RUGBY LOVING EX PLAYER. PARENT TO A SURVIVOR OF CSA. ACTIVELY SEEKING OUT/EXPOSING GROOMING GANG MEMBERS AND CHILD ABUSERS - ALL CHILD ABUSERS SHOULD HANG
I wrote to Keir Starmer warning him not to appoint Matthew Doyle to the Lords due to his connection with a convicted paedophile.
He ignored those warnings.
And it now turns out he had even higher hopes for Doyle.
Just extraordinary.
REVEALED: Keir Starmer wanted to appoint Matthew Doyle, the friend of another paedophile, to a top ambassadorial role.
And he ordered it be kept SECRET from the Foreign Secretary.
This is another disgusting insult to the victims of sex offenders.
Starmer must go.
🚨UK DISGRACE‼️
Islamist terrorist Shah Rahman who plotted to bomb the London Stock Exchange - is ALLOWED to stay in Britain.
@ValentinaForUSA - who dares criticise Islam in our Christian country - is BANNED by the Home Office!
Who would you rather see in the UK?
A convicted Al-Qaeda plotter…or a woman speaking truth?
This is absolutely disgusting. Britain has lost the plot.
Keir Starmer said the people attacking the Jewish community will face "the full force of the law".
One of the arsonists pleaded guilty today.
So they sent him home.
Hey @Keir_Starmer
If that is the "full force of the law" what would leniency look like?
Asking for a friend.
Here's an old ITV News report about how Margaret Hodge ignored reports of child sexual abuse when she was leader of Islington Council.
But despite this, Tony Blair made her Children's Minister.
It’s always jobs for their mates, no matter how dodgy they are. Nothing changes.
EXCLUSIVE: SHABANA’S SHAME – THE FIRST-GEN HOME SECRETARY OVERRULING OUR JUDGES!
By Stan Robinson – Voice of Wales
In a chilling display of "two-tier" arrogance, Home Secretary (and practising Muslim) Shabana Mahmood has officially gone rogue.
Just weeks after a High Court judge humiliated the Ministry of Justice by clearing a man for burning a Qur'an, this first-generation Pakistani Home Secretary has decided she is above the law of England and Wales.
JUDGES SNUBBED, EXTREMISM EMBRACED
We saw it with our own eyes: the High Court ruled that in Britain, you have the right to offend. They threw out the "vexatious" prosecution of Hamit Coskun but the Ministry of Justice, affirming that burning the Qur'an is NOT a crime.
But Mahmood—whose only real "legal" experience, (akin to Rachel Reeves Financial experiences), seems to be playing politics—has decided to overrule the wig and gavel.
By banning Valentina Gomez for the exact same act, she isn't just ignoring a judge; she’s shredding the very fabric of British free speech to protect her own "brethren" from being offended.
WHERE IS THE JUSTICE FOR OUR WHITE CHRISTIAN GIRLS?
While she’s busy acting as a self-appointed gatekeeper of what we can and cannot burn, the blood of our daughters is still crying out for justice. For decades, thousands of white British girls were fed to the wolves by mainly Pakistani male rape gangs while the authorities,Labour, families, mullahs, and mosque elders looked the other way to protect "Muslim community relations."
Now, Mahmood offers us a "failing inquiry" that smells like a cover-up. Reports are already circulating of evidence being shredded and vital files being "lost." Why is it so easy for her to ban a woman at the border, but so "complex" to put a rapist behind bars, deport them, or stop the tsunami on the South Coast?
A DANGEROUS DOUBLE STANDARD
In Birmingham, we have "visiting" clerics teaching the "correct" way to stone a woman to death. They walk our streets, they preach in mosques, and they receive government grants. Yet Churches and Jewish property can BURN, and a woman who says "hurry words" is treated like a national security threat.
Mahmood’s priorities are clear:
Protect the feelings and actions of her own demonic community.
IGNORE the victims of industrial-scale rape mainly by her bretheren.
OVERRULE the British judges who dare to defend free speech.
THE VOICE OF THE PEOPLE
Britain is waking up to the reality of an infiltrated Home Office that serves its own AND Foreign interests instead of the BRITISH public good.
We don’t need a Home Secretary who acts like a religious ISIS censor; we need one who will fight for the victims of INDUSTRIAL SCALE RAPE gangs, whether they are Hindu or Christian, and respect the rulings of our courts—not some 5th-century Sharia cabal.
Mahmood, you can ban speakers, but you cannot silence the truth. The people of Wales and the rest of the UK see exactly who you are, what you are, and whose side you are on—and it isn't ours.
This is Sean Egan. He joined Morrisons at the age of 17.
After 29 years of dedication at supermarket chain, he was dismissed for confronting a shoplifter, which led to a scuffle with thief who spat at him.
A shameful decision by @Morrisons.
He should be thanked, not sacked.
They think we are stupid. The Iran war will become the excuse for every failed Labour policy so let’s just fix Rachel’s post from this morning. War is NOT responsible for …
▪️Employer National Insurance increases raising hiring costs
▪️Frozen tax thresholds dragging more people into higher tax bands
▪️Minimum wage rises increasing business operating costs
▪️Higher public sector pay settlements adding fiscal pressure
▪️Regulatory and net zero compliance costs passed into bills
▪️Business costs feeding through into higher consumer prices
▪️”Stealth tax” effect from inflation + frozen allowances
▪️Increased borrowing pushing up long-term tax risk
She could easily bring prices down and has chosen not to 🤡
I still can't get my head around this. We currently have a prime minister, in office, who has
Broken the ministerial code
Repeatedly lied to the public
Repeatedly lied to parliament
And put our national security at risk.
He should be dragged out of No.10 in cuffs
GET HIM OUT!
Morgan McSweeney telling Sir Philip Barton, the former top civil servant at the Foreign Office, to bypass security for Mandelson’s appointment:
“Just F…ing approve it”
Anyone still believe McSweeney had his phone stolen?
12 police turned up to Mr Smith's house at 2345 to arrest him for a blog post. He was arrested and taken to the police station locked up for a crime of posting a blog.
Unluckily for Herts Police, ,(who have form) this man studied law so he took them to court and won £34,000.
An Islamist terrorist has been allowed to STAY in the UK despite his asylum claim turned down.
An immigration judge has ruled that sending him back to his own country would “breach his human rights”
Shah Rahman tried to set bombs off in London and has been linked to Al Qaeda.
He is now a free man with a full benefits package.
The Man Nobody Is Talking About. His Name Is Sir Philip Barton.
Buried inside Tuesday's committee testimony, beneath the headlines about constant pressure, bullying and secret job searches, is the detail that may prove the most consequential of this entire affair. It concerns not Olly Robbins, not Morgan McSweeney, not even Keir Starmer. It concerns the man who was there before all of them. The man who said no. The man who then left his post eight months early.
Sir Philip Barton was the Permanent Under-Secretary at the Foreign Office when Peter Mandelson's appointment was announced in December 2024. He was, in other words, the most senior civil servant in the building at the precise moment the machinery of state was being directed to place a man with documented links to Russia and China into the most sensitive diplomatic posting in the Western alliance.
What Robbins told the committee on Tuesday is this. Barton pushed back. When the Cabinet Office argued that vetting Mandelson was unnecessary, that a peer and Privy Councillor did not require developed vetting, Barton refused to accept it. He insisted that vetting was a requirement. He had to be, in Robbins's own words, very firm in person. He also voiced reservations about the appointment to Jonathan Powell, the National Security Adviser, reservations that were noted and not acted upon. He was worried, Robbins suggested, about exactly the same reputational risks that had been detailed to the Prime Minister before the appointment was announced.
Then Sir Philip Barton left his post. Eight months before his tenure would otherwise have concluded.
The question Richard Foord put to Robbins on Tuesday was the right one. Why did Barton's tenure end early? Robbins said he did not know. He suggested ministers may have felt it was time for a change. That answer is not an answer. It is the absence of one.
Consider what the timeline now shows. A senior civil servant pushes back against the appointment, insists on vetting when the Cabinet Office wants to bypass it, raises reservations with the National Security Adviser, and departs eight months ahead of schedule. His replacement arrives to find the appointment already treated as a fait accompli, the vetting process under constant pressure from Downing Street, and the question of outcome entirely subordinate to the question of speed.
If Barton was removed because he stood in the way of this appointment, then Robbins was not the first civil servant sacrificed to protect it. He was the second. And the question of who else was moved aside, overruled or silenced in the months between December 2024 and the moment the security services finally said no, becomes the most important question this affair has yet produced.
Starmer sacked Robbins for following the rules. The Foreign Affairs Committee will now call Barton to give evidence. What he says will either confirm what the timeline already suggests or provide an alternative explanation that the evidence does not currently support.
There is a pattern here that goes beyond process failure. Process failures are random. They point in different directions. What this affair has produced is a series of events that point consistently in one direction. Officials who comply are retained. Officials who push back depart. The security services are bypassed. The vetting is treated as an administrative inconvenience. And the one question nobody at the top of this government will answer is why this appointment, this man, this post, mattered so much that every obstacle was removed to make it happen.
Barton apparently asked that question. He left eight months early. The country deserves to know why.
Wow. I thought 10 minutes would be a lengthy watch. How thoroughly entertaining. This is a career ending interview for @TomHayesBmouth. He was utterly juvenile & bitchy. Typical Labour.
Hey @susannareid100
If you’re going mention Matt Hancock’s affair & state “social distancing can’t possibly be followed during an affair” please address the fact that Angela Rayner did the same when she began an affair with her married “campaign manager” in full lock down.
Five men and one woman are on trial at Caernarfon Crown Court accused of running a child sexual exploitation gang in Rhyl, Denbighshire.
Mustafa Iqbal, 43, is alleged to be the main abuser who groomed and exploited three teenage girls aged 14 to 16 between 2022 and 2023.
He faces multiple charges including rape, trafficking for sexual exploitation, and supplying drugs (cannabis and cocaine) in exchange for sex.
Also on trial are Ziaullah Badshah, 25, Mohamed Usman Arshad, 36, Jaswinder Singh, 61, and Sarah Gray, 53.
They deny a total of 28 charges, which include rape, sexual assault, supplying drugs to children, and arranging or facilitating child prostitution.
The trial is expected to last six to eight weeks.
🚨Urgent Update🚨
Not related to Wethersfield but a HMO and a serious alleged sexual assault.
I’ve just seen this video on X that allegedly 2 girls have been sexually assaulted over a 4 hour period in Braintree and Essex police are covering this up as they do not want protests and riots.
We need urgent information on this.
If this is found to be true we will be calling a protest on Saturday to get answers and we need all protest group to unite and come together.
Is this not enough now ?
Credit @ACSPARTAN1
4 February:
“Did the official security vetting that he received mention Mendelson's ongoing relationship with Jeffrey Epstein?”
Starmer: “Yes, it did"
Today:
Starmer: “I had not seen the security vetting file.”