“Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered.... Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Party is always right."
~George Orwell, 1984
Another serious problem with Calvinism is that it functionally undermines assurance of salvation.
Calvinism teaches that Christ died only for the elect and that only the elect receive genuine saving faith. But election is God’s hidden decree. So how does a Calvinist know that he is actually among the elect?
He cannot simply point to his present faith, because Calvinism also recognizes people who appear to believe, display spiritual fruit, and profess Christ for years—only to fall away and thereby be declared never truly regenerated. Present faith is therefore treated as genuine only if future perseverance eventually validates it.
The Calvinist is pushed inward, constantly examining the quality of his faith, the sufficiency of his fruit, and the durability of his perseverance for evidence that he may be elect. But if apparent faith can later prove false, how can he possess settled assurance now? His confidence becomes dependent upon correctly interpreting his own spiritual condition rather than resting upon the objective promise of Christ.
Biblical assurance does not require us to deduce whether we were included in a secret decree. It rests upon God’s revealed promise: “Whoever believes in the Son has eternal life” (John 3:36), and “I write these things to you who believe…that you may know that you have eternal life” (1 John 5:13).
The believer’s assurance is not: “I hope my faith and perseverance eventually prove that I was secretly elected.”
It is: “Christ died for sinners, God promises eternal life to everyone who believes, and I am trusting in Christ.”
Fruit confirms faith; it is not the foundation of assurance. The foundation is Christ’s finished work and God’s promise to the believer.
I've had a change of heart on federal income tax. On the surface, it's just a way for the government to generate revenue—it has to get its funding from somewhere. But I now see that the method of taxation itself fundamentally alters the relationship between the government and its people.
When the government relies on taxing individual income, it shifts from serving its citizens to exploiting them as a revenue source. This dynamic creates an inherent friction, where the government no longer answers to the people but to the system that extracts from them. And if you look around, it's clear—whatever our tax dollars are funding, it’s not serving us.
This is what modern economists fail to grasp when they dismiss tariffs, sales taxes, or luxury taxes as harmful. The structure of taxation matters, not just the amount collected. The income tax distorts governance itself—and it needs to go.
@brockpierson I definitely used one of those in high school. I was an Explorer using one of the largest main frames around. The facility was called TIPO.
@DrMichaelLBrown The two have become one, so there is one entity now where formerly there was two.
“…by your blood you ransomed people for God from every tribe and language and people and nation, and you have made them a kingdom and priests to our God, and they shall reign on the earth.”
@wholemars She's the safest person on the road TBH. An AI4 Tesla would have avoided every single accident I have ever been involved with and that is with no assistance from me.
@5Solas God, repeatedly tests, his servants throughout scripture, if God knew everything about the future these tests would have no meaning. God gives us a free will, and he intervenes in the future to make his word come to pass.