Rick Rangel

[Rick Rangel @RickRanRound]

@RichardHanania So he "affirmed" this person's feelings by not saying anything about what he did or didn't think about them?

[Mankind vs Modern Feminism @MankindVsModFem]

@elonmusk , @nikitabier, if this OG doesn't receive more impressions than the "borrowed snapshots" of his work, we need some platform changes to ensure that content creators receive recognition for their own "Tesla" and "OpenAI" IP - perhaps a new post report of "hijacked content".

This isn't the first time it's happened to @profontheright. It's also happened to many other content creators like @SwipeWright, with his EPIC meme of Progressive evolution. Rob and Colin's growth serve the platform, and their growth combats totalitarianism with intelligence and wit. Both of them should have 10x their engagement.

The hijacking of original content does not serve the platform, or the world writ large. The theft of content - the theft of any content - opposes the stated interests of the platform itself. At least make the hijacker retype the words in their own voice.

This "theft of content" isn't much different, in principle, to socialism and communism - the concept that third parties are entitled to profit from the work of innovators if they have sufficient "social mass" to steal instead of producing. This is antithetical to capitalism and innovation. This is "social communism" - the principle that the collective is entitled to benefit from the work of an individual.

Ultimately, creators will opt for a "Galt's Gulch" where their contribution will be respected, and protected by the community. CREATE THAT SPACE, @elonmusk. Allow content creators to protect their content... or the market will, eventually, provide them with that option and true innovation will "seed" itself elsewhere.

SOMEONE get Musk's attention on this. We need a "hijacked content" post report - only accepted if filed by the OG, perhaps only if the OG is a Premium subscriber and/or the hijacker exceeds a minimum follower count (binary OG complaint with posted OG thread x binary Premium subscription x binary hijacker follower count exceeding "x" followers = accepted report) if the OG isn't tagged or credited. Post the OG thread along with the complaint, and if found "guilty", the hijacker is suspended until they delete the hijacked content or revise the thread with a credit.

Would it predominantly impact large accounts? Yes. But much like in IRL capitalism, large businesses have a responsibility to PURCHASE content from smaller businesses, not crush them by "borrowing" their IP.

Brilliance and innovation MUST BE CULTIVATED by this platform if it's going to continue to be the best hope for combatting totalitarianism. Smaller, brilliant accounts must be allowed to benefit from their IP without larger accounts hijacking social and economic gains.

Repost and tag @elonmusk. I'll never reach him, I'm nobody by design - and will remain nobody by design - but SOMEONE has to get his attention on this. It's just a coding fix, even Grok could parse the initial complaint with image recognition and OCR and weed out mass reports, substantially reducing manipulation for human review - and it would only take a few human reviews and suspensions for larger accounts to "get it" and fall in line because they have substantial social and economic losses to consider when reposting content.

Repost. @elonmusk will Grok it (in the OG Heinlein context), if he "sees" it. Someone help him "see it".

It's time for a report for "hijacked content".

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

Well said

[Rick Rangel @RickRanRound]

@amuse Maybe this will teach people to be less willing to believe stupid shit?

[Riley Gaines @Riley_Gaines_]

But how is she being awarded for something they swore "wasn't happening"

[Rick Rangel @RickRanRound]

@SarahisCensored I have some frozen pizza (from the grocery store) in the freezer right now. Really. They're kind of ok when I don't feel like cooking a proper meal.

What would that be if translated from their code-speak?

[Rick Rangel @RickRanRound]

@ksorbs watch the whole armada go Brave Sir Robin when they see her

[Rick Rangel @RickRanRound]

@TK2082485146097 @TRHLofficial The post in question wasn't threatening them. It was claiming that a politician she likes is a threat to them.

Which is quite plainly not the same thing. Perhaps it's not only the left that pretends to not understand things sometimes?

[Rick Rangel @RickRanRound]

@SydneyLWatson orange man bad
no human is illegal on stolen land
police evolved from slave-catchers
state violence is what the wealthy use for class warfare
all wealth is stolen from the poor
billionaires shouldn't be allowed to exist
capitalism is theft

etc etc etc

[X Freeze @XFreeze]

Wikipedia’s blatant bias against Elon Musk is insane
They frame him like an accomplice, which is flat‑out untrue

On Elon’s page, the Epstein section opens with a loaded line about a “longstanding relationship with convicted child sex trafficker,” using sensational wording about emails showing “persistent interest” in visits/parties despite ZERO evidence Elon ever went to the island, flew on the plane, or attended anything, and despite Elon repeatedly denying and rebuking invites

For Bill Gates, Wikipedia suddenly turns gentle. Epstein is framed as a “financier.” The section opens by emphasizing philanthropy, “Gates Foundation” ties, and Gates’ “huge mistake” and “regret,” with the “friendship” portrayed as unclear and contextualized as business and charity

So you end up with a clear pattern: a harsher, accusatory tone for Elon versus a softer, contextual treatment for Gates - even though Gates actually met Epstein multiple times after his conviction and flew on his jet, while there is no evidence Elon ever went to the island

There is also zero credit given for how Elon publicly pushed for the Epstein files to be released and campaigned for full transparency, even though that’s a major part of the story and a major reason they are public now

Look at the narrative framing:

WIKI: BILL GATES (The Protected)
> Epstein Label: "Financier."
> The Narrative: "Friendship is unclear." Claimed he only visited for "philanthropy" and the "Gates Foundation."
> The Reality: Gates visited Epstein MANY times after his conviction, including private meetings and personal favors
> Wikipedia's Verdict: "Just business."

WIKI: ELON MUSK (The Target)
> Epstein Label: "Convicted Child Sex Trafficker."
> The Narrative: "Longstanding relationship."
> The Reality: The files show Elon REFUSED visits and never went to the island
> Wikipedia's Verdict: "Accomplice."

They want you to believe Gates - who actually met and flew with Epstein - was just doing “charity” on the island, while Elon - who exposed the files - is the villain

Wikipedia is not an encyclopedia, it’s a narrative machine run by clowns pretending to be fact‑checkers

[Rick Rangel @RickRanRound]

@EndWokeness Then please explain what is happening in the blue cities right now.

[Rick Rangel @RickRanRound]

@300mirrors That's not "selective outrage", that "some are more equal than others".

[Kevin Sorbo @ksorbs]

I think I’d call the war off

[Rick Rangel @RickRanRound]

@DisrespectedThe Have you perhaps not heard of the whole "minor-attracted person" thing?

Or the "no human is illegal" and "sex work is work" things?

I'm pretty sure they *already know* and just don't care and don't agree that those are evil.

[Robert Sepehr @robertsepehr]

Helen of Troy is described in classical literature and art as having radiant golden-blonde hair and sparkling blue eyes. She was 12 years old when she was kidnapped by Theseus. On the left is an accurate depiction of what she looked like, on the right is who was cast to play her.

[Stephen Miller @StephenM]

This is the core organizing strategy of the entire Democrat Party. It’s all downstream of this.