Righteous Lion 🦁

I ❤️ good people!

It's all lies, on both sides! 🤫

[Andrew Bridgen @ABridgen]

The Rise of the New World Order and the Culling of Man

[Georg Pazderski @Georg_Pazderski]

Nayib Bukele stellt die berechtigte Frage, wie es möglich sein kann, dass eine nie gewählte Familie Soros in souveränen Ländern Staatsanwaltschaften und Wahlen kontrolliert über sogenannte NGOs.

Bukele hat damit Schluss gemacht.

Höchste Zeit dem Treiben ein Ende zu setzen.

[Vincent Vandeputte @VincentVandep8]

Soms vragen mensen aan Grok om datgene wat ik post, te valideren of te ontkrachten.

Dat gebeurde ook toen ik de feiten deelde over hoe de beruchte –maar in die vorm onbestaande– “97%-consensus” ooit tot stand is gekomen.
Zo gaf bijvoorbeeld slechts ongeveer 0,5% van de onderzochte publicaties expliciet aan dat de menselijke invloed verantwoordelijk was voor meer dan 50% van de opwarming.

➡️ Grok bevestigde dat die 97% consensus niet klopt. Op zich ook niet zo belangrijk want consensus ‘voelt’ als overtuigend heeft weinig of geen bewijswaarde.

➡️ Hier de feiten daarover en hieronder de reactie van Grok:

De “97% van de wetenschappers consensus” claim nog eens uitgelegd.

Van alle 11.944 onderzochte studies die hiervoor werden gebruikt formuleerde slechts 0,3–0,5% expliciet dat de mens meer dan 50% van de recente opwarming veroorzaakt. Minder dan 1% dus…

De toegepaste truc was dat het bekende 97%-cijfer niet werd berekend op alle 11.944 studies, maar binnen een zorgvuldig uitgekozen en gefilterde subgroep van studies die wel een standpunt innamen over menselijke invloed.

Niet 97% van alle studies.
Maar 97% van die geselecteerde subset van studies.

Misschien goed om nog eens die zogenaamde “97%-van-de-wetenschappers-is-het-erover-eens” claim uit te leggen.

Dus: hoe kwam men aan die 97%?

➡️ In twee stappen.

1️⃣ Selectie van studies met een standpunt:

Er werden in totaal 11.944 studies bekeken.

7.930 daarvan namen géén expliciet standpunt in over de oorzaak van de opwarming: bijna twee derde dus. 🧐

Die werden dan niet meegenomen in de berekening van de consensus over menselijke invloed. 🥴

Dat betekent dat het percentage dus niet op het totaal werd berekend, maar op de groep die wél een positie innam. En dat is minstens misleidend te noemen. 🫣

2️⃣ Brede definitie van “instemming”

Van de 4.014 die overbleven zei het grootste deel: “De mens speelt een rol.”

En “speelt een rol” is uiteraard niet hetzelfde als: “is de grootste oorzaak.”🎯

Toch werden alle studies die ‘enige menselijke invloed’ erkenden samen gecategoriseerd als “endorsement”. 🤦‍♂️

In de communicatie werd dat vervolgens omgezet naar:
“97% zegt dat mensen dé oorzaak zijn.”
🙃🙃🙃

Ter info: het ging daarbij om deze cijfers uit Cook et al. (2013):
-64 van 11.944 (0,53%) werden gecodeerd als: mensen veroorzaken >50% van de opwarming.
-41 van 11.944 (0,34%) formuleerden dat expliciet sinds 1950.

Dus:
✅ Slechts 0,3–0,5% van alle onderzochte studies formuleerde expliciet dat de mens meer dan 50% van de recente opwarming veroorzaakt.

Het bekende 97%-cijfer werd berekend binnen de subset van studies die een positie innamen over menselijke invloed, niet op alle 11.944.

En dat is geen rekenfout.
Dat is misleiding, geen wetenschap.

[Ferdinand Meeus @fmeeus1]

Meten is weten. Dat hebben Duitse meteorologen gedaan. De gemeten inkomende zonnestraling aan aarde oppervlak over Duitsland is toegenomen met 10 W/m2, dat is bubbel zoveel als het door IPCC berekende CO2 broeikaseffect .
Mogelijke oorzaken : minder wolken, schonere lucht.
Maar deze info horen we niet in de msm.
Opwarming door meer zon , wie had dat nu kunnen bedenken. 🤣😎

[Righteous Lion 🦁 @RighteousLion17]

@UdoKeten @sekerci__sinan @clashreport I agree...
and NO, a miracle wont come!

Learn from it, so that you'll notice the signs early on and it wont happen globally!

Slowly, gradually our judiciary systems, media, education, politics,...
were BOUGHT and influenced under the guise of 'tolerance and compassion'... ☠️

[Righteous Lion 🦁 @RighteousLion17]

@4nkhx @sekerci__sinan @clashreport They removed a lot of his statues in 2020 under BLM protests
(not a fan of BLM btw, it's a Soros PsyOp)
The one you pictured, gets vandalised almost every other protest!
Confirming my belief,
we are at 'war'
it's rich vs poor!

[Righteous Lion 🦁 @RighteousLion17]

@UdoKeten @sekerci__sinan @clashreport We agree then!
It's a very beautifull gun/gift!
The PM needed a media'stunt'
His party is selling out to the EU,
nothing more!
Chatcontrol, extra taxes, less privacy...
It's all theatre!
Belgium is done! ☠️
And the EU is becoming Orwellian!
Sorry for the misunderstanding.✌🏻

[Righteous Lion 🦁 @RighteousLion17]

@UdoKeten @sekerci__sinan @clashreport Just checked your LinkedIn, Umut...
I'm very impressed! 🧠👌🏻

But disappointed by your comment at the same time...
Read about colonialism and european, institutional monarchies before judging the working class.

My 'excuses', are even supported by wikipedia...

[Righteous Lion 🦁 @RighteousLion17]

@comrade_mog @sekerci__sinan @clashreport You're a troll and/or illiterate...

Facts :
https://t.co/XeGAQ0Ohdl

Thanks for playing... 🤡

[Righteous Lion 🦁 @RighteousLion17]

@4nkhx @sekerci__sinan @clashreport Never!!! ☠️
He's a German from the house 'von Wettin' like most European 'royalty', one BIG family! 👹
The Roman empire placed them on the throne.
They enslaved my ancestors.
I dont accept blame for their historical conquests!
My pure bloodline comes from 'Gallia Belgica'! 🦁

[Kyrylo Shevchenko @KShevchenkoReal]

My name is Kyrylo Shevchenko. I am the former Governor of the National Bank of Ukraine.

A horrifying assassination attempt on a Ukrainian businessman in Monaco has shocked the world. His companion had both legs blown off in the explosion, while he and his son were hospitalized.

But the story has an even darker continuation: the bomb was planted by a Ukrainian woman who was receiving payments from an officer of Ukraine's Main Intelligence Directorate under the Ministry of Defense, known as HUR. Upon her return to Ukraine on July 1, that same officer shot her in the head. The entire case was "investigated" and closed in just a few days.

Watching this unfold like a scene from a mafia thriller, I am reminded of the direct threats I myself have received from Ukrainian security services, including kidnapping warnings. It is becoming clear that Zelensky's regime is prepared to use any means against its opponents.

Behind this system stands not only Zelensky himself, but also the man long known as the "grey cardinal" of his office — Andriy Yermak. Until recently nearly all-powerful, controlling appointments across ministries, security agencies, and the military, Yermak formally resigned in late November 2025 amid the corruption scandal surrounding Energoatom, and later became a suspect in a money-laundering case. But the system he built — as Ukrainian lawmakers themselves have acknowledged — did not disappear along with his departure from office.

This case raises serious questions: How did a woman wanted by Interpol cross into Ukraine without assistance from the security services? And how was such a high-profile investigation completed in a matter of days? For comparison, the legendary Ukrainian journalist Georgiy Gongadze was murdered in 2000, and the investigation still has not named those responsible.

Yet here, the intelligence officer quickly confesses, claims he acted alone, and says his leadership knew nothing.

This is convenient. The main witness and perpetrator is now dead and cannot speak.

I do not own a major, attractive business, but as Governor of the National Bank, I crossed a line: I refused to allow the money printing that would have hurt Ukraine in 2022, and I blocked a sponsorship scheme linked to Zelensky's inner circle. For that, I now face a fabricated criminal case in both Ukraine and Austria.

I am grateful to Austria, where I am currently located, for protecting me from threats by Ukrainian security services.

I appeal to the civilized world and to Europe: by continuing to turn a blind eye to what is happening, you are condemning other Ukrainians to fear, persecution, and — God forbid — elimination at the hands of Zelensky's regime. This regime has already crossed the psychological threshold of murder. This cannot end well — neither for us, nor for you.

[Kevin Bass @kevinnbass]

It's so funny the Europeans will scan your devices for child exploitation material, yet they will cover up and media blackout hundreds of thousands of child rapes because the rapists are immigrants.

EU officials do not care about child exploitation.

They care about power.

[Righteous Lion 🦁 @RighteousLion17]

@karluktu @sekerci__sinan @clashreport I'm just stating facts.
Every global conflict benefits the few...
You're cherry picking the history that benefits you.
I'd rather focus on injustice that still exists today then dwell on the past.
I could've confronted you with Türkish history, but choose not to be divisive.

[Righteous Lion 🦁 @RighteousLion17]

@sekerci__sinan @clashreport King Leopold II of Belgium personally controlled the Congo Free State as his PRIVATE colony (not a Belgian state colony).
French speaking, industrial elites plundered along with him.
The average Belgians only found out about the atrocities decades later.

It's rich vs. poor!!!

[Fidias Panayiotou @Fidias0]

CHAT CONTROL IS COMING

Even though most Members of the European Parliament have voted to REJECT Chat Control, we have not been able to reach the absolute majority that was needed (361 Members).

This is a sad day for Europeans.

[Martin Sonneborn @MartinSonneborn]

Die Chatkontrolle kommt. Kein guter Tag für Freiheit & Bürgerrechte…

[IMPERATOR @IMPERATORAUS]

In his Summa Theologiae, St Thomas Aquinas laid out one of the most charitable yet practical arguments concerning immigration that effectively shaped the West for almost 1,000 years.

1. Immigration must always be proportionate so that foreigners can properly assimilate into the culture and mode of worship of the state.

2. Citizenship – and associated rights – should only ever be granted after the third generation to preserve the culture, mode of worship, and constitution of the state.

3. The common good of the citizens must remain the highest priority of the state, meaning, the state's obligation to provide aid to its neighbours can never be at the expense of the citizens.

However, Aquinas ends with the sobering reminder that some peoples and states are incompatible with one another, and these must be held as "foes in perpetuity".

[Jokke_vlo @Jokke_vlo]

Wanneer je meer dan 50% procent overheidsbeslag hebt, wanneer je kliklijnen hebt, chatcontrol, moneycontrol, meer dan de helft van je bevolking voor de staat werkt, in elke straat camera’s hebt, exit taks, enz enz ben je een communistische staat. Zowat elke niet Europeaan ziet dat en kan je dat vertellen.

[Righteous Lion 🦁 @RighteousLion17]

@AmsterdamXXXjax @PGoldschmeding Alle begrip, Luke!
Onze mentale weerbaarheid wordt zwaar op de proef gesteld!
Niet enkel op X, maar ook de echte wereld, zit in bewust gecreëerde chaos
Om gek van te worden!
Crisis na crisis
Ordo ab chao 🔥
Verlies onze gezamelijke vijanden niet uit het oog & zoek verbinding! 🤝🏼