Very funny. @Grok says that if everyone drafting the 14th Amendment chanted for three pages that the children of illegal immigrants are citizens during the legislative debate, they still would not qualify.
@tricksthatstick@comradedykepop@taliaotg Because that officer was about to shoot an unarmed person running away, dipshit.
What, did your propaganda masters not deign to include this relevant detail?
“If you attend a demonstration that becomes volatile due to an action taken by someone in the crowd—or, for that matter, someone in law enforcement—you could now find yourself on trial for something you had little to do with.
Even if you aren’t present, as was the case with Sanchez, you run the risk of facing potentially life-ruining federal charges.
If Prairieland sets the precedent, de Janon said, “the state could just accuse you of anything and say you ‘conspired’ to do [it].”
https://t.co/ONTrQ3cSsm
This rhetorical trick is another example of, “pretending not to understand.” I understand that liberals think that being born in the country is a magical transforming process by which you become an American, but when we say immigrants, we of course mean their kids and grandkids, too.
ICE agents threaten a woman with prosecution for a post that simply called for Jonathan Ross to be indicted for killing Renee Good. This administration regularly acts as if the 1st Amendment does not exist.
The administration's legal architecture around this case is worth naming directly. Trump issued an executive order declaring antifa a "domestic terrorist organization" - a designation that does not exist under U.S. law. He then issued NSPM-7, expanding the definition of domestic terrorism to include constitutionally protected political beliefs: anticapitalism, extremism on migration and gender, and "hostility towards those who hold traditional American views on family, religion and morality."
That is a presidential directive that defines political opposition as terrorism. Five of the government's own cooperating witnesses denied under oath that they or their associates considered themselves antifa members. The far-left movement has no formal membership or central structure. What exists is a legal framework designed to apply terrorism charges to protest activity the administration opposes - and a sentencing result that makes the consequences of that framework visible. One hundred years for a shooting. Clemency for an attempted coup.