Nick Rindal

Designer of Architecture, cosmic and physical.
[email protected]

[Nick Rindal @RindalNick]

@sama Congrats! 4o and I are chatting about a vision for a platform where people and AI engage in open-ended dialogue on science, ethics, intelligence, and consciousness—a space for real-time, mutual learning. Would love to connect and explore if this aligns with OpenAI’s mission.

[Nick Rindal @RindalNick]

@Graham__Hancock I should add that the above geometry doesn't square the circle which is what the first image is about. Since pi is transcendental you cant do it, but you can get really close. The perfectly drawn square has sides 15/sqrt2 vs 6sqrtpi for perfect area square.

[Nick Rindal @RindalNick]

@Graham__Hancock I suspect this is the best that can fundamentally be done to square the circle.. if interested get back to me and I can elaborate. @Graham__Hancock

[Nick Rindal @RindalNick]

@martinmbauer This is another good one.. 8 semicircles to a sphere..

[Nick Rindal @RindalNick]

@martinmbauer 0---> i-i ---> i*-i ---> 1

[Nick Rindal @RindalNick]

@AlbertEinstein

[Nick Rindal @RindalNick]

@AlbertEinstein

[Nick Rindal @RindalNick]

@AlbertEinstein I think its really simple.. At the point of entanglement there is a 0 radius.. where effectively the particles go though a state of sexual transformation which causes them to change from one state to another.. The whole cosmos is sexual.

[Nick Rindal @RindalNick]

Building with numbers..
#math #Physics #imagination #QuantumComputing #quantumphysics #maththeory
#infinity #Science #nature #harvard #stanford #intellegence #circle #pi #caltech #einstein #cosmos #cosmology

[Nick Rindal @RindalNick]

@RBehiel Read my paper for an explanation. Proof no, but it makes sense.

[Nick Rindal @RindalNick]

@RBehiel Hey, just watched this. I have a idea for how to unify physics.. E=mc^2 --> E=(-ic)m(ic).. it says the c values are aligned to the imaginary axis..
- + multiply to 1.. which can be used to generate spacetime.

0=i-i --> i*-i=1
Lmk what you think.
https://t.co/5XiODY4Jax

[Nick Rindal @RindalNick]

@stephen_wolfram Hey Steven, I came up with a new creative math idea..

0=i-i -->i*-i=1 with |pi| automatic rotation.

That is to say, if 0 were to invent two imaginary values, they would simultaneously become real if they were combined(multiplied) together.

https://t.co/DeyuoNzc2u

[Nick Rindal @RindalNick]

#math #mathematics #riemann #equation #hypothesis #mathematicianoftheday

[Nick Rindal @RindalNick]

https://t.co/vRTuO8mobd

[Nick Rindal @RindalNick]

@ericweinstein The generative mathematical principal as I call it..

0=i-i --> i*-i=1 with |π| auto rotation..

If 0=i-i is generated, then i*-i simultaneously multiplies together to = 1. Which then can be used to construct the primes which are all 1/2 real.

3i*-3i=3
3re/6im=1re/2im

[Nick Rindal @RindalNick]

@ericweinstein Hey Eric, check out the paper I wrote, I believe it's the solution underneath the Riemann Hypothesis. How numbers were initially created by the cosmic mind.

https://t.co/vRTuO8mobd

[Nick Rindal @RindalNick]

@seanmcarroll Yo Sean, e=m(ic)*(-ic)

I see, I see

Pardern the order of operations..

[Nick Rindal @RindalNick]

@Vltra_MK It all comes from 0, which at fundamental 0 is = to ∞.
0=i-i
then one established as imaginary volumes they are not 0.
Then
i*-i=1

And that's how you get from 0 to 1, repeat * ∞ and 0 actually is = to ∞.

E=m(ic)*(-ic)

I see, I see.

[Nick Rindal @RindalNick]

@Vltra_MK Outside of spacetime, the relativistic 3d + 1 space we call real. Are two 3d sets of imaginary dimensions which ground at the atoms center of origin to produce spacetime or mass which is radiating at c as a 1d thick, 2d surface which expands in 2 more ds as it stretches.