@mmapropsguy@FarazJaka Impossible to know since it’s unknowable which of the three dealer motions contained two cards. The order they came out face-up means absolutely nothing.
@RealEggy2023@FarazJaka Problem is it’s unknowable which of the three motions from the dealer contained two cards. Impossible to correct with certainty. That’s why the TDA corrective procedure is written the way it is.
@tucsontwitchy@GTO_Diaper@WSOP Someone gets it! Everybody on here so certain they know which cards should have been the flop are forgetting that it’s unknowable which motion contained the double feed. TDA is pretty smart here.
@Asce0fSpadez@GTO_Diaper@WSOP How can you “tell”? This would require knowing with absolute certainty which of the three face-down card motions the dealer did contained the double feed. The order they slid out face-up has no bearing on their order. Their original order is unknowable.
@PlzzaPlzza1001@GTO_Diaper@WSOP How could anyone possibly know the original order of the cards? When the three motions to form the flop went face down, it’s impossible to know which feed contained two cards. That’s why the TDA corrective procedure is written as such. The true order of the cards is unknowable.
@mattbrinda@GTO_Diaper@WSOP Problem is that you don’t know which of the three “feeds” contained two cards, so the original order cannot be known for certain. That’s why the TDA corrective procedure for this situation is written how it is. There is no way to definitely reconstruct the order of the cards.