When 'Person of Interest' started airing more than a decade ago, most people watched it as entertainment.
A machine that could see patterns in human behavior. A machine that could predict violence. A machine that could watch everyone, understand everyone, and quietly shape outcomes.
For the average viewer, it was fiction, but for the open minded, it was a warning. Because the real mistake ordinary people keep making is assuming the technology they can access is anywhere close to the technology that exists behind closed doors. It isn't.
People look at public artificial intelligence and think they are seeing the frontier. Instead, they are seeing the showroom, the polished and 'safe' version. They are seeing the version released only after it is old enough, limited enough, and harmless enough to be placed in public hands.
What you have access to is the equivalent of being handed a weak machine and being told you are touching the future. Meanwhile, somewhere far above the public layer, the real systems are being fed with oceans of data, state resources, intelligence access, behavioral modeling, market flows, satellite feeds, biometric signals, and computational power the average person cannot even picture properly. And you, the people, are funding it's growth every time you get wrecked in the markets.
That is the part most people still fail to grasp. The richest people on Earth do not live in the same present as you. The most powerful governments do not operate with the same tools you see. They do not wait for the future. They acquire it early, hide it, weaponize it, and build empires with the advantage gap. That is how power has always worked, and that's why you always feel 3 steps behind the brightest minds, always finding excuses for why you're in the situation you're in while seeing others a lot wealthier and seemingly happier. You're not the problem, you're just not given the best tools in order to progress.
The ultra-wealthy do not need to know everything. They only need to know more than everyone else, earlier than everyone else, and with better tools than everyone else. That alone is enough to turn information into domination.
Enough to front-run markets, influence narratives, shape political moods, enough to predict behavior before people themselves understand what they are about to do. That is why the real divide in this world is no longer just money, but access.
Access to data.
Access to computation.
Access to predictive systems.
Access to tools that do not merely analyze reality, but increasingly model it, steer it, and exploit it.
So when people ask what kind of AI the biggest whales, billionaires, intelligence networks, and state actors might have access to, they are usually asking the wrong question.
The better question is: How wide is the gap between what is public and what is private? Because history suggests that gap is never small.
And if fiction was already showing the public a machine like that more than ten years ago, imagine what existed then, and then imagine what exists now.
The truth is simple: The masses are usually introduced to technology only after power has already extracted years of advantage from it.
That is the pattern, the game. And that is why people who think public tools are the ceiling are looking at the shadows on the wall and calling them reality.
The most dangerous machine is never the one they show you. It is the one they don't.
I love the cadence of this chart
Bitcoin % of Supply in Profit/Loss
As I said previously, you start looking for major market cycle bottoms *after* they cross, not before.
They just crossed.
Such a great chart for keeping people on the right side of the market in midterm years
Once you hit about a 20-point IQ gap, communication starts to completely break down.
It's not that the lower IQ person is "stupid" (although that can often be the case) or the higher one is arrogant, it's that you're literally operating on different systems.
A 20 point difference (roughly 1.3 standard deviations) means:
Vocabulary and abstraction levels diverge sharply. What feels like crystal clear logic to one side sounds like vague, pretentious word salad to the other. Jokes land flat. Metaphors get taken literally. Complex cause and effect chains get simplified into "this good, that bad."
Different time horizons and pattern recognition. One person thinks in months or years and sees systems, the other is locked into days or immediate rewards. Trying to explain second order effects feels like speaking another language.
Also, processing speed and working memory gaps. The higher IQ person is already three steps ahead, getting impatient. The lower IQ person feels talked down to or overwhelmed.
Both walk away frustrated.
Both have wasted each others time.
🚨 Anthropic just showed a 24-minute workshop on how to actually do prompts for Claude.
Taught by the people who built it.
Free. No registration. No paywall.
I've seen $300 courses that don't cover what they teach in the first 8 minutes.
Watch it and bookmark it now.
My 3.5-hour conversation with @naval.
Fresh takes on every idea from The Almanack of Naval: happiness, judgment, knowledge, leverage.
Now in one episode, available on Spotify, Youtube, etc.
@thedefiedge@grok Wenn man mit Automomatisierungsprozessen arbeitet und diese für Kunden erstellt. Ist es Pflicht von Make, VoiceAI wegzugehen und sich eher mit openclaw zu befassen? Oder ist das ein eigenes Ding?
5. Startup roadmap from idea to $10k revenue
"Be my startup mentor. I have this idea: {idea}. Help me refine it, validate the market, uncover monetization options, and outline a roadmap from MVP to first $10k in revenue."