@Obolatcan24 When usage is higher than the points, it simply indicates he is an inefficient player, as the team can not score over 100 points per game when he runs the offense.
@CW_STREAMS_@collinsworth55 Let Luka go is a smart business decision. No owner would like to pay him over 70M per year without winning a chip. Luka has been exploring the system to win the game of numbers, but not a chip.
@1280Josh@collinsworth55 Different styles. Brunson is better in 4-th quarter, Luka shines in first half. Brunson plays team game while Luka focuses on his own numbers. Agree Luka is not a chip material.
@FredJoel99@lalakersuk@EricPincus Luka 50M, AR 40M, Bron 30M. Looks a nice deal for Lakers until they realize the third option is the most reliable player.
@lalakersuk@EricPincus AR deserves 35m salary, but his style is too similar to Luka, strong offense and weak defense. Not reliable against strong defense. Thus not a good idea to build a strong team around them.
@quis_alexi15970@teddy_Dwyane@LakeShowCP He had Brunson and kyrie next to him, both are excellent PGs too. Both Brunson and Kyrie are more reliable than Luka in 4th quarter.
@M0NIGLE@StockSavvyShay there are two systems in U.S., minimal taxes for the rich elites and the bottom class. The federal can squeeze only the middle class. The issue is how long the government can keep doing this as it is clearly not sustainable.
@MagicJohnson Wemby>>SGA>>Luka. Lakers failed to find a competitive core to replace LeBron. Not a surprise given the poor management over years.