Peter Murrell: pleads guilty to embezzlement, gets legal aid & the opportunity to pay his loot back.
Alex Salmond: found innocent, paid his own fees, died near impoverished.
This is why we *cannot* let this go. The soul of our nation is at stake. They *must not win.*
2/
I now believe Peter Murrell was allowed to become the useful container for a much bigger scandal.
One man. One plea. One neat little box.
How convenient.
The trouble is that the stench does not fit inside the box.
3/
I now believe the plea deal was designed to prevent sunlight.
A full trial would have asked the questions the SNP, the Crown Office and half of Edinburgh’s political class plainly do not want asked.
Who knew? Who benefited? Who covered? Who lied?
1/
🧵Things I now believe to be true.
Scotland has not just watched a party finance scandal. It has watched the state, the party machine and the prosecution system close ranks in real time.
The public were expected to notice nothing.
Unfortunately for them, we did.
The people that donated to the ring fenced fund were donating to a indyref campaign that might end in Scottish independence
They were not donating to election campaigns to see more SNP grifters board the gravy bus
The donations were not used for the purpose they were given.
@WingsScotland So people who commit financial crime get legal aid because their assets are frozen.
But when someone is falsely accused ie Alex Salmond they have to pay their own defence in this case costing 350k, which they never get returned
Does not seem fair
Liberation Scotland Update June 2026 #1
from C-24 in Managua, Nicaragua
"Scotland actually has three separate claims to the right of self-determination. And bear in mind, the right of self-determination is only the right to decide. It doesn't mean you're automatically independent, it means you have a right to decide your own future without being contested.
"So the first right of determination consists in the fact that multiple prime ministers, and officials of the British state, have categorically, including Keir Starmer back in 2020, have categorically said that the Scots have a right to decide to go it alone; that they have a right to independence if they want.
"In international law, because the Brits don't have a written constitution, this becomes a constitutional principle, if it has been said long enough and often enough by representatives of the state. Prime Minister speaks on behalf of the state, of course. Like Supreme Court speaks on behalf of the state, they're considered to be state organs.
"So now in international law, Scotland has been established as having that right. When David Cameron agreed to an 'opinion poll' that was called a referendum, he agreed in principle to put a mechanism in place to allow that right. He didn't follow up, he didn't allow the international standards. Nonetheless, that precedent was there. So that's one.
"Number two, the British state claims that it's founded on the Treaty and Act of Union, that's its authority. It said that most recently in its submission to a parliamentary report, published in February this year. The constitutional foundation that means its authority is the Treaty and Act of Union. Well, the Treaty Act of Union, have something called a 'condition precedent'.
"Basically means the union is conditional. What's the condition? It's a hoary old, absolutely irrelevant Act 1706 of the Presbyterian Faith, Preservation of Presbyterian Faith, which lifts the Claim of Right as part what has to be ratified along with the articles of the Union.
"Claim of Right gives the people of Scotland, unequivocally, the right to remove a government that no longer serves the interests of people. Very specific about the violations that caused the government to cease to be legitimate and stop them.
"But it very clearly shows that the sovereignty of the nation of Scotland lies with the Scots, and cannot possibly lie with Westminster. So either, and that condition is there, Claim of Right is still there and we still have that right, or there's no union. There's no British state, because precedent comes before, underpins native conditions. Without it, there's no union. With it, we have the right to leave. That's international law, that's treaty law.
"And finally, the right of self-determination for a people who have been made a dependency, that's a colony, by a larger state is absolutely entrenched. It's a fundamental principle of international law.
"Does that apply to Scotland? Absolutely. The British State has said, Scotland is not a dependency, that's a colony, because we have a partnership with the UK, it's a voluntary partnership. We've all heard that. Voluntary partnership requires an agreement. The agreement is the Treaty and Act Union.
"And hey, guess what? This underpinning authority of the British state has never been given effect. We don't have a treaty, and because we don't have a treaty, in other words, we don't have a partnership agreement, we are not a partner. We can only be a dependency. And that means that under International law, Treaty Law, Scotland has a right to decolonize.
"Not secession, not to fight for a remedy to the way the British state has treated us, a fundamental right to decolonization. And that's what we're doing in Nicaragua, because the vast majority of the international community does not know that Scotland is a dependency.
"It has no idea that the United Kingdom is a fraud. It has no idea that Scotland is not part of a unitary state. Once that has been clearly established, everything changes, the whole game changes.
"So everything hangs, basically, on the ability of British state to hood-wink the international community. And Liberation Scotland is here making sure they can't succeed any longer. And then having that formally recognized, that Scotland has this right to self-determination.
"Once that happens, that doesn't make us independent overnight. What it does do, it clears the path. No more Section 30, no more Westminster permission, no more Westminster interference in the right of Scots to decide their future. It's a way, simply a way to clear the road ahead. And after that, it's up to us." @SSalyers2@LiberationScot@broonpot@PAlanMcMahon@thomsonchris@CraigMurrayOrg@rblackqc@IndyScotParty@LiberateScot@SalvoHighlands@ScotSalvo
@STVNews Theyve completely screwed their Indy 2, by all their OWN behaviours.
THIS ON TOP OF SLIPPERY SWINNEYS NO ANSWERS TO WHY THEYRE STILL SKINT 🤔
I love it. Bye bye indy clowns 🤡
Kevin McKenna
"Only when John Swinney and his cronies are forced to resign can decency return to the cause of Scottish independence."
The full article
https://t.co/0uUO0XKWdI
@AndrewJQuinn97 Perhaps we should instead roll out the long overdue probe/inquiry into how the UK gov under Labour boastingly reserved powers over Scot's fundamental human right to freely decide their own future.
Then it's off to the Hague...
A Scottish government - that is to say a proper Scottish government, not an English administration managing the extraction of Scotland's resources on England's behalf and showing no interest in upsetting the schemes of international capital wrought at the expense of Scottish land, Scottish farmers and the common good of the nation of Scotland, would stop this in its tracks.
We Scots are the sovereign in Scotland; the territory is ours to say how it should be best used for the benefit of our people. The first thing that needs to be done is to test this territorial title. We saw last week in the case brought by Craig Murray to the Supreme Court what happens when the will of the English patriarchy is challenged; Scottish justice, one of the smokescreens of annexation, is trampled underfoot.
The only place to enforce our rights as a sovereign territorial people is in the international courts. Back Liberation Scotland to do just that.
I mean it's a pretty wild take that Chief Mammy and leader of the personality Cult of Sturgeon is just a wee betrayed wifey that had no idea what her "husband" was up to, I mean, for fuck sake, this woman orchestrated a conspiracy to bring down her mentor... Probably...🙄
I was at that meeting. JC is sharing facts.
Those attacking her need to ask themselves are they happy for our nation to be governed by dishonest shysters?
Are they happy to turn a blind eye when someone raising serious concerns is vilified? Really?😳
Nicola Sturgeon faced heavy scrutiny over the weekend over her apparent blindness to that motorhome. Matters worsened when she and her husband somehow ended up trapped in Gordon Brown’s cave of eternal despair.
Spare a thought for the Scots. It can’t be easy.
{satire}