🚨 FARAGE’S POLL GAME JUST GOT EXPOSED! 👀
For months, people have questioned whether Farage and Reform were manipulating the polling narrative.
Now Channel 4 has exposed Reform secretly commissioning and arranging “off the books” funding for polls — polls that went on to make national headlines.
And Farage himself? He called the polling “amazing” and said: “It worked. Boom.”
You really couldn’t write this stuff. 😂
The polls weren’t just politics. They were part of the strategy.
@BenGrahamUK “This includes examining restrictions on children’s use of AI chatbots, as well as options to age-restrict or limit children’s VPN use where it undermines safety protections and changing the age of digital consent,”
This only proposes to limit VPNs for children
🚨 NEW: The BBC has revealed Russia has been setting up fake far-right and Islamist groups in the UK to stoke division
Operatives paid people to vandalise mosques, spread extremist propaganda and inflame tensions after the Southport riots
🚨 Surrey Police have found no evidence that the alleged gang rape in Epsom took place "as described".
Furthermore, after extensive enquires including forensic & CCTV analysis, there is no evidence asylum seekers or foreign nationals were involved or indeed in the area.
🚨 What Has The Labour Government Done?
I didn’t vote for @UKLabour in #GE2024 and have been highly critical of both Labour and Starmer.
Polling shows pretty much everyone is dissapointed, and Labour has faced formidable difficulties in its PR - much of it self-inflicted.
In short, Labour has found it virtually impossible to persuade the public of its achievements and virtually no-one is aware of any of the good things that have happened.
This is partly because of mainstream news media, including a highly critical @BBC, but also because the Government has chosen to foreground measures which indicate that they don’t intend to behave like a Labour Government at all: e.g., abolishing the winter fuel allowance; cutting disability benefits; demonising and taking a hardline on immigration and especially asylum seekers; and reneging on its promises to reinstate welfare payments to couples with more than two children (almost all of them at least partially reversed, but after the damage was done).
So in the interests of balance, here’s a list of things that have been introduced since July 2024 that for some mysterious reason, many voters aren’t even aware of:
1. #NHS and Health
Put an extra £29 billion into the NHS – one of the largest funding boosts in many years.
Delivered over 4–5 million extra NHS appointments in the first year (more than double the original target of 2 million).
NHS waiting lists have fallen by around 230,000–312,000 – the lowest level in two years.
Gave above-inflation pay rises to NHS staff and ended long-running junior doctor strikes.
Recruited around 1,700–2,000 more GPs and introduced the first new GP contract in four years.
Started free breakfast clubs in hundreds of primary schools.
2. Jobs, Wages, and Worker Rights
Raised the National Living Wage – giving over 3 million people a pay rise (a full-time worker aged 21+ gets roughly £900–£1,400 extra per year).
Passed the Employment Rights Act – the biggest upgrade to worker rights in a generation, including:
Day-one protection against unfair dismissal for many workers.
Ending exploitative zero-hour contracts (right to guaranteed hours and notice of shifts).
Sick pay from day one for more low-paid workers.
Better rights to flexible working, paternity leave, and parental leave.
AND attracted £100–120 billion in new private investment, helping create more than 380,000 new jobs.
3. Housing and Renters
Passed the Renters’ Rights Act – banning “no-fault” evictions so tenants have much stronger protection.
Started major planning reforms to help build 1.5 million new homes over this parliament.
4. Energy and Environment
Set up Great British Energy – a new publicly owned company with £8.3 billion to invest in clean sustainable power like wind and solar.
Lifted the ban on new onshore wind farms in England and sped up renewable energy projects.
Aiming to make Britain a “clean energy superpower” with cheaper bills in the long term.
5. Cleaning Up Politics and Tackling Lobbying & Corruption
New Ethics and Integrity Commission launched in October 2025, replacing the old standards committee to oversee ethical behaviour by ministers, MPs, and public officials.
Tightened rules on MPs earning from paid lobbying jobs, removing exemptions that allowed MPs to be paid for giving advice on public policy or how Parliament works.
Stronger rules on political donations: Introduced the Representation of the People Bill (2026) to block foreign interference and hidden donations.
Tackling the “revolving door”: Introduced rules to stop former ministers and officials from immediately taking jobs with companies they used to regulate.
More transparency on lobbying: Reviewing the current lobbying register and publishing more frequent data; the PM asked the Ethics and Integrity Commission to carry out a full review in March 2026.
New Anti-Corruption Strategy (2025): Published December 2025 with 123 commitments to fight bribery and corruption, including appointing a new Anti-Corruption Champion.
Local government reforms: Plans for a mandatory code of conduct for councillors and creation of a Local Audit Office to improve oversight and reduce corruption risks.
6. Tackling Online Harms (including pornography and disinformation)
Rolling out the Online Safety Act: Inherited, but actively implemented and strengthened by Labour.
From March 2025, platforms must remove illegal content, including child sexual abuse material.
From July 2025, new rules to protect children from harmful content (pornography, self-harm, suicide, eating disorder material).
Age verification on major porn sites, ensuring children cannot access adult content.
@Ofcom issued fines (£1 million+) for non-compliant sites.
Extra protections against harmful content include upgraded cyber-flashing and encouragement of serious self-harm to priority offences and rules introduced for non-consensual intimate images, deepfakes, and nudification apps.
Action on disinformation:
Platforms must remove illegal disinformation; Ofcom set up an advisory committee to improve responses.
7. Tackling Child Sexual Abuse & Exploitation (including Grooming Gangs)
National Audit by Baroness Casey (June 2025):
Reviewed group-based child sexual exploitation and recommended reforms; all 12 recommendations accepted.
Independent Inquiry into Grooming Gangs (December 2025, started 2026): Chaired by Baroness Anne Longfield with full legal powers; £65 million budget over three years.
Accelerated police action and reopened cases: National operation reopened over 800 cases; Grooming Gangs Taskforce contributed to hundreds of arrests, including 597 in late 2024.
New national taskforce and local support: Specialist taskforce for councils and police; new centre of expertise for best practices.
Updates to the Tackling Child Sexual Abuse Strategy (April 2025):
Better victim support, independent review routes, and stronger multi-agency working.
But anyway, APART from improving the NHS and the nation’s health, making more jobs, improving wages for the low-paid and worker rights, taking measures to improve housing and life for renters, cleaning up politics and tackling lobbying and corruption, tackling online harms including pornography and disinformation, tackling child sexual abuse and exploitation, including grooming gangs, stopping widespread train strikes early and starting to bring rail services back into public ownership, setting up a new Border Security Command to tackle small boat crossings, paying compensation to victims of the infected blood scandal, delivering real-terms wage growth and implementing several interest rate cuts, starting work on lifting hundreds of thousands of children out of poverty including changes to benefits, and, excluding the COVID‑related disruption, cutting net migration to its lowest level since before the UK left the EU in 2016 - APART FROM THAT, WHAT HAS THE LABOUR GOVERNMENT EVER DONE FOR US?
https://t.co/ACeyWJ5o8n
Science is the cure for religion.
The fossils on Qomolangma (Everest) are about 450 million years old. They are shallow sea-water shell hashes from before the tectonic plate was lifted.
That photo and discoveries along the mountain include trilabites. They went extinct 252 million years ago (Everest started to form about 60 million years ago).
Earth would need 5.8 billion cubic km of water to flood to the top of Everest. Earth has a TOTAL 1.3 billion cubic km of water.
IF earth had enough water to flood the entire planet all the way to the top of everything (it doesn't), it would take a very long time for those shells to form AND fossilize there, and according to the fairy tales, the flood lasted only a year.
And none of those sea creatures found fossilized would be able to form in such low salinity and high elevation. At 8,900 meters above sea level, the temperature is -46°C/-50°F. Everything would freeze to death.
Additionally....
The flood myth - originally the Epic of Gilgamesh - happened 2500 BCE. It would have wiped out all existing cultures.... including the Greeks, Egyptians, Indus Valley, Mesoamerica, and YET.... we have uninterrupted chrological histories from every one of them.
There are a great many scientific and historical reasons why the flood myth is known to be a farce. But it's the physics of the planet that really destroy the narrative.
#KnowledgeIsPower
Labour's new temporary refugee status leaves LGBT+ asylum seekers (& other refugees) living under a “constant threat” of removal
For people fleeing persecution, the insecurity of temporary refuge isn’t protection; it’s trauma prolonged 🏳️🌈
https://t.co/OslBbDLHzl
Here's the "Academic Phrasebank," a 156-page PDF, to help you become a better academic writing.
Download the PDF for free by clicking the link below.
Follow Silvi on LinkedIn for more tips and free resources on systematic reviews and academic writing.
https://t.co/Yc1f8akZ7F
There are largely two types of academics: A and B. Their worlds are so different, so insular they don't even know the other type exists.
Type A:
> Comes from a middle, upper-middle class family
> Well-educated parents (with advanced degrees including PhDs)
> Parents map out their kid's career trajectory
> Parents teach academia's hidden curriculum: applications, admission essays, extracurriculars, and so on.
> Send the kid to a "good" school (private or private tutoring)
> Kid gets good grades
> Goes to Ivy League or Oxbridge or a similar top school for undergrad
> Decides to do a PhD
> Gets into another top program in a top school because of top undergrad school, duh
> Gets a well-connected supervisor during PhD
> Gets a tenure-track job offer from another top university in the final year of PhD even before graduation because of the supervisor, duh
> Fully understands the tenure clock
> Publishes papers, monographs on time
> Gets tenure
> Thinks PhD is easy, tenure is easy, academia is easy
> Marries a colleague in the same university
> Has kids
> The cycle repeats
Type B:
> Comes from a dysfunctional, working-class family
> Parents who barely graduate high school
> Parents with no idea what kind of education their kids need
> Goes to a no-name shit school with underqualified teachers
> Then goes to a community college or some such institution if lucky, joins the military if unlucky (KIA.exe)
> Reads a lot, become autodidact, becomes a half-decent writer
> Someone suggests, do a PhD, become a professor
> Likes the idea of academic life, starts applying to PhD programs
> Gets rejected from top programs because don't have good recommendation letters or connections
> Goes to a third tier PhD program in a university located in the middle of nowhere
> PhD stipend is not enough, has to work part-time to make ends meet
> Lives in a shitty apartment, sometimes eats at the soup kitchen
> Still works hard and publishes a bunch of papers
> Thinks I'll write my way out of poverty
> Sees a bunch of Type A PhDs in conferences, tries to "network" with them, Type A folks recognize Type B PhDs and stay away from them.
> Defends PhD where the committee says this is excellent work and imminently publishable
> Applies to tenure-track jobs left, right, and center. Gets rejected from everywhere
> Idea of being unemployed with a PhD causes desperation
> Gets a temporary teaching job, gets paid per course basis with no health benefits
> Spends a few years as adjunct with semester to semester renewal of job contract
> Barely survives, has to take up part-time jobs
> Get a one-year postdoc, decides to turn PhD dissertation into a monograph in the hopes it will get tenure-track job
> Postdoc ends, back to temporary adjunct jobs
> Monograph stays incompelete, no time to work on it
> Tries moving out of academia, is considered over-qualified
> Reads social media posts by Type A academics saying PhD is easy, academia is easy
> Thinks, what could I have done better?
@AsylumMatters The British public is compassionate — no matter how hard some try to demonise the vulnerable.
Every signature is a message to Parliament:
Humanity still matters.
https://t.co/Dw81nVFOJ1