את האמת. בעיקר עצוב לי.
הייתה לנו הזדמנות להקים קואליציה ליברלית רחבה שמשקפת את בחירתם של רוב תושבי ת״א.
במקום זה שוב ניצחה הנקמנות הפוליטית את קול ההגיון והשפיות.
דווקא בעת הזו ואחרי כל מה שעברנו בישראל בשנה וחצי האחרונה, ת״א הייתה אמורה להיות המגדלור.
@seanbax@CppSage@atomgalaxy That specific UB also “applies” to functions that return ‘objects with a promise_type’ which innocent readers might think are coroutines. I learned that here: https://t.co/uzGSlmLFAh (@Superlokkus)
@seanbax Is it more complicated to add a use-after-move static analysis (as part of acopiler or linter) than to add the notion of destructive move to the language?
The Jerusalem Post can now confirm based on verified photos of the bodies that the reports of babies being burnt and decapitated in Hamas's assault on Kfar Aza are correct.
May their memory be a blessing.
https://t.co/LaVs1aXR50
The 90-year-old Holocaust survivor Gina Smiatich was murdered in her own home in Kibbutz Kissufim by Hamas.
She was dragged out of a shelter, taken to her living room, forced to kneel and then shot in the back of her head.
@hankadusikova I really like the all() function that takes a range<task<T>> and returns a task<vector<T>>. I guess functional programmers have a name for such types of functions
@vector_of_bool I believe this term came out as an offspring of the term “feature engineering” - considered an “inelegant” part of other ML algorithms. Deep neural networks promised to free us from ‘feature engineering’ - but then ‘prompt engineering’ emerged instead for large models.
@supahvee1234@david_sankel@corecpp Great content, indeed. I also liked that you based a lot of it on contribution that you made to SFML, and the citations/links to your empirical results
@ericniebler@zygoloid@nagyegrimate The standard does say (https://t.co/8lR6oYiu96) that “Standard-layout classes are useful for communicating with code written in other programming languages”. I guess other c++ compilers are further away than other programming languages…
@seanbax@__qualname__@pdimov2@david_sankel Thanks Sean. As the thread mentions - it seems that the std::simd is in the works, and I'm excited on one hand and concerned about the best ways to reach something that's actually meaningful for those that need more than auto-vectorization
@seanbax@__qualname__@pdimov2@david_sankel Cheers, thanks for the quick response and fix.
I wonder if you think the ‘chunk’ approach is artificial, or what might be a common/typical way for people to try and manually leverage simd in their code
@seanbax@__qualname__@pdimov2@david_sankel I think that a mix of implicit conversion from scalar to vector and implicit conversion of 'bool vectors' to bool might lead people to unexpected results. It seems that in Circle the latter is explicit which makes things less error-prone.
Example: https://t.co/H7dwRefZmW