AI ethics & Privacy lawyer, #legaltech expert. Battling the soulless minions of orthodoxy. All opinions my own, even snark I really should blame on someone else
To my friends and connections here - I have stayed because I can connect with many of you nowhere else. I had hoped things would get better. Now it is clear that they won't.
Musk has the Nazi cesspool he wants: https://t.co/PlNTX6B7O5
See you on LinkedIN, I guess . . .
@jontalotta@RadioFreeTom Hey! What's a little Fascism if it helps sell subscriptions, right?
I mean, think of those big bonuses the NYT editors will get to spend . . . before they are carted away to "Reducation Camps," that is.
@Judgeschlegel If they typed their brief in Word, they used AI - not just for the spell and grammar-checks, but for the next-word suggestions
Is that "generative AI" versus "predictive AI?" That's semantics, and all generative AI is (at least for now) just prediction at massive scale
@ronfriedmann@FT Of course!
We are almost always hearing only the perspective of those engaged in the high-level intellectual work of our profession
Survivorship bias is a thing, and it is very real in Legal
@ronfriedmann@FT My "favorite" one so far is a recent ACEDS post by a judge explaining in great detail the high-level intellectual pursuits that lawyers do that AI can never replace - while saying that AI will eliminate all of the "lesser" work, i.e., 90% of what associates and paralegals do
@ronfriedmann@FT Cue the anguished counter-tweets by those who keep telling us that AI will never replace lawyers because it will just replace all that "drudge work" instead, while ignoring that so much of what we do - and charge for - is, in fact, drudge work
@nikiblack@Slate Also, the level of recursiveness here is yet to be determined . . . there may well be several layers of our new robot overlords needed to save us from our new robot overlords
Perhaps it is new robot overlords all the way down?
In any event, I, for one, shall welcome them all!