@AlanRichar6162@CARLMARJORAM It's a good point until you realise that spurs broke the British transfer record multiple times and the players that were bought won about 10 trophies. You bought your success and legacy but don't want any other teams to do the same.
@smxthfc I understand your point. Ours is how do we ever get to match or exceed your revenues when we have to keep selling our best players and start again.
@JS05956106@gazi1684@sufferingspurs Isnt that the point? If you're allowed to spend money, you might win trophies. You point to 3 signings during two seasons on some poxy chart and say we didn't win anything. No but we came fucking second twice. It wasn't as if we got relegated.
@JS05956106@gazi1684@sufferingspurs Were your owners pumping you full of money when you broke the British transfer records to sign Greavesy, Chivers, Peters or Gazza?
@JS05956106@gazi1684@sufferingspurs We had bigger revenues than you virtually every season since Deloitte started publishing the rich list in 97/98. And we didn't win anything in that period but we were in Europe quite a bit. That was your metric of success in your original post wasn't it?
@NicoAnelka9@Adam_Paul_T@InsideN17 Yep, I'm bald. Enjoyed schooling you on football tonight tit. Now go and get some sleep before work at McDonald's tomorrow.
@NicoAnelka9@Adam_Paul_T@InsideN17 Check Deloitte and touche rich list based on venues season on season. You'll see we're in the top 10 revenues when they started compiling the info (you're near the bottom) See if you notice a steady decline under the 14 years of Ashley ownership. You got THE answer. TIT.
@Redevils20Times No I doubt he was because other clubs were allowed to spend whatever they wanted too. And anyway we could just use your logic and say we were able to spend because our average prem finish was 3rd at that stage. Revenue, revenue blah blah.
@HuntaThePunta2 Quite happy to concede you were talking shite about the Sunday league but still want your argument taken seriously. You're a lying cunt.