There are military threats to Britain? Well, it's lucky our government spent the last half century making patriotism illegal and importing medieval child rapists.
I'm sure Brits will be champing at the bit to leave their kids unprotected to go and die for land they're told they have no claim to.
Ask yourself: what kind of force drafts an official statement three days after a teenager’s death that effectively paints him as the aggressor — and only rows back when the family’s fury makes it politically impossible?
What kind of chief constable signs off a culture where the priority, in the immediate aftermath of a fatal stabbing, is not “how did we fail him?” but “how do we protect ourselves?”
The IOPC has already confirmed it is investigating the officers’ contact with Henry, including the use of handcuffs and first aid, yet Hampshire briefed The Telegraph that there is “no indication of misconduct” and that all officers are merely “witnesses”.
This looks less like accountability and more like an early attempt to lock in a “nothing to see here” narrative before the watchdog has even finished.
When a chief constable presides over a force that handcuffs a dying boy, drafts victim‑blaming lines, meddles in a live trial, and then rushes out exonerating briefings for his own officers, the problem is not rogue PCs — it’s the man at the top.
🚨 THE MOST BLATANT, UNDENIABLE EXAMPLE OF TWO-TIER POLICING YOU WILL EVER SEE! 😡
A police liaison officer is filmed calmly addressing a large group of Muslim men outside a mosque in Stoke-on-Trent (Staffordshire Police, near Darul Falah Mosque in Hanley) amid disorder.
His exact words, spoken through a megaphone:
“If there’s any weapons or anything like that, what I would do is discard them at the mosque.”
“Don’t give anybody any reason to have any interaction with the police, so if there’s any weapons, get rid of them. We are not going to arrest anybody.”
Absolutely staggering. No searches. No arrests. Just friendly advice to stash the weapons inside the mosque and carry on.
Imagine if it was a group of white English lads tooled up with knives, bats or worse in the middle of the same chaos. We’d have seen riot gear deployed, police dogs, baton charges, mass arrests, air support, the full works, followed by blanket media coverage branding them “far-right thugs”.
Instead? A calm, helpful suggestion. A quiet word of advice: “Just discard them in the mosque, lads.”
This is blatant, on-camera proof of two-tier policing happening openly in the UK.
The force itself admitted this footage damaged public confidence. No wonder.
They know the state works for them and not you, and they know they're all in it together.
Pay attention. This is the country you live in as a second-class colonised person.
Three days after Henry Nowak died in police handcuffs, Hampshire Constabulary drafted a statement calling him the aggressor.
They knew his killer was a liar. They wrote it anyway.
Then they tried to brief the public mid-trial about “disinformation.”
Resign.
>Be Vickrum Digwas neighbours
>3 years ago
>Hear gunfire
>Take a video of Digwa shooting
>Report it to the police
>Police say they can't do anything
>Since reports from other residents
>Therefore this report isn't real
The warning signs were there.
Yet prevent only visit White patriots.
NEW: Sunday Times reports Hampshire Police wanted to portray Henry Nowak as the aggressor in a statement THREE DAYS after his death.
They changed the wording after outrage from his grieving family.
By that point, police had ample evidence that the killer, Digwa, was a liar.
Imagine being remanded in custody for pushing a wheely bin towards police but being let off after repeatedly punching and breaking a policewomans nose.
Now imagine our PM trying to convince us that there's not two tier policing.
Anyone else struggling to understand how the courts and British justice can move within 24 hours against an angry fella pushing a bin but everything else takes months if not years to be heard?
@KemiBadenoch And yet, not one of you have reached out to meet me, the mother of Rhiannon Whyte? Or help me get answers . I really hope Henry's family get the peace they deserve, because I know I won't, yet I've tried so many times.
You know you live in the UK when Keir Starmer politicises Adolescence, a fictional series where the culprit is white. However, he doesn’t want to bring politics into Henry Nowak, where the victim is white.
Last week we were told that 2 violent muslim thugs that started a fight in Manchester Airport and then violently assaulted 3 police officers who tried to arrest them, would practically walk away scott free.
Today, the same day Sir Rodney says there is no such thing as Two Tier policing, a white British man is spent straight to prison for "pushing a bin at a police officer"
Hi @unisouthampton
After Black Lives Matter, you set up scholarships for black students only.
What are you doing in response to Henry Nowak, your student?
Asking on behalf of millions of others.
Thanks.
Well let me get out my tiny violin. Do you know who definitely will never return home again because your disgusting family conspired to prevent him from getting help for the wounds inflicted on him by your murderous scumbag grandson? HENRY.
Grandmother of Henry Nowak’s killer COMPLAINS that her family are “living in fear” and are considering leaving Southampton but “don't have anywhere else to go.”
Bimla Kaur has complained that her family may never return to their “house again” after her grandson stabbed Nowak to death.
“It's not safe for them to be in their home because it was targeted the other night and it's only a matter of time before it is attacked again…I'm not sure if they'll ever return to that house again.”
The grandmother of Vickrum Digwa has said the family are “living in fear” following outrage over the families involvement which includes the killers mother hiding the knife used to stab Nowak.
“We're all living in fear because we've also had some threats and are worried that we might also get attacked.
But we've been in this city a long time, our whole extended family is here, and we don't have anywhere else to go.”
Source: Daily Mail
@JeremyVineOn5 Amazing that the man in charge of renewables, tells the country we need to eat less red meat and drink less milk to save the world but at the same time wants land for renewables. But no media outlet put the two together.
Remember when the families of the victims murdered in Nottingham by Valdo Calocane were forced to sign NDA's by the IOPC because they didnt want the truth coming out about the report of the police failings.
It doesn't matter how many times Keir Starmer says lessons will be learnt the fact is nothing ever changes. 🤬
I think you've misunderstood me, or have conflated things that other people have said with what I have said.
I don't advocate for arbitrarily mistreating decent people. My position has never been to expel every non-British person from the country on ethnic grounds. I advocate for policies based on behaviour.
I advocate for the preferences and prejudices of the British people to be the priority of the nation-state.
Meaning, if we decide to ban the kirpan, or ban halal slaughter, or end all immigration from India, we should do that in the interests of the British people. Special pleading by this group or that country shouldn't affect that decision.
As for Sikhs standing alongside the English: against Islam, yes. (That wretched Hope Not Hate cretin and his cosignatories on that letter yesterday aside.)
But to change the political system to one which isn't obsessed with "minority rights", granting special exemptions to other religions than Christianity, or which bans legal migration Muslim and non-Muslim countries alike? I doubt it.
As for my personal experience: I did go to a "diverse" school in London, though mine was predominantly Indian and west African, rather than Muslim and Sikh.
The kids were mostly nice, a few drug dealers and delinquents aside. But there was a natural tribalism among kids of different ethnic backgrounds. Sometimes it was banter, sometimes it caused conflict.
But given my children will be a minority among their own generation by 2031, I don't think that natural tribalism, regardless of religion, will mean they feel they possess their own country, or can expect the same generosity from their peers that an English majority would show towards a Sikh minority.
I want to do all that is moral and reasonable to stop that from happening.
There are also conflicts between cultures that aren't just Islamic. The Paan spat on streets in Indian areas of London. The rates of cousin marriage among non-Muslim Indians. The ethnic nepotism. The concept of Izzat, allowing people to lie to gain social standing. These are complaints shared by Americans and Canadians who have seen Sikh and Hindu migration, and seen their high trust society destroyed by foreign customs and beliefs.
Happy to discuss this in a longer format, in person.
We should retire the phrase "two-tier policing." Not because it's not true - as per official police materials, it pretty clearly is - but because it goes nowhere near far enough.
When you look at tragedies like the death of Henry Nowak and try to capture it with a term like "two-tier policing", you end up inadvertently masking a vast constitutional catastrophe underneath a complaint about general procedure, something a review and a reworded leaflet can put right.
What happened to Nowak is a single visible outcrop of something far larger and far worse: the capture, one institution at a time, of the British state by the belief-system of a particular class. It is something to which the public are, slowly-but-surely, awakening, but it's well short of the reckoning it requires.
After all, we have a word for people who steal from an institution. We call it corruption - it is endemic in British public life, by the way - and we know what to do about it. But we have no working word for the thing that is worse: an ideology quietly replacing an institution's reason for existing. A virus of the institutional mind, a toxin of the institutional soul.
A police force exists to protect the public. But a captured police force exists to advertise its own virtue, and will leave the public to bleed on a pavement to do it. You needn't take this on faith: they wrote it down. The police's own Race Action Plan states, in black and white, that equal treatment is the very thing it has set itself against. The institution rewrote its purpose and published the confession, though it expects your submission, rather than your forgiveness.
Nowak's death is the product of that inversion. An officer trained to treat the accusation of racism as the most urgent fact in the room met a dying boy and a lying killer and performed exactly as trained. Nothing has malfunctioned here, nothing at all. The system did precisely what it is now built to do.
And it's not one rogue patrol, either, though the truculence of the Hampshire police commissioner in the face of his officers' malfeasance might tempt you to think otherwise. The same disease runs through institutions with nothing else in common.
Consider William Shawcross' review of Prevent, which found a counter-terror system so warped by fear of the word "Islamophobia" that barely a fifth of its referrals concerned Islamism, while four-fifths of live terror investigations did: an apparatus that exists to see the threat, trained not to look at it. Closer to home, we all know how forces now log tens of thousands of "non-crime hate incidents" - speech that broke no law - while most actual thefts end without a suspect even being sought. Captured institutions keep working. They simply pour their effort into whatever the creed rewards.
None of this is mysterious. Robert Conquest's old law holds that any institution not deliberately kept to its purpose drifts, sooner or later, toward the reigning orthodoxy. Bolt onto that a personnel machine - the diversity directorate, the recruitment that quietly screens for the right opinions - that makes careers out of professing the creed and ends them for doubting it, and the capture becomes self-sealing, because the captured now do the hiring.
What turns this from a blunder into a betrayal is who holds the beliefs and who pays for them. These are what Rob Henderson calls luxury beliefs, and beneath them sits the truth Christopher Lasch named thirty years ago in The Revolt of the Elites: a credentialed class that has seceded from the common life and no longer shares the nation's fate. The beliefs are status markers, costless to the people who profess them, because that class is insulated by the good postcode and the private option from every consequence of what it believes. The bill falls entirely on the people without the buffers - the boy stabbed on a night out, the girl in a town the council won't name being pimped around a circuit of cab drivers who may well be flying their cousins in from overseas to join in their activities.
A doctrine experienced as compassion by the people who hold it that is paid for in the blood of the people who don't.
And when one of those victims dies on camera, the same class looks the country in the eye and tells you that the thing you have just watched didn't happen, and that to have noticed it is the real bigotry.
There's no point talking about reviews or inquiries. We're passed that point. If you want this to stop, you need to be thinking about institutional recapture. We need to commit people, means, and time to the task of hauling each institution back to the job it was built for:
- The police to protect
- The courts to judge on the evidence according to law delivered by a mandated parliament
- Local councils devoted to matters of local import, rather than those which spend their times siphoning away procurement funds and pontificating on matters of obscure foreign policy
...and restoring the most unfashionable principle left in British life, that the state is blind to who you are and answerable only to the truth. Equality before the law is part of the great inheritance we have bequeathed the world, and it has been taken from us on purpose, by people convinced they knew better.
It was taken from us because we were too weak. It is our disgrace and a blotch on our history. But we can return it to ourselves, and return it we must.