https://t.co/vRfcKylyMS
Nick Shapiro and BL Bots are out and at it again, trying to suppress the truth of a video gaining traction... Nothing that is even rude or fabrications, complete TRUTH that is getting suppressed because they don't want the public to see the opposition!
@schatow@BurnerLys All of this!
I wanted to write more to clarify on one or two of my points but I can only write so much before X yells that I don't have much space left. ๐คฃ So I figured someone would come in and make a few more points/clarifications
We'll see how many crazed fans go to Madison Square Garden hoping to get a look at Taylor, just to find out they were all tricked by their 'mother' because she doesn't ACTUALLY want her fans to know or be there ๐คฃ๐คฃ
๐ฐโโ๏ธ EXCLUSIVE: Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce invite over 1,000 people to Madison Square Garden wedding.
Everything we know: https://t.co/qgmB8i0PKr
@BurnerLys@schatow Wouldn't that be nice? The individuals sued by Blake, a lot of them requested sanctions or for their attorney fees to be paid (I think) and Liman basically ignored it until Lively withdrew all of them, and then Liman 'denied' the requests for sanctions/fees from the CC's as moot.
@TVMovieAddict This instantly reminded me of Brian Freedman's comment about Lively speaking at Madison Square Garden to mock her claims that she was unafraid and willing to speak her 'truth' ๐คฃ๐คฃ
https://t.co/o1wDMs8y8J
Great explanation of the Authorship Queen's attempt to try to nationalize this law, and only doing damage to how it is seen by the world!
So let's clarify: the disappointment (and essentially blame) in this statement is put upon the VICTIM who created & authored this legislation, instead of on the ABUSER who is weaponizing this legislation and tarnishing it's reputation by being associated with BL?
Wow, okay.
@hi_gaggy@TMZ Yeah, she had no issues at the beginning, because Blake's lies and true motive were not revealed for the whole world to see yet. Now that she has seen Blake's TRUE intentions - and the fact her lawyers tried changing the law's language - she absolutely SHOULD feel this way now.
@rubirosa77@TMZ And there were ZERO lies detected in her assessment of Blake's intentions. Because Blake doesn't actually support women, she only supports herself taking authorship of ANYTHING she can get her grubby, greedy hands on!
@MontelongoApri2 100%! If she was trying to "support all women," why was she unwilling to work with the author of this legislation? Instead, she allowed her lawyers to steal authorship over the law and make changes to it to protect themselves from something - repercussions, probably!
And here is the post, where she states her concern over BL's weaponization of her bill!
Her lawyers should be ashamed. BL's lawsuit is an insult to those who were MEANT TO BE PROTECTED by this bill, and will tarnish the bill's reputation by the fact of how easily it was abused!
@patti_hm Yes, I saw her video! BL, her lawyers, everyone affiliated with her... Should be absolutely disgusted with themselves, and ashamed at their actions... Stomping all over the survivor that authored this legislation, to try to take it over and publicize it? Horrendous!
@sallysmith7576 The audacity is just.. I don't even have words. The fact that she asked BL's team to talk to her first and they were like "nah BL wants to go national with this FIRST," and just fkn did it anyways?! And THEN the fact her lawyers tried to modify the law's language to protect them?
https://t.co/2P3zUzxfwR
The SURVIVOR that inspired the ยง47.1 bill to become law, was on Megyn Kelly's podcast - And though I have no opinion on Megyn..
This survivor has stayed that Blake is WEAPONIZING the new law, and that Blake's LAWYER attempted to ADD language to it! ๐คข๐คฎ
WOW
๐๐
The author of CA 47.1 said she doesn't appreciate Lively using it as a PR redemption tool, and doesn't think the Judge should grant fees!
Credit: https://t.co/lMvgwEahTM