Free-thinker, non-conformist, intellectual, MOM, professional, awakened, empath, self-actualizing. Always on the lookout for logical and rational discussion.
Arne Burkhardt opened the bodies.
What he found should have stopped everything. Vaccine-derived spike protein in heart tissue.
In blood vessel walls. In brain tissue. In multiple organs across multiple cases. Not in one anomalous death.
Consistently. Repeatedly.
With inflammatory patterns and lymphocytic infiltrates that follow directly from the known mechanism of mRNA vaccination, widespread, systemic spike protein production that the manufacturers and regulators always claimed would stay local and resolve quickly. It did not stay local. It did not resolve quickly.
Burkhardt found it persisting in the deceased, distributed throughout organ systems, accompanied by the exact tissue damage you would predict if you believed Sucharit Bhakdi’s warnings about endothelial cells producing spike protein and triggering immune attack from within.
The mechanism is not complicated once you accept what the biodistribution data already showed.
Lipid nanoparticles do not remain at the injection site. Pfizer’s own Japanese biodistribution study, obtained through freedom of information requests, showed accumulation in the liver, adrenal glands, ovaries, and beyond.
When those nanoparticles reach tissue, cells take up the mRNA, produce spike protein, and display it on their surface. The immune system recognizes it as foreign and attacks. In the heart, that means myocarditis. In vessel walls, that means vascular inflammation. In the brain, that means neurological damage.
Burkhardt’s autopsies are not speculation, they are the physical, histological confirmation of a mechanism that was biologically predictable and institutionally ignored.
In many of these cases, no other plausible cause of death was identified. These were not people with terminal diagnoses or obvious competing explanations. They were people who died in proximity to vaccination, whose deaths were documented, whose tissues were examined by a trained pathologist, and whose organs showed the fingerprints of spike protein-driven inflammation. That is not a coincidence. That is evidence. And health agencies have responded to that evidence by downplaying it, dismissing Burkhardt’s methodology, discouraging thorough post-mortem investigation, and refusing any systematic, government-funded autopsy program that might produce data they cannot control.
They knew the biodistribution data before a single dose was administered to the public. They had Pfizer’s own studies showing the lipid nanoparticles traveled. They authorized anyway. They mandated anyway. They silenced the clinicians and pathologists raising concerns anyway. And now, faced with autopsy findings that document spike protein in the organs of the dead, they respond not with investigation but with institutional silence and the quiet suppression of inconvenient science. That is not a public health apparatus functioning in good faith. That is an apparatus protecting itself.
The dead cannot demand answers. The injured, many of whom carry the same spike-driven inflammatory damage in living tissue, are told their symptoms are unrelated, psychosomatic, or coincidental. Burkhardt’s work, alongside the vascular findings documented by Bhakdi and colleagues, represents a body of post-market evidence that should have triggered immediate regulatory review, mandatory autopsy protocols, and full transparency on biodistribution. Instead it has been buried, not by counter-evidence, not by superior data, but by institutional authority and the refusal to look.
This is what burying evidence looks like. It does not always involve shredded documents or deleted files. Sometimes it looks like a regulatory agency that simply never funds the study, never mandates the autopsy, never convenes the independent panel and then points to the absence of data it refused to generate as proof that there is nothing to find.
The LARGEST human ivermectin cancer study EVER conducted found 84% of cancer patients declared COMPLETE REMISSION, TUMOR SHRINKAGE, or HALTED TUMOR GROWTH.
Our study is now PEER-REVIEWED and PUBLISHED by the International Institute of Anticancer Research.
The tide is turning.
96% of patients declared COMPLETE REMISSION of alpha-gal syndrome after ear acupuncture — lasting months to years.
Basically EVERYONE in the study could eat meat again within weeks of undergoing Soliman Auricular Allergy Treatment (SAAT).
There were ZERO adverse reactions.
Dandelion root eliminates 95% of cancer cells in the lab — cuts human colon tumor growth in mice by over 90% with ZERO harm to healthy cells.
Canada green-lit human trials in 2012... then it was BURIED.
Common backyard plants terrify the Chemo Cartel.
Dr. Ben Carson urges, "Do NOT allow what was done during COVID to be 'swept under the rug'."
"Dr. Fauci admitted there was no science behind ANY of what he was saying."
"We know the side effects from COVID vaccinations far exceed anything else in the last 30 years combined."
I cannot emphasize strongly enough how corrosive it is for society, to have people dying left and right from the Covid shots, yet there's no official acknowledgement from the federal government, the media, or the medical community that this is happening and that this is a crisis.
If you are injured in a vaccine clinical trial, they will deny your injury, not help you as promised, and not report it.
This story is remarkable because Olivia had such strong evidence linking her injury to Moderna, outside doctors agreed, but even then, this is what happened.
The vaccine injury cover-up continues…
Federal health officials used a flawed algorithm they were warned was hiding COVID injection injury safety signals, and apparently they are now using it to hide all vaccine injury safety signals.
This corruption must be exposed, and the legacy media must start reporting on it.
"You are not a horse. You are not a cow." Remember that infamous FDA tweet?
It wasn't just insulting; it was a violation of their authority. We took the FDA to federal court for spreading misinformation and forcing a false narrative onto patients and physicians. We won the case, but the fight to educate the public on the safety of these treatments is just beginning.
BREAKING: Largest Human Cancer Study of Ivermectin + Mebendazole Is Now PEER-REVIEWED and PUBLISHED in a MAJOR Cancer Journal
84.4% of cancer patients taking ivermectin + mebendazole for 6 months declared either CANCER DISAPPEARANCE, TUMOR REGRESSION, or CANCER STABILIZATION.
Our study, “Real-world Clinical Outcomes of Ivermectin and Mebendazole in Cancer Patients: Results from a Prospective Observational Cohort,” is now peer-reviewed and published in Anticancer Research—a major international oncology journal of the International Institute of Anticancer Research (IIAR), established in 1995.
The results represent one of the most compelling clinical signals ever documented for repurposed anti-parasitic therapies in oncology.
A diverse population of cancer patients (n=197) was prescribed compounded ivermectin–mebendazole through a U.S. telemedicine platform, with each capsule containing 25 mg ivermectin and 250 mg mebendazole.
Participants were followed for approximately six months using standardized digital surveys assessing cancer outcomes, medication adherence, and tolerability.
At approximately six months post-treatment initiation, we observed an 84.4% Clinical Benefit Ratio (CBR)—meaning more than four out of five patients reported either:
No evidence of disease (32.8%)
Tumor regression (15.6%)
or Cancer stabilization (36.1%)
Importantly, adherence was remarkably high, with 86.9% completing the initial prescription and 66.4% remaining on therapy at six months.
Side effects were predominantly mild and manageable, reported in 25.4% of patients (primarily gastrointestinal), with 93.6% of those experiencing side effects continuing treatment after minor dosing adjustments.
This groundbreaking peer-reviewed publication was made possible through a unique collaboration between The Wellness Company, the McCullough Foundation, and the Chairman of the President’s Cancer Panel—uniting real-world clinical data, frontline medical experience, and epidemiologic expertise to evaluate inexpensive, repurposed therapies with major translational potential.
With these extraordinarily promising results, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials are now required.
In the meantime, many cancer patients are exercising their right to try.
@twc_health@McCulloughFund@IIAR_Journals@P_McCulloughMD@DrHarveyRisch@DrKellyVictory@jathorpmfm@drdrew@PeterGillooly@FosterCoulson
We found 84.4% of cancer patients taking ivermectin and mebendazole for 6 months declared either COMPLETE REMISSION, TUMOR SHRINKAGE, or HALTED TUMOR GROWTH.
It’s no surprise the CIA BURIED a 1950s study for over HALF A CENTURY showing anti-parasitics disrupt cancer growth.
At the height of COVID, a “crazy” doctor was treating patients with a 99.96% survival rate.
Dr. Zelenko’s protocol was so effective, it sparked a war against HCQ.
They mocked his claims, but they kept coming true. Here’s what he said:
#1 - “Not everyone got the same thing.”
These triplets who all became severely autistic hours after the same pneumococcal vaccine is irrefutable proof vaccines cause autism.
Notably all three also lost their cranial reflexes, mirroring decades of data vaccine-induced microstrokes cause brain damage SIDS and autism by causing the blood cells in the body to electrically clump together, thereby obstructing the smallest blood vessels in the brain (along with .
Remarkably, these microstrokes are very easy to detect once you know how to look for them, and it eye-opening how common they are.🧵
We didn’t need a sophisticated algorithm to see that the COVID injection was causing a great deal of harm.
The massive volume of adverse events was a safety signal screaming at all of us.
Did you know that many pediatricians require parents, as a condition for seeing their child, to agree to vaccinate their kids…?
If the parents say they don’t want to vaccinate their children, the pediatrician simply tells them they can’t treat the child…
Clearly, here’s the answer to that…
Many of them don’t actually care about the children, only about the incentives they receive from pharmaceutical companies….
“I published a study proving that vaccinated children were 500% more ill…and then I got a call from my attorney saying that my licence was suspended”
Dr. Paul Thomas studied more than 3,000 children and proved that unvaccinated children were healthier than vaccinated children.
Here’s what his data showed for illnesses in the vaccinated:
Fever – 9.1X higher in vaccinated
Ear Pain – 3.4X higher
Otitis Media (Ear Infections) – 2.9X higher
Conjunctivitis – 2.4X higher
Eye Disorders (Other) – 1.8X higher
Asthma – 5.2X higher
Allergic Rhinitis (Hay Fever) – 6.9X higher
Sinusitis – 4.3X higher
Breathing Issues – 2.9X higher
Anemia – 5.5X higher
Eczema – 4.5X higher
Urticaria (Hives) – 2.1X higher
Dermatitis – 1.4X higher
Behavioral Issues – 4.1X higher
Gastroenteritis – 4.7X higher
Weight/Eating Disorders – 2.5X higher
ADHD – 0 cases in unvaccinated group
ALL major artificial intelligence systems — SuperGrok, ChatGPT, and Google Gemini — independently concluded that VACCINES CAUSE AUTISM after analyzing our landmark 82-page study.
The 30-year lie that “vaccines don’t cause autism” has officially been TERMINATED.
Hannah Poling Case is a Compelling Vignette
Combinations of vaccines can trigger autism in susceptible babies. US Omnibus Autism Proceeding held pursuant to the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program--5,617 petitioners in Court of Federal Claims 2002, including autism victim Hannah Poling, daughter of Johns Hopkins neurologist Jonathan Poling, MD. Courtesy Lila Rose Show @LilaGraceRose
Did you know that MMR vaccine uptake plummeted in the late 1990s—right after Dr. Andrew Wakefield’s controversial study?
In countries like the UK and Norway, coverage actually fell below 90%.
And guess what happened next?
Autism rates declined, too.
Seriously.
And when vaccine uptake climbed back up again? So did the rates of autism.
They’ll call that coincidence. But the data says otherwise.