SIGzero989

[SIGzero989 @SIGzero989]

Right, and those construction jobs will now disappear along with money that should've cycled through our economy.

There are many other construction jobs that will be lost due to amendment 3, the road construction is just the tip of the iceberg.

When our economy is impacted by a loss of revenue, plus the loss of property-tax plus a very delicate housing market only equals a huge crash coming.

[SIGzero989 @SIGzero989]

@RichAsCongress @JeffreyBrandes So.....road construction is done by private contractors who just want to fix roads?

[SIGzero989 @SIGzero989]

With what money?

Have you ever been part or involved in a LBR? Do you know how many projects have to go in front of the governor?

Now with amendment 3 passing, those local governments have to prioritize funding those essential services and will not be able to fund other projects.

Every year I am involved in a LBR, the amount of LBR submitted yearly will now have to compete with counties trying to fund essential services.

I can tell you that projects that will require construction costs will be very very low on the priority list.

[SIGzero989 @SIGzero989]

@Douglas94342267 @JeffreyBrandes But what long reaching impact will this have when all those road improvement and construction jobs go MIA?

All those tax dollars that were supposed to cycle through our economy, GONE!!

[SIGzero989 @SIGzero989]

Again, you're unrealistic or you are just far removed from what is actually going on. Fortunately or unfortunately, you haven't experienced any of this in you life or family. If or when you do, you will complain that why don't we have these services?

You have no idea the money tax payers have saved through these programs.

And don't get me wrong, I'm no bleeding heat liberal. I am https://t.co/9ttbTiuOzf do the crime you do the time kind of guy. But, how do you say that to someone who is not a criminal.

If you want to have a serious, open minded conversation, I'll be more than happy to provide you examples.

[SIGzero989 @SIGzero989]

So, let me get this straight. You want to eliminate government funding for mental health and substance use treatment? 🤔

Where exactly do you think these individuals go when those services disappear? The ER? Jail? Homeless shelters? And WHO do you think pays for all of that?

The same goes for senior services. When elderly individuals can no longer receive assistance to remain safely in their homes, what happens? More hospitalizations? Nursing home placements? Again, WHO PAYS?

You're not eliminating the costs. You're shifting people into far MORE EXPENSIVE systems, with taxpayers still footing the bill!

I'm all for eliminating waste, but your approach isn't reasonable. You're suggesting cuts without considering the consequences or the actual costs.

And honestly, trying to have a productive conversation with you is just as dumb as Amendment 3.

Eliminating a service doesn't eliminate the need for it.

[SIGzero989 @SIGzero989]

@Spoogymonkey @JeffreyBrandes I can also see Franchise fees for use of county rights-of-way from utility / solid waste pick up companies coming. In my county they are already going to raise the sales tax a half cent. I'm sure the millage will go up to 10 mill also.

[SIGzero989 @SIGzero989]

This is an interesting list, and I think there's an opportunity worth exploring.

Could mental health and substance use treatment also qualify? I understand non-ad valorem assessments generally require a special benefit to the property, making behavioral health treatment difficult to include.

But what about Florida Statute 125.271, which provides certain counties with specific authority for emergency medical services assessments? Could that offer a legislative model worth exploring for behavioral health services?

Could the Legislature authorize a similar funding mechanism or behavioral health district to support crisis stabilization, detox, Baker Act/Marchman Act transports, and other treatment services?

Alternatively, couldn't counties use qualifying assessments for fire protection and infrastructure, freeing up unrestricted General Fund revenue for behavioral health and other essential services?

I think these are avenues worth investigating.

[SIGzero989 @SIGzero989]

Since a non-ad valorem assessment generally needs to provide a specific benefit to the property, couldn't counties focus those assessments on fire protection and other qualifying emergency services (ES)?

Then, if those services were funded through the assessments, couldn't the county use the remaining unrestricted General Fund revenue to support other essential services, such as senior programs, behavioral health, and juvenile services?

Wouldn't this be a potential way to offset some of the lost revenue while protecting essential services? 🤔

[SIGzero989 @SIGzero989]

It's really unfortunate, and I sincerely appreciate Jeff doing his best to bring awareness to this issue. 🙏

But we were up against a political JUGGERNAUT.

There are serious questions about the financial relationships between the data-center industry and politicians like Byron Donalds. Those campaign contributions and connections deserve scrutiny.

Now, with Amendment 3 passing, I'm concerned we've potentially given Tallahassee even MORE financial leverage over our local communities.

Rural counties could become increasingly dependent on state funding just to maintain essential services. And what happens if that funding comes with strings attached?

"Sure, we'll help fund your county. Just approve this massive data center first." 🤔

We may have lost the argument at the ballot box, but that doesn't mean the concerns disappear.

History will be the judge. 🇺🇸

Thank you Jeff!!!

[SIGzero989 @SIGzero989]

@LOUISECICCONE1 @JeffreyBrandes Yup!!

[SIGzero989 @SIGzero989]

@LisaFla8 @srqrealtor1 @GovGoneWild Well, Hallelujah Lisa, because I'm a home owner. Although, I don't think you are, unless you count living in mommy's and daddy's bedroom qualifies.

[SIGzero989 @SIGzero989]

Awww, Lisa. 😂 You keep calling people names, but you're actually helping make my point!

What does this have to do with property taxes? Let me explain.

Many senior services receive funding through local governments, including property-tax revenue. Those programs can help people with dementia remain in their homes, assist disabled seniors with home modifications, and connect struggling families with resources.

And your suggestion that seniors can simply use their tax savings to hire home health aides? Do you have any idea what in-home care actually costs? A few hundred dollars in annual tax savings won't come close to covering ongoing care for someone with dementia.

Most will only save about 100 to 150 bucks from property-taxes based on this amendment. That won't pay for much, or anything at all.

I'm all for eliminating waste and helping homeowners. But cutting local revenue doesn't magically eliminate the need for these programs.

Because insults aren't a funding plan, Lisa. 😉

[SIGzero989 @SIGzero989]

Awww, Lisa, there you go again! 😂 More name-calling and another politician's social media graphic. Is that where you get all your information?

Let me explain something you're missing.

Lower property taxes may help some seniors financially. I've NEVER disputed that. But what about the elderly person suffering from dementia who needs assistance to remain at home? Or the disabled senior who needs a walk-in shower installed because they can no longer safely use their bathtub?

I've personally witnessed how publicly funded programs help these people maintain their independence.

And your claim that first responders are "marked safe"? 😂

Both DeSantis and Donalds publicly discussed additional state assistance for financially constrained rural counties. WHY would they need that assistance if essential-service funding were already guaranteed?

Prioritizing public safety doesn't automatically guarantee current funding levels.

And quoting Milton Friedman doesn't answer that question.

I don't need politicians or social media personalities to tell me what these services mean to people. I've seen it firsthand.

You keep calling me a loser, Lisa, but I wasn't competing against you. I was advocating for people whose needs are often overlooked.

You celebrate your tax savings. I'll continue helping seniors, children in crisis, veterans, and struggling families.

And here's a little advice: Try having a conversation without the insults. You might actually learn something. 😉🇺🇸

[SIGzero989 @SIGzero989]

HAHAHAHA! 😂 Did you figure that out all by yourself, or did you learn it scrolling through someone else's social media posts?

And I think the joke might actually be on you. 😉

See, whether Amendment 3 passed or failed, I was never a winner or a loser. My life wasn't going to change either way.

I wasn't fighting for myself or a few dollars in my pocket. I was standing up for the people whose voices often go unheard.

The elderly struggling to remain in their homes, children experiencing mental health crises, veterans needing treatment, and families depending on essential community services.

I didn't spend weeks discussing Amendment 3 because I wanted to WIN an argument. I did it because I CARE about what happens to those people.

And guess what? I'll wake up tomorrow and continue helping them, just like I always have.

So if calling me a LOSER makes you feel better, congratulations! 😂

You were celebrating a political victory. I was standing up for people who needed someone to speak for them.

There's a difference. 😉🇺🇸

[SIGzero989 @SIGzero989]

@VoteRandyFine https://t.co/mhc1EiIBO6

[SIGzero989 @SIGzero989]

🇺🇸 TODAY IS JUDGMENT DAY! 🇺🇸

Florida, please get out and VOTE! 🗳️

After weeks of debating Amendment 3, today the voters have their say.

If you're still undecided, I encourage you to examine the unanswered questions about rural counties and essential services before casting your ballot.

Both Ron DeSantis and Byron Donalds have publicly discussed additional state assistance for financially constrained counties. Donalds even proposed a special funding formula.

That raises an important question: If essential services are protected, why is replacement funding being discussed? 🤔

I've always supported tax relief, government accountability, and eliminating waste. But I also believe in protecting the services our communities depend on.

Whatever happens tonight, I want to sincerely THANK everyone who took the time to read my posts, share their thoughts, and give them a like. ❤️

And yes, I even appreciate those who disagreed with me, especially the ones who kept our conversations respectful and professional. We may disagree, but we all have a stake in Florida's future.

The debates are nearly over. Now it's up to the voters.

Please exercise your right to vote, make an informed decision, and remember that our communities will live with the consequences long after Election Day.

God bless Florida, and God bless America! 🇺🇸

[SIGzero989 @SIGzero989]

@FloridaForJolly https://t.co/mhc1EiJ9DE

[SIGzero989 @SIGzero989]

🇺🇸 TODAY IS JUDGMENT DAY! 🇺🇸

Florida, please get out and VOTE! 🗳️

After weeks of debating Amendment 3, today the voters have their say.

If you're still undecided, I encourage you to examine the unanswered questions about rural counties and essential services before casting your ballot.

Both Ron DeSantis and Byron Donalds have publicly discussed additional state assistance for financially constrained counties. Donalds even proposed a special funding formula.

That raises an important question: If essential services are protected, why is replacement funding being discussed? 🤔

I've always supported tax relief, government accountability, and eliminating waste. But I also believe in protecting the services our communities depend on.

Whatever happens tonight, I want to sincerely THANK everyone who took the time to read my posts, share their thoughts, and give them a like. ❤️

And yes, I even appreciate those who disagreed with me, especially the ones who kept our conversations respectful and professional. We may disagree, but we all have a stake in Florida's future.

The debates are nearly over. Now it's up to the voters.

Please exercise your right to vote, make an informed decision, and remember that our communities will live with the consequences long after Election Day.

God bless Florida, and God bless America! 🇺🇸

[SIGzero989 @SIGzero989]

@Fievel131 https://t.co/mhc1EiIBO6

[SIGzero989 @SIGzero989]

🇺🇸 TODAY IS JUDGMENT DAY! 🇺🇸

Florida, please get out and VOTE! 🗳️

After weeks of debating Amendment 3, today the voters have their say.

If you're still undecided, I encourage you to examine the unanswered questions about rural counties and essential services before casting your ballot.

Both Ron DeSantis and Byron Donalds have publicly discussed additional state assistance for financially constrained counties. Donalds even proposed a special funding formula.

That raises an important question: If essential services are protected, why is replacement funding being discussed? 🤔

I've always supported tax relief, government accountability, and eliminating waste. But I also believe in protecting the services our communities depend on.

Whatever happens tonight, I want to sincerely THANK everyone who took the time to read my posts, share their thoughts, and give them a like. ❤️

And yes, I even appreciate those who disagreed with me, especially the ones who kept our conversations respectful and professional. We may disagree, but we all have a stake in Florida's future.

The debates are nearly over. Now it's up to the voters.

Please exercise your right to vote, make an informed decision, and remember that our communities will live with the consequences long after Election Day.

God bless Florida, and God bless America! 🇺🇸