Today @RealCandaceO showed clearer footage of the alleged gunman walking through UVU campus. My question is simple:
Do guns bend like rubber as this individuals leg does? If the gun wasn’t in this man’s pants leg, was it in the backpack? If so, where in the available videos do we see him assemble it?
Let alone, at what point is it seen at all in any of the footage of him running across the roof?
If it’s reasonable to observe, if you allow yourself to, that it is not only non-observable, but also defies common-sense since rifles don’t bend like rubber as this man’s leg is when stepping down, how did the gun end up in the woods?
Perhaps during the trial we will get HD footage proving beyond a reasonable doubt that both Tyler Robinson shot Charlie Kirk, and that at some point his grandfathers rifle was on the roof.
These honest questions are important since, as Americans, we believe that a person is innocent until proven guilty.
I don’t know the truth, but I want to know.
Justice for Charlie.
@ImBreckWorsham The problem with ai is that stuff like this will come out and they know they can get away with stuff because people will think this is Ai. That’s, in my opinion, why they are pushing Ai so much
The Official Charlie Kirk assassination story is now 100% dead!
Candace Owens just dropped powerful never before seen surveillance video of the Losee Center rooftop.
The video Owens released appears to be raw and unedited! This is the same footage that the court will not let the public see, that we are meant to believe is Tyler Robinson assassinating Charlie Kirk.
The individual does not look like Tyler Robinson.
The rifle is never pulled from his pants.
The person in the footage has no limp.
Nowhere do we see the shooter assembling the gun on the roof as we were told.
No recoil is seen.
He performs military maneuvers with precision as well as signaling before opening fire.
The official narrative just COLLAPSED…
Blake Neff has watched his name trend all day after calling Candace Owens a "coon"—and he hasn't addressed it once.
Instead, he's currently reposting clips from her episode.
That tells you everything you need to know .
There's only one reason all of these people would be Google Image searched from Fort Huachuca in the days and weeks before Charlie was murdered.
The betrayal is unfathomable.
@AndrewKolvet, not even you, a serial liar, can explain this away.
Some of the most Important Questions that should be asked Forever.
🚨Why was this Completely Dug Out and repaved?
🚨Where did the order Come from to do this?
🚨Who Instructed that person to give that Order?
Not to be Graphic, but JFK had Brain matter shot all over the car and on Elm Street in downtown Dallas in 1963. Did they remove all that concrete and repave?
Again, see my post from the weekend about my long time Auto Detail Business from 1986-2001.
🔘Evidence seeps or gets entangled into carpet.
🔘Evidence seeps into grass and soil very similarly.
🔘Things such as Rode Mic Debris would be
IMPOSSIBLE to mow over or suck out 100% of the debris.
💥We are being Lied To!
@candaceowens@baroncoleman@leahfiles@realstewpeters@AnaKasparian@AnaEscobarShow@CharlotteLee_88@IanCarrollShow
I want to thank @billiewebbb, @brandisiciliani, @TeresAbetterLif & @DiligentDenizen for their outstanding work last week covering the Tyler Robinson/Charlie Kirk case ON THE GROUND IN UTAH.
They went there at great personal cost both in time & money to do real journalism—digging out & defending the truth without propaganda or prejudice.
We should support them not just with our retweets, but with our dollars. That's how we continue to get solid coverage—by supporting & subsidizing the people who provide it.
They have no idea I'm doing this. They did not ask me to do this. They might even be a little embarrassed by it. I don't care. And don't listen to them if they say making a donation isn't necessary. It absolutely is. I'm asking you to support these people who are in the trenches.
Please follow them on Twitter, make a donation to their venmo, then share this graphic on other platforms. Thank you.
Billie Webb:
https://t.co/UZWc9Y9tA0
https://t.co/GBtwDqICL5
Brandi Siciliani:
https://t.co/pAHG5eDztE
https://t.co/caW1OYQJ4D
Teresa:
https://t.co/xMtAdcCbze
https://t.co/Q3hxrsKYTq
Diligent Denizen:
https://t.co/dofPRtAij9
https://t.co/JlcIz2JNrk
(DiligentDenizen on CashApp)
Former Intelligence Officer Jack Posobiec talking about how he would carry out a psyop while wearing the same t-shirt Charlie Kirk was assassinated in.
Un-fucking-believable.
They don't even TRY to hide it anymore.
DID SHE JUST SAY
"JUST LIKE THAT MAN IN THE COURTROOM THAT MURDERED MY HUSBAND" ?
B*TCH AREN'T YOU UNDER A GAG ORDER.
THE MANIPULATING WIDOW STRIKES AGAIN.
I want to know why all those people have an issue with us questioning things! Charlie literally was always asking questions about things! Now that he’s not here anymore, we can’t question a word! Charlie would be asking questions about this if it was someone else who it happened2
‼️EXPOSED: Blake Neff Just Showed EXACTLY Why People Don’t Trust TPUSA Anymore 👀
Tonight on Paramount Not So Tactical’s Space, @BlakeSNeff spent the entire time defending the official story while refusing to engage with basic questions about the evidence.
When pressed on the car footage, the bullet diameter mismatch, the dust in the barrel, and the timeline contradictions, Blake didn’t address any of it. Instead, he called the exploding mic theory “the dumbest thing in the world,” compared it to bad TV writing, and tried to shut down the conversation by saying “that’s not what we’re here to talk about.”
Even when it was pointed out that the ATF ballistics expert admitted the recovered rifle had dust inside the barrel (meaning it hadn’t been recently fired), Blake brushed it off and said he didn’t know what she meant by “dust.”
This is the same guy who has positioned himself as someone just “reporting the facts.” But when actual inconsistencies from the preliminary hearing are brought up, he immediately pivots to defending TPUSA and attacking the people asking questions.
If the evidence was as overwhelming as they claim, why does the defense of it always turn into deflection and insults instead of addressing the actual forensics?
🚨 WATCH THIS VIDEO.
PAY ATTENTION TO THE PEOPLE BEHIND THE WITNESS.
I just stumbled across what appears to be a largely overlooked eyewitness interview from September 10 at UVU.
Listen carefully to what the witness says they heard:
“It sounded like a cherry bomb.”
That description immediately caught my attention considering everything that’s been debated since.
Is this a forgotten eyewitness account that deserves another look, or just a detail that got lost in the chaos?
Watch the video. Listen closely. Tell me what you hear.
👇👇👇
#CharlieKirk #BreakingNews #UVU #Eyewitness #Investigate #QuestionEverything
🥳 As soon as @RealCandaceO showed these screenshots, I IMMEDIATELY knew it was over with for the anti-Candace crowd!
🧾 They are all PAID SCRIPTED SPEAKERS!!
The evidence of their coordination is always visible in thier coordinated scripted posts... 🫴🏾