@LoftusSteve No I asked Grok to double check (as said) the graphic it produced. As the one Steve commented on was not real - it was supposed to be helpful - did you read the small print at the bottom.
@_kaludi_@NavyLookout Interesting... butb the Ford does not use the electrical power for main propulsion, the QE class does. 280,000shp vs 180,000shp.
Top Trumps ๐Ford faster
(Different figures of Ford class MW as engineer in for potential 2ยฝ-3x expansion)
@enviro1993@NavyLookout Yes you are right Alex you wouldn't ๐ it would be a part of the five layer defense network around a carrier in the Mid-Tier Interceptor range (20โ100 Miles) but the need for nuclear supplied MW remains to support future developments.
@jedis83@NavyLookout Yes ๐ would need serious storage to allow simultaneous use of auxiliary systems not to mention radar, EMALS catapult & a recharge system for a raingun. Perhaps not the best platform but the principle remains nuclear provides MW headroom for future development.
Interesting.
@JuliaHB1 In addition neighbours will get a 10-20% drop in value as their property will only appeal to commercial use C3/C4.
A young family is not going to buy their first home next to an HMO.
@LiamHalligan Starmer & Reeves are like vampires trying to suck the last drop of blood from the corpse of the British economy.
Economic stupidity & ideological zealotry have lit the funeral pyre & they dance around with derranged glee cackling over the ashes.
Sorry forgot Breakfast Clubs!