slush

Bitcoin OG. Co-founder @Satoshilabs @Trezor @Vexl @TropicSquare @Invity_io

[slush @slush]

@sethforprivacy Jealous. That's the disadvantage of SM120 arch; we have to wait few hours longer until some brave heart adapt new models for us. 🤔

[slush @slush]

@PavolRusnak @openclaw Tried Hermes and never looked back. Was more stable and less bloated.

[slush @slush]

@sethforprivacy JFYI, it was incorrect sampling parameters in vllm (or better - lack of setting them). top_p=0.95 and temperature=1.0 fixed Czech language issues.

[slush @slush]

@sethforprivacy GLM's language capabilities are remarkably worse than DS's. I noticed it in English, but in Czech it's sometimes even hard to understand what it's trying to say.

On the other hand, it was able to identify and fix DevOps/networking issues where DS hit a wall."

[slush @slush]

@hugomofn @tsusanka What software uses this path to message signing specifically?

[slush @slush]

@Mandrik Little baklava 🧡

[slush @slush]

@Dantoshi @gotpayd @Ledger @Trezor It would be Unsafe without LiFePO4 😃

[slush @slush]

@fhudvhu @JWWeatherman_ @grok Btw this issue has been known since the beginning, and *that* was the reason Model One always generated seeds of 256b.

We then forced the UI to "advanced recovery" primarily to improve the phishing narrative of "never enter the words into the computer", not because of entropy.

[slush @slush]

This is *not* about Trezor.

Also, this is textbook FUD - riding on Coldcard and AI fear-mongering without naming a single concrete detail.

Make it actionable or STFU.

[slush @slush]

@sethforprivacy 🙏

[slush @slush]

@BitsagaRob You still forgot to delete the main one.

[slush @slush]

@MKjrstad That's exactly the question caused by a fear in the community.

Yes, we are even included in Anthropic security program. We are taking our job seriously.

[slush @slush]

@JWWeatherman_ Um, like, never? Or do you reminding any specific case which I don't remember?

[slush @slush]

@PavolRusnak Please give me markdown to replace Slack 🙏

[slush @slush]

Yeah, because for normies this is not confusing at all. /s

You have to connect your signer to see money in your wallet.

[Ledger @Ledger]

We agree so much we already did it. Last October at Op3n we retired "hardware wallet" for "signer," and Ledger Live became Ledger Wallet.

Two words, two jobs. The signer is the hardware that proves intent and consent. The Wallet is where you actually buy, swap, and stake.

And signers matter even more now. Deepfakes can clone your face and your voice. They still can't press your button.

[slush @slush]

In 2016, we did a major overhaul of the Trezor website and switched the narrative from "wallet" to "signing device."

Few people know this, but Trezor could act as a signer for SSH, GPG, U2F, and FIDO2 almost from day one.

Sales dropped to near zero overnight. Nobody knew why to buy a signer - everyone was looking for a bitcoin wallet. We reverted within three days.

So @Excellion opinion isn't unpopular. It's just naive.

[Samson Mow @Excellion]

Unpopular Opinion: We should rename “Bitcoin hardware wallets” to “Bitcoin signing devices.”

It’d fix so many problems in understanding for Bitcoin beginners and make it evident why a passphrase is needed.

Everything is a @SeedSigner with extra steps and tradeoffs.

[slush @slush]

@OneSirMeow Trezor could do this already, it is just minor SW change for specific use cases. We did it for non interactive coinjoin signing already.

It seems there's not enough demand for that though.

[slush @slush]

@OneSirMeow I do use it for critical application for SSH and GPG signing. Not for everyday use though.