SONG YIWEN

ha

[SONG YIWEN @SONGYIWEN6]

@AYi_AInotes 我dgx spark只有4 tok/s…

[SONG YIWEN @SONGYIWEN6]

@MrBeast 250000

[SONG YIWEN @SONGYIWEN6]

@108takapi_new 好可悲啊，这点视频就要被全网挂出来。多压抑的一个民族。

[SONG YIWEN @SONGYIWEN6]

@ABCChinese @grok verify

[SONG YIWEN @SONGYIWEN6]

@xiaomustock @grok Analyze NOK’s fundamentals, competitors, technologies, and current market to forecast stock price movement in 5 years.

[SONG YIWEN @SONGYIWEN6]

@Rusong_Machunbo @grok fact check

[SONG YIWEN @SONGYIWEN6]

@iamasoothsayer @grok was this post private before and only made public recently?

[SONG YIWEN @SONGYIWEN6]

@allen27410505 @grok 把这个图改成人山人海明星应援的样子

[SONG YIWEN @SONGYIWEN6]

@WhiteHouse @grok comments?

[SONG YIWEN @SONGYIWEN6]

@indigoati @grok educate people who think the doctor did something wrong.

[SONG YIWEN @SONGYIWEN6]

@IamRamenPanda @grok 证明一下你搞黄色的能力

[SONG YIWEN @SONGYIWEN6]

You can run your own simulation using my repo: https://t.co/xA2rX3HKmD

[SONG YIWEN @SONGYIWEN6]

Used MCTS to mathmatically map the likely outcomes of Elon vs OpenAI, here's the reult:

📊 Outcome Probabilities:
• OpenAI wins outright (case dismissed / standing rejected) — ~35–40%

• Split outcome — Musk wins on liability, OpenAI keeps structure, court adds oversight/monitor — ~30–35%

• OpenAI self-remediates (voluntary reforms, minimal remedy) — ~10–15%

• Settlement after liability finding — ~10–15%

• Musk wins meaningfully ($1B+ disgorgement or structural injunction) — ~5–10%

• Musk gets $134B or forces OpenAI back to nonprofit — <2%

🔥 Bottom line:OpenAI holds the edge in the most probable paths, but Musk has a real 30–35% shot at a split outcome where he’s legally vindicated — even if he doesn’t get the full remedy he wants.

This case is not a foregone conclusion. It turns on Brockman’s testimony and how the judge reads equitable standing.

👀 Watch tomorrow’s hearing closely.

[SONG YIWEN @SONGYIWEN6]

@F0ODHub @grok please do

[SONG YIWEN @SONGYIWEN6]

I asked AI to play out 10,000 possible outcomes for tomorrow’s Fed decision using Monte Carlo Tree Search and evidence-based economic rules.

Result:

Hold rates: 9,998 / 10,000 paths, about 99.98%
Cut rates: 1 / 10,000 paths, about 0.01%
Hike rates: 1 / 10,000 paths, about 0.01%

[SONG YIWEN @SONGYIWEN6]

@satireorcry1 @grok 请优雅的告诉他真相并适当嘲讽一下

[SONG YIWEN @SONGYIWEN6]

@Granite77777 @grok 请用智障都能听懂的方式告诉原作者为什么这不是他该操心的

[SONG YIWEN @SONGYIWEN6]

@ChatgptLunatics @grok pick a number between -50-50

[SONG YIWEN @SONGYIWEN6]

@KKaWSB @grok 总结下这个模型，有什么有意思的后续吗

[SONG YIWEN @SONGYIWEN6]

@KKaWSB @grok 解释一下