Thank you, Ayaz. You’ve been incredibly supportive. I’ll share more details next week as we continue to push. We are still awaiting the next date in the Bombay High Court, 9 adjournments so far. The evidence in #Suit452025 (including the @Visa_IND and @WorldlineGlobal affidavits) is already on record. Appreciate your encouragement.
Dear Ayaz,
But here is the catch: @YESBANK settling for one customer yesterday (just as @ICICIBank did for one in July) proves the “sub-judice” shield is a choice, not a legal barrier.
If the error is acknowledged in one case, the principle applies to all. The @RBI cannot allow banks to cherry-pick who gets justice while leaving ₹13.30 Cr of systemic exposure in limbo.
Selective settlement is not regulation — it’s damage control.
Every affected customer across banks such as @HDFC_Bank, @ICICIBank and @rblbank deserves the same permanent credit that YES Bank has just demonstrated is possible.
This is especially relevant since @WorldlineGlobal had provided documented evidence to @TheOfficialSBI in their correspondence, and card networks @Visa_IND, @mastercardindia and @RuPay_npci, along with @AUSmallFinBank, have supported customers in affidavits before the Mumbai High Court.
Please let me know if you would like documentary evidence, including instances where the @RBI Ombudsman closed complaints as “duplicate” or “sub-judice.”
@suchetadalal@nsitharaman@DasShaktikanta
Exactly, Sucheta ji.
When the @RBI’s Integrated Ombudsman Scheme focuses on ₹25k refunds but allows MNCs like @WorldlineGlobal to move ahead with a €60M deal via @billdesk, while leaving a ₹13.30 Cr exposure referenced in @TheOfficialSBI correspondence, the contradiction becomes obvious.
Closing such cases as “duplicate” or “sub-judice” is not just an administrative error it effectively becomes a regulatory shield.
Accountability cannot be a lottery that works only “at the highest level.”
It must be the baseline for every Ombudsman decision.
Well we have brought to @RBI attention cases where ombudsmen closed complaints with hearing customers; and where banks were vindictive towards complaints- one was finally resolved at the highest level of RBI! Unless there is accountability and oversight over ombudsmen too and they are penalised for dubious decisions- nothing will change!
Ads pitch @ICICIBank as the 'safest,' but the @FalconInvoice saga tells a different story. 🧾💸
They blocked chargebacks using intermediary letters, yet granted a permanent chargeback to another customer in July 2025 while the same matter was pending before the Bombay High Court. ⚖️
With @dir_ed attaching assets and MD Amardeep Kumar arrested at Mumbai Airport this month (Jan 5), why is @RBI silent and closing complaints as 'sub-judice'? Selective 'safety' for some, legal hurdles for the rest. Blocking ads is the only way to tune out the hypocrisy. 🚫🏛️
Vital message, @NameIsNani! 👏 But the reality in Hyderabad is 1 in 4 FIRs is now a cyber fraud. While the Falcon scam mastermind Amardeep Kumar was finally nabbed at Mumbai airport on Jan 5, thousands are still stuck in a cycle of 10+ adjournments and zero restitution. We need the authorities to act on similar 'invoice' clones before the next ₹800cr vanishes. Prevention is great, but justice for the already duped is urgent! ⚖️🚫 #CyberSafety #FalconScam
Aravind, while we debate student 'entitlement' during evacuations, we’re missing a much darker Iran connection. One of India’s biggest financial impostors Amardeep Kumar was just arrested at Mumbai Airport this Monday after hiding out in Iran.
He allegedly cheated over 7,000 investors of ₹792 crore through the Falcon scam before fleeing on a private jet. It’s ironic: while the government is issuing advisories to keep innocent students safe from war, a mastermind who siphoned off middle-class savings was using that same territory as a bolt-hole. Maybe the 'responsibility' to heed warnings should start with the regulators who let him fly out in the first place.
@ShivrattanDhil1@HDFC_Bank@HDFCBank_Cares Not being named in a headline scam doesn’t equal reliability.
@HDFC_Bank's problem isn’t spectacular fraud, it’s procedural gaslighting.
Context: https://t.co/cwwd0l2Nt5
This mirrors my experience with @HDFC_Bank almost exactly. It is no longer just negligence; it’s a systematic exhaustion strategy designed to make you give up.
📍 Documents submitted multiple times with clear proof are "lost" to justify sudden closures.
📍 Selective omission of specific transactions in their written replies to manipulate the narrative.
📍 Zero provisional or temporary credit provided, despite applicable card rules.
📍 Serious customer data breach where HDFC shared another customer’s private info with me.
📍 I have seen 50–100 tickets quietly parked and closed since last year without a single resolution.
The cycle is always the same: Reopen → Delay → Close → Repeat. When a bank this size treats evidence and sensitive data so casually, it’s a total institutional failure.
And yes, @RBI remains a silent spectator
Thank you @KartiPC for taking this up.
What makes this especially troubling is the contrast in priorities.
When it concerns its MD & CEO, @HDFC_Bank issues clarifications overnight.
When it concerns customers, delays stretch into months and years.
In our own case:
No temporary credit for over 12 months on Falcon-linked card transactions, citing “case in court”
Disputes closed without transaction-level adjudication
Customer data breach involving HDFC’s Senior Management / Priority team
A broken escalation matrix, where the grievance team was more responsive than senior management
We are also seeing this pattern publicly:
A BBC investigation showed how HDFC missed multiple red flags in a ₹58.5 crore “digital arrest” scam
(https://t.co/6M12bpAQck)
The issue isn’t one incident. It’s systemic.
Customer protection vs CEO protection - two very different standards appear to apply.
Corporate takeovers saved Satyam, but 'Takeover' shouldn't apply to fugitives escaping the law. From Mallya’s London life to Amardeep Singh’s vanishing act in the [@RameshNarasimh9@WorldlineMS@PAVacheron – @TheOfficialSBI – @FalconInvoice (Amardeep Singh)] case, the lack of Interpol action is a mockery of justice. When do the depositors get their Satyam-style closure?
#RéflexionsDuDimanche
8 ajournements plus tard, 2025 nous laisse avec une date, pas avec la justice. ⚖️
Alors que les lumières de fin d'année s'allument, les victimes de l'arnaque [ @RameshNarasimh9@WorldlineMS@PAVacheron – @TheOfficialSBI – @FalconInvoice (Amardeep Singh)] restent dans l'ombre. 🌑 12 mois de « procédure légale » n'ont abouti qu'à une nouvelle date en janvier 2026.
Le contraste est une insulte : 🖐️
💸 L'accusé : Vit dans le luxe, change de nom et refait sa vie l'argent a été détourné vers des entités lançant des introductions en bourse (IPO) @SEBI_India.
🏦 Les banques (@HDFC_Bank, @ICICIBank, @rblbank...) : Clôturent les litiges et débitent les victimes alors que l'ED (@dir_ed) confirme la fraude. 🛑
📉 Les victimes : Réduites à la misère, attendant un système qui avance à un rythme de tortue. 🐢
Les faits restent inchangés : 📌
✅ @Visa & @Mastercard ont confirmé que les services n'ont jamais été fournis. ✈️ @dir_ed a tracé le flux mondial et a mis aux enchères le Hawker 800A pour l'indemnisation des victimes. 💪 @AUSmallFinBank a montré le courage qui manque aux géants en déposant des affidavits.
Alors pourquoi le médiateur de la @RBI reste-t-il silencieux ? 🤐 Pourquoi les plaintes sont-elles classées sans suite alors que la réconciliation bancaire n'est pas faite ?
2025 a été l'année de l'ajournement. Nous exigeons que 2026 soit l'année de la restitution. 💰
Les réseaux bancaires ont déplacé l'argent ; les réseaux bancaires doivent le rendre. La justice retardée est un choix—un choix qui favorise actuellement le fraudeur. 🎭
Janvier 2026 : Plus de dates. Uniquement des remboursements. ⏳
The “research-oriented” startup narrative is increasingly being used as a laundromat for illegal funds.
@iPravinKaushal’s @livemint piece on so-called “patient patents” lays bare the mechanism: patents are filed for valuation optics, not innovation. With barely a 16% grant rate, these filings serve as camouflage for where the capital actually comes from.
Case in point: the @RameshNarasimh9@WorldlineMS@PAVacheron@TheOfficialSBI@FalconInvoice (Amardeep Singh) scam. The Enforcement Directorate has mapped a ₹4,215 crore global money trail. The statutory auditor, Sharad Chandra Toshniwal, is already in custody for assisting in laundering these proceeds of crime into specific hardware and healthcare entities.
As per the ED, ₹23.6 crore of stolen investor money was routed as equity and loans into an entity that is now brazenly preparing for an IPO. How does a company built on proceeds of crime even reach the public markets?
We celebrate “innovation”, but what we are witnessing is patent theatre masking a Ponzi foundation. When the capital is criminal and the auditor is in jail, an IPO is not an exit. It is a transfer of risk to the public.
The orchestrators (@WorldlineMS, @TheOfficialSBI) keep getting investments, while abettors (@HDFC_Bank, @ICICIBank, @rblbank) damage honest taxpayers' credit scores.
We need a government precaution for #BigBoss too, just like the warnings for cigarette/alcohol ads. When TRP becomes toxic, the public pays the price.