I have driven FSD since 2022- I had a X and now a Y!
78% of the time I use FSD! I guarantee it is not possible to not over ride FSD on most trips! It cannot pull into or out of my subdivision unless I turn it off! I cannot take a left out of my office park unless I turn it off! It does not recognize you are not supposed to cross a solid white line on the road! It will cross illegally!
BS-It still makes the same critical errors!
It might drive better but it’s useless if it makes turns from the wrong lane- thinks there is a medium in the road when there is not! Crosses over a double white line illegally and is dangerous!
The updates are only valuable if the correct critical errors! And your maps are very out dated!
BS
The Future Political Alignment!
In the near future - The US-Russia~China will become Allies !
Europe will be the odd Muslim Radical societies on the outside looking in!
CONGRESS should volunteer to have pay checks held until they fund Homeland Security with no amendments or political notions!
Do not say you support homeland security unless you act!
I volunteer to not pay taxes until they fund Homeland security!
@SenAdamSchiff BS- it would be ok with me if IRAN laid a iCBm on your house to get your attention with you in it! Maybe your state would get the point BS
FSD degraded by weather- how in the H-ll is this system really ready for self driving!
Somebody needs to take some truth serum regarding FSD being ready to work- it’s years away and over priced- we are crash dummy’s! BS
On March 4, 2026, the U.S. House of Representatives effectively rejected (via a tabling motion) a push led by Rep. Nancy Mace to publicly disclose the names of House members involved in sexual harassment settlements. The effort, proposed through H.Res.1100, was opposed by Ethics Committee leaders over concerns that it would "chill" cooperation from victims.

Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives (.gov)
+1
Key Details of the Vote:
•Date: March 4, 2026.
•Action: The House voted to table (effectively killing) the resolution that would have directed the Committee on Ethics to release details on sexual harassment claims against members.
•Context: The move was a response to efforts to release names of House members who used the "sexual harassment slush fund" to settle claims, notes Congressman Nick Langworthy (https://t.co/hZH5Ge1lJu.
•Arguments: Proponents argued for transparency, while opponents argued it would deter victims from coming forward, notes Politico (https://t.co/XGgeoZlxMI). 
•Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives (.gov) +2
The vote was a major point of contention regarding congressional accountability for sexual misconduct in the 119th Congress.