If she was wearing a Hijab and said the same things about Israelis, she'd be on the FBI's Most Wanted List. Instead, she's just an "innocent" girl from Texas who now lives on occupied Palestinian land. Ethnosupremacy is a hell of a drug.
It is quite prevalent among some people, especially South Asians, to visit “peers” or people known to deal with Jinns and ask for special ‘Wazifas’ (specific litanies that are recited).
Many of these people, whom I would call jinn busters, are fraudulent and have no knowledge of the Islamic sciences. In some cases, they are magicians. And, yes, some of them can be genuine too.
Sometimes the actions they prescribe are strange. For example, a friend of mine, who was recently suffering from some kind of effect, visited one of these jinn busters. The jinn buster told him to buy 4 kilos of fresh meat, bury some of it, and cook the rest. I told my friend there was no need for this, and instead I would tell him something powerful from the Quran which our beloved Prophet ﷺ has taught us: al-mu'awwidhatayn, the two surahs by which one seeks protection from all evil in this life and the next; that's Surah al-Falaq and Surah an-Nas.
The Messenger of Allah ﷺ said: “Verses have been revealed to me, the like of which have never been seen before: the two sūrahs of seeking refuge [al-mu'awwidhatayn]” (Muslim).
In another authentic narration, our mother Aisha (رضي الله عنها) said: “Every night, when the Prophet ﷺ went to bed, he would cup his hands together, blow into them, and recite into them Qul huwa Allāhu aḥad (Sūrat al-Ikhlāṣ), Qul aʿūdhu bi-rabbi al-falaq (Sūrat al-Falaq), and Qul aʿūdhu bi-rabbi al-nās (Sūrat al-Nās). He would then wipe his hands over whatever parts of his body he could, beginning with his head, face, and the front of his body. He would do this three times” (Bukhari).
These Prophetic actions are sufficient for us, and we don’t need to visit these fraudulent ‘peers’ who are making a business.
Extremely obvious that this will be enforced immediately against pro-Palestine protesters on the basis that Zionists will claim to have felt "distress" and "alarm".
I’d like to expose the lack of technical expertise behind British online child safety policies, challenge Ofcom’s credibility, and explain why existing parental controls should be prioritised over compulsory identity verification.
To anyone with expertise in online child safety, this is more word soup from another British MP.
I’ve advised the British government on these matters, and I can say with confidence that despite their confident statements, politicians demonstrate a lack of basic technical knowledge.
The same applies to Ofcom.
After multiple meetings with Ofcom and the British Home Office about SMS fraud, I was told the Home Office would write to Ofcom asking it to stop misleading the public about SMS fraud because it was siding with mobile operators instead of the public.
During my final meeting with Ofcom, I asked why it continued to repeat claims I’d already demonstrated were technically false, including through testing that involved every UK mobile network operator.
My experience has left me convinced that Ofcom is causing more harm than good.
The same problem is evident in the debate about online child safety.
Smartphones already have excellent parental controls that millions of parents and schools use to block unsuitable apps, websites and services, restrict content and set time limits.
Yet politicians and Ofcom continue to demand that tech companies redesign their services for children while pushing compulsory identity verification.
They ignore existing parental controls that allow parents to protect their children without forcing everyone else to surrender their privacy and online anonymity.
If child safety was really a top priority, why aren’t they teaching parents how to use these controls?
Journalists should be asking politicians and regulators two simple questions.
Why aren’t you educating parents about the parental controls already built into smartphones, which independent technical experts in child safety and mobile security consider highly effective?
And why are you demanding that social media and other companies make their content safe for children while simultaneously arguing that children should be banned from those same services?
You need to pick one.
Making every adult service safe for every child is technically impossible. Preventing children from accessing unsuitable services is already possible through smartphone parental controls.
Parents can decide what’s appropriate for their own children without forcing an entire country to surrender its privacy and online anonymity.
The relentless push for compulsory identity verification, while ignoring existing parental controls, tells me that protecting children isn’t the real priority.
This is pretty revolting — instead of admitting that, as per Ofcom’s own evidence, the Online Safety Act is an abject failure, this Labour MP is doubling down and saying it’s not enough.
If you try the same thing again and again, without success, that’s the definition of insanity.
Massive overreach of power, they want to block websites in the UK before they even find anything harmful. They also talk about "taking action" against VPN's.
I say this with my full chest. Good fucking luck trying.
Lets get this straight - a study which actually expressed clearly that there was no significant rise in anti-Semitism, rather anti-Israel sentiment is being used to force the IHRA on schools? We must stop this with all of our might.
Today is a mathematical date we won't see again for 78 years.
10/24/26
10² + 24² = 26²
It's called a Pythagorean Triple Day. There are infinitely many Pythagorean triples, but only 12 dates this century satisfy the https://t.co/I0lvmau52v is the last.
Next one: March 4, 2105.
they don't allow them to take their cars or belongings because these zio parasites aren't content with just stealing their homes. they want their cars, their furniture, their family heirlooms, toys, food, books, appliances, electronics, kitchen supplies, and so on, just like they did in 1948.
Please do not open Anna's Archive tonight. I'm serious.
You will lose your entire weekend.
Someone who only calls herself Anna built it in November 2022, days after the US government seized Z-Library's websites. Today it holds 72 million books and 239 million research papers behind one search bar.
So for your own good:
> Don't search the textbook that cost you $180
> Don't look up the paper hiding behind a $40 paywall
> Don't find the out-of-print book your grandfather loved
> Don't type the title you've "been meaning to read" since 2019
Because it's probably there.
And then you lose your favorite excuse. You'd actually have to read the thing.
Everybody says they'd learn more if books weren't so expensive. Anna's Archive is the meanest test of that sentence ever built.
Stay away. Keep your excuses safe.
As expected, Israel kills Palestinians every day for months on end and nobody bats an eye; Palestinians finally respond, attacking Israeli soldiers at an Israeli military checkpoint on occupied Palestinian land, and its front page news and Israel makes the entire West Bank pay.
Perhaps the most stark and revealing (accidental?) admission in the David Bell 'antisemitism in UK schools report. Antisemitic attitudes aren't increasing, only anti-Israel ones are. That's what most of this is about.
From the horse's mouth:
https://t.co/uxpNPelsEy