Unironically, my favourite theory about the end of GoT is that Drogon never copped it that Jon killed Dany; he just saw the knife in her body and instantly blamed the chair made of knives.
@UshiromiyaMemo@A_grayrate Nah you’re being mean on purpose. Making no sense. If current rem or Otto are here they solve this. Honestly the other don’t have the movement to do it. Doesn’t matter how you feel about the character. They don’t have it. They do
@haveumetbi Fuck ships. I don’t understand how people see E2L here. Think of character. What they went through, the cave, the betrayal, the “death” of a friend. How tf do you any of think there’s a love story here? Redemption sure? Love? Fuck no… ships or not… that will never be love.
@AJ_psykos2 Not to start an argument… but honestly wouldn’t everyone view her differently? Fuck relationships, friendships… even her personally… could she live with herself if Aang did view her differently? That’s her day 1… if he stopped operating with her like he does…
@MatthewW_eacc @pwoeoritj @SarmenSinanian@MattisRedacted@theblessedsalt Refusing to comply with lawful orders is treated as a separate offense—that’s why responses escalate. It’s not all tied to the original act, which is why proportionality still matters.
@MatthewW_eacc @pwoeoritj @SarmenSinanian@MattisRedacted@theblessedsalt Arguing that serious injury or death is acceptable as a deterrent for property damage is exactly why proportionality exists. Deterrence doesn’t justify any level of harm. If the response far outweighs the offense, it stops being reasonable enforcement and becomes excessive.
@MatthewW_eacc@SarmenSinanian@MattisRedacted@theblessedsalt Proportionality isn’t made up—it’s a core principle in both law and ethics. Punishments are scaled to offenses precisely to prevent excessive or arbitrary harm. Without it, there would be no meaningful distinction between minor and serious crimes.
@MatthewW_eacc@SarmenSinanian@MattisRedacted@theblessedsalt Proportionality is a core part of law—there are limits. Otherwise any harm could be justified for any crime. The issue isn’t deterrence, it’s whether the response is reasonable for the offense.